Jump to content


British Light Tank XP Requirements


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

EzoRedFox #1 Posted 11 July 2019 - 06:00 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 721 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    03-09-2018

The British Light tanks are included in the 1.6 test server which has just gone up tonight.

The tier 7 costs 63,000xp from the Cromwell.

Tier 7 - Setter
Tier 8 - LHMTV
Tier 9 - GSOR3301 AVRSMNOPQRSTUVWXY
Tier X - Manchild

 

17:09 Added after 8 minutes

Can i just mention that the tier 7 stock gun is a 6pdr with 900dpm

 

17:12 Added after 11 minutes

Shell capacity:

Tier 7: 35

Tier 8: 25
Tier 9: 25
Tier X: 16


Edited by EzoRedFox, 11 July 2019 - 06:01 PM.


Desyatnik_Pansy #2 Posted 11 July 2019 - 06:13 PM

    Bartender

  • Player
  • 17760 battles
  • 26,414
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013
Rolls-Royse

Balc0ra #3 Posted 11 July 2019 - 06:45 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 70974 battles
  • 19,625
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

63K? I did stop at 58K. Guess I'll get 5K more then vs wasting free XP. 

 

And ofc they don't even share modules by the looks of it.



undutchable80 #4 Posted 11 July 2019 - 07:00 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 10833 battles
  • 3,319
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

View PostBalc0ra, on 11 July 2019 - 06:45 PM, said:

63K? I did stop at 58K. Guess I'll get 5K more then vs wasting free XP. 

 

And ofc they don't even share modules by the looks of it.

 

So much to get upset about the British LTs finally being added in game, and then this is what we get, and on top of it they dont share modules. Just wow WG. *slow clap*

Tigerfish_Torpedo #5 Posted 11 July 2019 - 07:06 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 33430 battles
  • 192
  • [T0MS] T0MS
  • Member since:
    10-08-2013

View PostDesyatnik_Pansy, on 11 July 2019 - 06:13 PM, said:

Rolls-Royse

 

Well, it's a little-known company... Certainly not a multi-national manufacturer of superior vehicles, aircraft engines and the like. 

VonniVidiVici #6 Posted 11 July 2019 - 07:28 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 38691 battles
  • 12,519
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

I have 0 interest in them anyway. :rolleyes:

 

View PostDesyatnik_Pansy, on 11 July 2019 - 06:13 PM, said:

Rolls-Royse

 

Russian knock-off version?


Edited by VonniVidiVici, 11 July 2019 - 07:29 PM.


r00barb #7 Posted 11 July 2019 - 07:47 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 26740 battles
  • 10,835
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015
Let's wait for the British wheeled vehicles to be introduced. Tier VI will be an Austin Allegro with a length of drainpipe sticking out of the window. :sceptic:

TheDrownedApe #8 Posted 11 July 2019 - 07:54 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 48407 battles
  • 6,183
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013
Is this a joke? 

amashi #9 Posted 11 July 2019 - 07:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14035 battles
  • 569
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012

Watching QB stream, these tanks are *drumroll ACTUAL GARBAGE 

 



VonniVidiVici #10 Posted 11 July 2019 - 07:56 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 38691 battles
  • 12,519
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostTheDrownedApe, on 11 July 2019 - 07:54 PM, said:

Is this a joke? 

 

Belorussian humour is best humour because it is dead serious, comrade.

EzoRedFox #11 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:01 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 721 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    03-09-2018

Yea so after playing them for a bit....

They're all awful. Beyond awful. Absolutely atrocious. Here's a mini-review of them:

 

Tier 7: Mobility is utter trash feeling more like a Leo than an actual light tank. Sluggish, terrible traverse speed with poor top speed. Gun bloom is a joke, as is its alpha. Its only upside is penetration, everything else about the tank is mediocre.

Tier 8: Best of the line but still bad. It has all the pros and cons of the tier 7 except it has much better alpha tier-for-tier. Oh btw, you put your turret to the side and you have like +4 gun elevation

Tier 9: Worst of the line. Its just the tier 8 tank with very minor adjustments that no where near justify its higher tier placement. 

Tier X: Terrible gun handling, terrible mobility, terrible shell capacity. For a tank this size, it gets spotted surprisingly easily but then its taller than T-100 with marginally better camo so dunno what I expected here. Undeniably worse than Panzerwagon, which is something I thought I'd never say.


Edited by EzoRedFox, 11 July 2019 - 08:02 PM.


FryingTonight #12 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:03 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11153 battles
  • 87
  • Member since:
    10-02-2015
Had it been a joke, it would have been top trolling. Sad, that someone got paid for all this.

Mav75 #13 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34036 battles
  • 1,786
  • [-ZER0] -ZER0
  • Member since:
    10-04-2013

"This worse than the Rheinmetall Panzerwagen!" - QuickyBaby on the Manticore

 

Yeah, think I'll pass.



If_I_Die_You_Die_Too #14 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:08 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8704 battles
  • 717
  • Member since:
    07-14-2016
This is an April Fools day thread, please ignore

BlackBloodBandit #15 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 5528 battles
  • 667
  • Member since:
    12-23-2018

View PostBalc0ra, on 11 July 2019 - 06:45 PM, said:

63K? I did stop at 58K. Guess I'll get 5K more then vs wasting free XP. 

 

And ofc they don't even share modules by the looks of it.

 

View Postundutchable80, on 11 July 2019 - 07:00 PM, said:

 

So much to get upset about the British LTs finally being added in game, and then this is what we get, and on top of it they dont share modules. Just wow WG. *slow clap*

I just entered the test server which has gone live today and indeed they don't share any modules from other lines. only over the lights line.

 

I also noticed that the crew lay-out is commander - gunner - driver on the tier 7-9. The tier 10 only has a commander and driver. All the low tier lights from that line have commander - gunner - driver - loader. Not even other lights from the Firefly or td line have such a line-up.



HundeWurst #16 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:15 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 74728 battles
  • 4,599
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

You got it all wrong my dude...

 

The EXP requirements are 0, nothing, non... These tanks are beyond pathetic. And not just a bit bad or quit bad but truely and utterly pathetic.

 

Some people in WG should be let go.... I am serious here. Such mistakes and misjudgement cannot be excused. These people get PAID to do the right things, yet they only produce one f*** up after another.



r00barb #17 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:19 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 26740 battles
  • 10,835
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

Patch notes for the second iteration of Common Test have been leaked.

 

"We read your concerns about the tier 10 British light tank Manticore with great interest and as a result we are increasing the maximum number of shells that can be carried to 18. You're welcome."



ExclamationMark #18 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:22 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16785 battles
  • 4,340
  • [IDEAD] IDEAD
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
Epic-level trash tanks. :facepalm:

gunslingerXXX #19 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:32 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 12485 battles
  • 3,022
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

Looks are terrible (except manticore)

 

Names are beyond terrible... I couldn't care less if historically accurate or not, names are just dumb codes rather than names.

 

Stats... aiaiaiaiai (pronounced the way Skill does)

 

GL. I'll pass 

 



EzoRedFox #20 Posted 11 July 2019 - 08:33 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 721 battles
  • 57
  • Member since:
    03-09-2018

This is clearly the most rushed line in the game.

- Starts at tier 7 rather than a full line

- Tank balancing was done lazily and extremely poorly, would not surprise me if these statistics are the 1st iteration and have had 0 changes whatsoever. 

-Bugs, from tank icons (tier 9 icon is coloured like a TD), to issues with the spotting checks on the tanks themselves.

Such as me not being spotted in this screenshot

to issues on the damage models...

Yes, this actually damages me and is present on the tier X...

Would really appreciate someone from WG coming forward and explaining how this line came to be such a f*ck up. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users