Jump to content


Add A 64bit Client Option


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

Fanste94 #1 Posted 30 July 2019 - 01:29 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3930 battles
  • 357
  • Member since:
    01-13-2013

Why doesn't WoT have this option yet, it's older than Warface


432423412.jpg



onderschepper #2 Posted 30 July 2019 - 01:37 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 2168 battles
  • 698
  • [BOF] BOF
  • Member since:
    05-17-2019

I have wondered about this, but I just assume that it is one of those things they learned from hence implementing it in Warships. :)

 

WoWS x86.jpegWoWs x64.jpeg



Fanste94 #3 Posted 30 July 2019 - 05:30 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3930 battles
  • 357
  • Member since:
    01-13-2013

View Postonderschepper, on 30 July 2019 - 12:37 PM, said:

I have wondered about this, but I just assume that it is one of those things they learned from hence implementing it in Warships. :)

 

WoWS x86.jpegWoWs x64.jpeg

 

What happened with the Warships when they added the 64bit client option



onderschepper #4 Posted 30 July 2019 - 05:36 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 2168 battles
  • 698
  • [BOF] BOF
  • Member since:
    05-17-2019
To the best of my knowledge both launchers have been present from Day 1, and the playerbase therein is holding reasonably steady despite players with grievances - WoT players cry about Arty, WoWS players cry about Aircraft Carriers (spot the similarities).

Fanste94 #5 Posted 30 July 2019 - 11:05 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3930 battles
  • 357
  • Member since:
    01-13-2013

View Postonderschepper, on 30 July 2019 - 04:36 PM, said:

To the best of my knowledge both launchers have been present from Day 1, and the playerbase therein is holding reasonably steady despite players with grievances - WoT players cry about Arty, WoWS players cry about Aircraft Carriers (spot the similarities).

 

Well I don't know why they didn't add a 64bit client in WoT yet






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users