Jump to content


Changes to Personal Missions in Update 1.6


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:00 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 30,205
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
More than 40 missions from the second campaign will be revised to make them more achievable.

The full text of the news item

BSHDBCG #2 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6048 battles
  • 865
  • Member since:
    04-20-2015
Sounds quite nice. :)

ramboj69 #3 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:19 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34749 battles
  • 7
  • [BRT_6] BRT_6
  • Member since:
    02-03-2013
Why are all the dumb af block missions not flat out removed/changed  :facepalm:, 3 spg + prem ammo spam (HE spam if players are cheap/poor) meta make any blocking mission such a pain.

Innocent_civilian_ #4 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:23 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43047 battles
  • 231
  • [RIGA] RIGA
  • Member since:
    10-16-2015
Why the Union 15 primary mission not changed from 15 to 20 times ?????

DETOBOY #5 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:33 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3269 battles
  • 26
  • Member since:
    04-30-2017
Finally...it was 2 hard for us casual players , iam still on campagin 1 .... maybe in 4-5 years i finish campagin 2...

SV_Heckler #6 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:33 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 50452 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    05-18-2014
So the people who used orders on spg 15 on the 260 should get their orders back and try the mission from scratch that would be fair.

cv202 #7 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:42 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 30711 battles
  • 37
  • [GMBLE] GMBLE
  • Member since:
    09-11-2017

The new mission requirements are a joke.

Some of us had to actually try hard to get the obj 279...now you'll make it easy enough for as many to get it as have the 260, and then you will probably nerf it? gg...



undutchable80 #8 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:45 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 11057 battles
  • 3,499
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

View Postramboj69, on 30 July 2019 - 02:19 PM, said:

Why are all the dumb af block missions not flat out removed/changed  :facepalm:, 3 spg + prem ammo spam (HE spam if players are cheap/poor) meta make any blocking mission such a pain.

I wish non-penetrating HE hits would count towards dmg blocked... 

 

View Postcv202, on 30 July 2019 - 02:42 PM, said:

The new mission requirements are a joke.

Some of us had to actually try hard to get the obj 279...now you'll make it easy enough for as many to get it as have the 260, and then you will probably nerf it? gg...

It should be nerfed, just like the T95 Chieftain. 



Captain_Tickle #9 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27309 battles
  • 185
  • Member since:
    11-21-2016

View PostSV_Heckler, on 30 July 2019 - 02:33 PM, said:

So the people who used orders on spg 15 on the 260 should get their orders back and try the mission from scratch that would be fair.

I thought if you went back to complete an earlier mission that you had used and Order for, you automatically got your Order back. Is that not the case?



aressolo #10 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:48 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 45260 battles
  • 47
  • Member since:
    06-19-2013
I just WISH to not force players to play arty in order to complete Campaigne missions...I hate arty and in 7 years of WOT never play 1.....now I start 2 days ago.because I have almoust al the rest..now can't really support my team,because I play Bad in arty....

ramboj69 #11 Posted 30 July 2019 - 02:51 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34749 battles
  • 7
  • [BRT_6] BRT_6
  • Member since:
    02-03-2013

View Postcv202, on 30 July 2019 - 01:42 PM, said:

The new mission requirements are a joke.

Some of us had to actually try hard to get the obj 279...now you'll make it easy enough for as many to get it as have the 260, and then you will probably nerf it? gg...

obj 260 missions are still way easier than the 279 imo, almost anybody can luck into an amazing 1 off game to complete those missions, doing really well for 3/5/7/10 games is so much harder



Gremlin182 #12 Posted 30 July 2019 - 03:17 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 56129 battles
  • 9,298
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

Just remove every stun requirement for the second set of missions or make it stun or damage.

First set we could avoid a vehicle type we disliked playing SPG in my case using orders.

Second set you can complete every mission in any vehicle type which is great every mission that is unless it requires stun and those are spread around.

So you cannot ignore them and you also cannot do them all with one SPG as you need one SPG from each national group.

On the whole I like the second set better than the first as its a pain having to repeat the primary part just to complete the secondary.

 

Right now I am grinding an SPG line into high tiers just to complete personal missions nothing else would have got me to do that.

I used up orders to complete SPG mission 15 on the T28 and T55a missions and now want them back to make getting the last tank a little easier.

I see endless SPG games in my future.

So remove stun requirement or make all HE shells do Stun I will happily drive around in a KV2 or better yet a type 5 heavy doing stun missions.

 

Its just SPGs I find tiresome and boring to play.


Edited by Gremlin182, 31 July 2019 - 11:28 AM.


kuszi1994 #13 Posted 30 July 2019 - 03:45 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 10449 battles
  • 66
  • [H_A_G] H_A_G
  • Member since:
    06-05-2013
So new missions are mostly joke but the 260 missions some of them are just.. uff wtf its 2 time harder then some of the new 279.. why is like thet? 8k dmg with a td its hard to get nowdays or block missions block 3 time of your hitpoints.. come on nerf them down! and leav the 279 missions hard for a while.

STRAPATONI #14 Posted 30 July 2019 - 03:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26275 battles
  • 242
  • [IRONR] IRONR
  • Member since:
    09-05-2013
WOW amazing. not wonder why this game became bot game. bcz who left?

RagingRaptor #15 Posted 30 July 2019 - 04:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 43769 battles
  • 625
  • [OM] OM
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012

Meanwhile I just got it Yesterday :trollface:

 



deivio82 #16 Posted 30 July 2019 - 05:05 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 53948 battles
  • 172
  • [LDTO] LDTO
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012
for god sake its reward tanks. why people should grind their arse to get rubish tanks..... its should be most simple easy way  in game to receive tier 10 tank.but no someone takes a piss out of it.super idiot ...

Wolfgang_vonSus #17 Posted 30 July 2019 - 05:05 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6858 battles
  • 3
  • [SLAVA] SLAVA
  • Member since:
    08-22-2017

When are we getting the Bond shop??????????????????????????????????????

How many updates need to come to see it released?|?????????

I NEED ANSWERS WARGAMING!



Profesor_Baltazar #18 Posted 30 July 2019 - 05:07 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15414 battles
  • 19
  • [_PKB-] _PKB-
  • Member since:
    03-07-2014
I hate arty (highest and only non premium is German tier 8) and I played it for one day to complete HTC mission (wasn't playing, but niw I will becuse random is useless) and I will tell you this. On arty equipment is a must (rammer, GLD and vents/net) also with food, totally different game.
16:10 Added after 2 minute
@Wolfgang, IMO they won't force it or even abandon it, already too many boots.

P33K #19 Posted 30 July 2019 - 05:10 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26008 battles
  • 201
  • Member since:
    03-26-2015
Do I understand right, no more "top of exp of both teams" requirement? Very nice if so, might try to do 260-spg15 with honors then.

Newchar #20 Posted 30 July 2019 - 06:36 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 35137 battles
  • 75
  • Member since:
    04-28-2012

These "Reward-tanks" are still far away for a casual player.

 

These missions are made for 24/7 no real-life kids.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users