Jump to content


Skoda T 27 thoughts


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

Hechaton #1 Posted 09 August 2019 - 04:34 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 51734 battles
  • 201
  • Member since:
    06-25-2014

Ok, it isn't terrible but it isn't good either.

Decent gun handling must be one of the best features.

I'd say it's another "content-fill-tanks" that the game could do well without.

Had it only had a little more "ompf" pr shot, or anything that would slightly resemble turret armour it would have been something...now it's more like nothing.

What do you think?



NewForces2142 #2 Posted 09 August 2019 - 06:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14610 battles
  • 23
  • [TDARO] TDARO
  • Member since:
    02-07-2011
I think the price speaks for itself. I don't own the tank, but I've seen it in action and I think it is a decent premium tank if you are a collector.

G01ngToxicCommand0 #3 Posted 09 August 2019 - 08:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37465 battles
  • 799
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011

View PostHechaton, on 09 August 2019 - 04:34 PM, said:

Ok, it isn't terrible but it isn't good either.

Decent gun handling must be one of the best features.

I'd say it's another "content-fill-tanks" that the game could do well without.

Had it only had a little more "ompf" pr shot, or anything that would slightly resemble turret armour it would have been something...now it's more like nothing.

What do you think?


So basically it is equivalent to 3.6 Roentgen/hour ?:trollface::popcorn:


Edited by G01ngToxicCommand0, 09 August 2019 - 08:45 PM.


snowlywhite #4 Posted 09 August 2019 - 08:55 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22917 battles
  • 379
  • Member since:
    01-05-2018

it's below proseco imho

 

And proseco was free, this one isn't. Though thank God we don't have another marathon; marathon gameplay beats even weekend gameplay.

 

dunno, nothing awe inspiring. Another premium...



Nitro_Tank #5 Posted 09 August 2019 - 09:04 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 6487 battles
  • 140
  • Member since:
    08-07-2011

With the progetto i suck, with this tank i own. Doesnt really say anything about the tank in general, but i like it way more than the spaghetto 

 

Also it is a well balanced tank, just because it is worse than another tank doesnt mean that its bad.


Edited by Nitro_Tank, 09 August 2019 - 09:07 PM.


Desyatnik_Pansy #6 Posted 09 August 2019 - 09:05 PM

    Bartender

  • Player
  • 17905 battles
  • 26,458
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013
My opinion of it is that it was basically balanced as though it was releasing with the Czech line originally, rather than releasing into the game as it is today. I mean it works, it's alright but it just cries when you see a Progetto or Pantera that's basically better in every way and way more flexible because autoreloader.

snowlywhite #7 Posted 09 August 2019 - 09:36 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22917 battles
  • 379
  • Member since:
    01-05-2018

View PostNitro_Tank, on 09 August 2019 - 09:04 PM, said:

With the progetto i suck, with this tank i own. Doesnt really say anything about the tank in general, but i like it way more than the spaghetto 

 

Also it is a well balanced tank, just because it is worse than another tank doesnt mean that its bad.

 

it's a needlessly bad reload time. The ratio between reloading the drum of a tier 9-10 cz and a tier 9-10 italian(assuming the italian emptied it's whole drum too) seems very well tuned. Both lines remained valid after italians were added.

 

The ratio of this compared to proseco/pantera is sensibly worse. For... God knows what reason.



Oldewolfe #8 Posted 09 August 2019 - 09:57 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 521 battles
  • 379
  • Member since:
    10-22-2017

Straight Forward Autoloader vs Thinking Man's Reloader....       

 

I was Sworn off Autoloaders WAY Back on my First Test Server, that got Reinforced with the Ramoage Event and the AMX 50B, too much Speed and Too Fun to Drive to ever be Good at....       Then I got the Swede Heavies, because Unlike the AMX, they had Workable Armor.....     Now I have a Garage Full of them, French, Italian, Swede, and while the Czech Line wasn't even a Consideration at first, they've been Cropping Up in the back of my Mind as a Future Grind....     Guess the Future's Here....     lol

 

Now I just need to get a Crew Started in this and Move Up from the Tier 1....         The STB1 also has my Interest after playing a Deputy Account on the NA Server....       I'm gonna be a Grinding Fool again, just like the Olde Days....



r00barb #9 Posted 09 August 2019 - 10:02 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27523 battles
  • 11,092
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postsnowlywhite, on 09 August 2019 - 08:36 PM, said:

The ratio of this compared to proseco/pantera is sensibly worse. For... God knows what reason.

 

If I was to put on my cynical hat, because premium tanks can't be nerfed if they're over-performing without offering refunds whereas buffs only increase sales. Early adopters, CZ enthusiasts, collectors, etc. get it now, the rest of us get tempted when it becomes a scaled down T 50 instead of a scaled up T 25.



Hechaton #10 Posted 10 August 2019 - 01:24 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 51734 battles
  • 201
  • Member since:
    06-25-2014

I'd say i lacks at least one round in the clip.

Is it worth buying?? -NO



Negativvv #11 Posted 10 August 2019 - 05:16 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12125 battles
  • 1,558
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015

I genuinely enjoy the T9 Cz Tech Tree tank but I can't see why I'd get the T27.

 

It's slower, has worse accuracy, worse alpha, pen and clip all behind a pay wall with the small bonus of being able to bash T6 players.

 

From what I've seen CCs play of it, can almost expect 1 out of 3 shells in a clip either bounce or simply derp.



XxKuzkina_MatxX #12 Posted 10 August 2019 - 05:28 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53231 battles
  • 4,580
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostNegativvv, on 10 August 2019 - 08:16 AM, said:

I genuinely enjoy the T9 Cz Tech Tree tank but I can't see why I'd get the T27.

 

It's slower, has worse accuracy, worse alpha, pen and clip all behind a pay wall with the small bonus of being able to bash T6 players.

 

From what I've seen CCs play of it, can almost expect 1 out of 3 shells in a clip either bounce or simply derp.

 

Imagine this scenario...

 

  • A few months later it's added to the CZ tech tree.
  • It's available for gold and maybe through the trade-in.
  • Surely you can use a CZ premium autoloader especially if you've a redundant or bad premium that you don't play anymore.

 

Cool? :B



Negativvv #13 Posted 10 August 2019 - 05:32 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12125 battles
  • 1,558
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 10 August 2019 - 05:28 AM, said:

 

Imagine this scenario...

 

  • A few months later it's added to the CZ tech tree.
  • It's available for gold and maybe through the trade-in.
  • Surely you can use a CZ premium autoloader especially if you've a redundant or bad premium that you don't play anymore.

 

Cool? :B

That would be yes, my Black Market bought T34 is waiting for that day :P



TankkiPoju #14 Posted 10 August 2019 - 06:24 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22971 battles
  • 7,037
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostDesyatnik_Pansy, on 09 August 2019 - 09:05 PM, said:

My opinion of it is that it was basically balanced as though it was releasing with the Czech line originally, rather than releasing into the game as it is today. I mean it works, it's alright but it just cries when you see a Progetto or Pantera that's basically better in every way and way more flexible because autoreloader.

 

At the time Czech line was introduced the game wasn't so far in power creep downwards spiral that WG dared to add autoloader tier 8 premium tanks.

 

After Progetto 46  pretty much everything goes, and even Skoda T27 is just only "alright" now.

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users