Jump to content


Some ideas of some swedish trees.


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

deadman_38 #1 Posted 14 August 2019 - 10:03 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22442 battles
  • 114
  • [TJAEG] TJAEG
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014

Most of the tanks I put up here are from 1960-1970

the first one is the Infanterikanonvagn 91 (IKV 91). This tank should fit as a tier 10 light tank and in later versions a prototype was made with a 105mmikv 90
Strv 121 should fit as a tier 10 med or a heavy but I think it should fit better as a Heavy. strv_121-e1507841109609.jpg

And the last "tank" is the Bandkanon artillery. Should fit perfect as a tier 10 arty in the swedish tech tree. But ofcorse in the game it should not have the 14 shells in 1 minute.Bildresultat för bandkanon

Maybe alot of players will not like another arty line but if WG want to create a full tree for sweden they should have the arties  in it.



kaneloon #2 Posted 14 August 2019 - 10:11 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 30606 battles
  • 3,349
  • [UKN-A] UKN-A
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011
Nice, I would like more swedish tanks too.

Nishi_Kinuyo #3 Posted 14 August 2019 - 10:53 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 8849 battles
  • 6,069
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

Has been suggested before.

And the Strv 121 is too modern (Leopard 2).

The main issue with the IKV 91 would be the tanks leading up to it.



_SpartanWarrior_ #4 Posted 15 August 2019 - 12:59 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35781 battles
  • 369
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

Like it!

WG said they do not want modern tanks,it was supposed to be WW2 but...hey there is Strv 103B of all sudden and it is from around '70!



deadman_38 #5 Posted 15 August 2019 - 12:36 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22442 battles
  • 114
  • [TJAEG] TJAEG
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 15 August 2019 - 12:59 AM, said:

Like it!

WG said they do not want modern tanks,it was supposed to be WW2 but...hey there is Strv 103B of all sudden and it is from around '70!

SBT-1, STRV 103, M48 patton, and progetto 65 are from 1970 so why not even more from 1970.
 

11:37 Added after 0 minute

View PostNishi_Kinuyo, on 14 August 2019 - 10:53 PM, said:

Has been suggested before.

And the Strv 121 is too modern (Leopard 2).

The main issue with the IKV 91 would be the tanks leading up to it.


If WG want to keep its game in decades they should plan to take in more modern tanks because less and less will be available to put into the game. So they should maybe bring tier 11 and 12. No other companies who has tech trees has done it, so WG will be a head start in the market. 


Edited by deadman_38, 15 August 2019 - 12:37 PM.


_SpartanWarrior_ #6 Posted 15 August 2019 - 04:13 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35781 battles
  • 369
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

View Postdeadman_38, on 15 August 2019 - 05:36 AM, said:

SBT-1, STRV 103, M48 patton, and progetto 65 are from 1970 so why not even more from 1970.
 

11:37 Added after 0 minute


If WG want to keep its game in decades they should plan to take in more modern tanks because less and less will be available to put into the game. So they should maybe bring tier 11 and 12. No other companies who has tech trees has done it, so WG will be a head start in the market. 

No thanks.I know that they are from 1970,what i meant is that WG is lying too much.Patton is from 1952 so it is most likely fine,65 is from 1969,strv 103b is from 1970,STB-1 (Type-74) is from 1975 so yeah...

I would not like t11 and t12,that means more premium tanks and NO,i do not think we want armored warfare copy.We want a ww2 game with ww2 tanks,not 1990 behemoths. 



Nishi_Kinuyo #7 Posted 15 August 2019 - 04:48 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 8849 battles
  • 6,069
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 15 August 2019 - 04:13 PM, said:

No thanks.I know that they are from 1970,what i meant is that WG is lying too much.Patton is from 1952 so it is most likely fine,65 is from 1969,strv 103b is from 1970,STB-1 (Type-74) is from 1975 so yeah...

I would not like t11 and t12,that means more premium tanks and NO,i do not think we want armored warfare copy.We want a ww2 game with ww2 tanks,not 1990 behemoths. 

And the Type 74 was outdated when it entered service, thank you.

I also agree with the second sentence.

 

When I look at modern tanks lined up, I can't make tit nor arse from which is supposed to be which; they all look alike.



_SpartanWarrior_ #8 Posted 15 August 2019 - 05:22 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35781 battles
  • 369
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

View PostNishi_Kinuyo, on 15 August 2019 - 09:48 AM, said:

And the Type 74 was outdated when it entered service, thank you.

I also agree with the second sentence.

 

When I look at modern tanks lined up, I can't make tit nor arse from which is supposed to be which; they all look alike.

Thank you for agreeing lol,i just wanted to say if you want to play world of tanks with modern vehicles,go to armored warfare,do not destroy what we like,if you already have a game that looks like WoT but has modern vehicles.

Many tanks in WoT were outdated when they entered service,some of them never entered service,some of them are just blueprints and some are WG imagination,which is sad for the game.

More swedish tanks would be nice,but there is just none.

Strv 10x series are just centurions,Strv 122 is waay too modern (1997) and others..we already have them ingame. Ikv 91 is good,but as Nishi said there would be problems with tanks leading up there,since it is a light tank.

If WG EVER adds t11 and t12 that we do not want,they will have possibilities to destroy their game even more by adding strv 101 102 and 104 which are British Centurions,and they could possibly lead up to the Strv 122.

Whole tech tree revamp?Continuing from Leo,going to 101,104 and 122.Bad idea for me.Dislike.

Maybe i wrote too much things but long story short,there are no more tanks for swedish tree that arent too modern.



deadman_38 #9 Posted 15 August 2019 - 11:33 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22442 battles
  • 114
  • [TJAEG] TJAEG
  • Member since:
    10-18-2014

Okey, no tier 11 and 12, 
What about the AKV 151? the Arty was developed in 1958 and so on. 

 



Captain_Kremen0 #10 Posted 16 August 2019 - 09:02 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 38956 battles
  • 2,220
  • [TFMB] TFMB
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011

How a bout the Norway Spruce - that's a popular Swedish tree*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*other trees are available, this was just an example.



XxKuzkina_MatxX #11 Posted 16 August 2019 - 09:41 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 53231 battles
  • 4,663
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

That IKV 91 looks interesting. I like how they reached the same conclusion, technically, for armament selection as the Norwegians did.

 

The Bofors 90 mm low pressure rifled gun looks very similar, performance wise, to the french 90mm D-925 used on the super Chaffee or the NM-116. Both were low pressure producing less recoil to accommodate a lighter carriage also both fired HEAT and HE only.

 

Looks like the defense requirements were the same! :)


Edited by XxKuzkina_MatxX, 16 August 2019 - 04:09 PM.


_SpartanWarrior_ #12 Posted 16 August 2019 - 06:34 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35781 battles
  • 369
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013
Yes,IKV 91 and arty is fine (wow i said it?) BUT WHAT TANKS WILL LEAD TO IT?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users