Jump to content


K-91 efficiency of mine

K-91 Soviet Tier X MT/TD Mobility DPM Camo Gun_dep

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

lnfernaI #1 Posted 16 August 2019 - 05:12 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33646 battles
  • 4,582
  • [ICYA] ICYA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012
I would like people to rate my K-91 efficiency, and what I could possibly improve in it?

OmniWalou #2 Posted 16 August 2019 - 05:28 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 452 battles
  • 552
  • Member since:
    04-13-2019

It's bad and you should be ashamed of it.

 

Kidding. Maybe you should post to the forums the information required for a correct evaluation of your efficiency so people don't have to go in game to see them ;)



OmniWalou #3 Posted 16 August 2019 - 05:45 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 452 battles
  • 552
  • Member since:
    04-13-2019

Nevermind, I put in the effort for you, here's the in game stats of you in K-91. Pretty sure that's all from the stats side that one needs to evaluate your efficiency. Next request might be replays of you playing it.

 


Edited by OmniWalou, 16 August 2019 - 05:46 AM.


DuncaN_101 #4 Posted 16 August 2019 - 01:36 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 55586 battles
  • 2,943
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
I'm almost there need another 60k xp to unlock it. What is your impression of the tank?

arthurwellsley #5 Posted 16 August 2019 - 02:13 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 54060 battles
  • 4,018
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View PostDuncaN_101, on 16 August 2019 - 12:36 PM, said:

I'm almost there need another 60k xp to unlock it. What is your impression of the tank?

 

140/907 is a better all round medium.

 

Buffed Leopard 1 is a better camo distance sniper.

 

K-91 a bit irrelevant now?

 

I own 140, Leopard 1, and K-91.

 

It's good at what it does, but the rear turret is awkward but you already know that from playing the 430 II.


Edited by arthurwellsley, 16 August 2019 - 02:14 PM.


SaintMaddenus #6 Posted 16 August 2019 - 02:21 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 37681 battles
  • 2,411
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    03-04-2011
your stun damage is well below par :hiding:

lnfernaI #7 Posted 16 August 2019 - 04:58 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33646 battles
  • 4,582
  • [ICYA] ICYA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View PostOmniWalou, on 16 August 2019 - 06:45 AM, said:

Nevermind, I put in the effort for you, here's the in game stats of you in K-91. Pretty sure that's all from the stats side that one needs to evaluate your efficiency. Next request might be replays of you playing it.

I apparently have only a single replay on it, and that was ~ a week ago. Most replays featuring it are not exactly a blast to watch, considering it's nature.

 

And thanks.

 

View PostDuncaN_101, on 16 August 2019 - 02:36 PM, said:

What is your impression of the tank?

IMO, it combines the gimmicks of soviet mediums having decent mobility, camo and high DPM. What sets it apart from most of them and pretty much all other Tier X mediums except UDES, is it's ''supposedly'' laser-accuracy, fast aimtime, and 4000 DPM (achieve-able) and it having -9 gun depression over the sides, which leads to some pretty funny positioning at times, but it can really surprise enemies, who do not expect soviet tanks having any use-able gun depression.

 

The armor is quite weak, although it can side-scrape, and turret can have many trollish bounces, especially when wiggling, although it does not turn 360 degrees. 

 

tl;dr If you like TDs, you will like it. Otherwise, not really. It's by no means a conventional medium tank, but it can take that role. It can also spot.

 

View Postarthurwellsley, on 16 August 2019 - 03:13 PM, said:

 

140/907 is a better all round medium.

 

Buffed Leopard 1 is a better camo distance sniper.

 

K-91 a bit irrelevant now?

1. take the 907 broken trash out of any balance discussion. It's a tank that majority do not have. It's well known that it's terribly balanced, and Tier 8 practically stand no chance against it.

1.2. Obj.140 is a conventional MT, K-91 really isn't. Having a turret already makes the Obj.140 better, but it has less gun depression by a large margin.

 

2. I suppose they are kinda on par, Leo simply trades better now,and that is it really, along with having better mobility. It still does not have the K-91's gimmick armor, and is as paper, as ever, has no access to K-91's supersonic APCR, and is overall larger in terms of profile and has much lower DPM. 

 

There are some situations in which a K-91 will do much, much better. But it's up to preference.

 

3. Nah not really. It's a sort-of gimmick tank. Everyone who plays the line since Tier 7, and has some brains, understands what they are going for.

View PostSaintMaddenus, on 16 August 2019 - 03:21 PM, said:

your stun damage is well below par :hiding:

whenever lefefefefe gets stun on it's 105mm, I will raise that for your viewing pleasure. :girl:


Edited by lnfernaI, 16 August 2019 - 04:59 PM.


marepbc #8 Posted 16 August 2019 - 05:07 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 65957 battles
  • 105
  • [ONA] ONA
  • Member since:
    12-02-2011
Decently mediocre and slightly above. Not really anything good, but not awfully bad either. You are doing decent job in general, but nothing special. You have the 2 marks which means you are doing something usefull in this pos of tank and that you are even maybe enjoying playing it?

lnfernaI #9 Posted 16 August 2019 - 05:11 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33646 battles
  • 4,582
  • [ICYA] ICYA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View Postmarepbc, on 16 August 2019 - 06:07 PM, said:

that you are even maybe enjoying playing it?

How enlightened of you.

 

Yes, I am a major TD player. (read as - not redline trash).



NekoPuffer_PPP #10 Posted 16 August 2019 - 05:27 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 33755 battles
  • 3,888
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View PostlnfernaI, on 16 August 2019 - 06:12 AM, said:

I would like people to rate my K-91 efficiency, and what I could possibly improve in it?

 

Decent stats. Nothing extreme, nothing too bad or too good. Nice hitrate though, I'm guessing you don't take a lot of blindshots?... I made a habit of firing at bushes just after the match starts, it pays off often enough.



lnfernaI #11 Posted 16 August 2019 - 08:19 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33646 battles
  • 4,582
  • [ICYA] ICYA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 16 August 2019 - 06:27 PM, said:

 

Decent stats. Nothing extreme, nothing too bad or too good. Nice hitrate though, I'm guessing you don't take a lot of blindshots?... I made a habit of firing at bushes just after the match starts, it pays off often enough.

Not really worth it, at least not on K-91. The shells run out rather quickly in a prolonged match.



DuncaN_101 #12 Posted 16 August 2019 - 10:50 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 55586 battles
  • 2,943
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View Postarthurwellsley, on 16 August 2019 - 02:13 PM, said:

 

140/907 is a better all round medium.

 

Buffed Leopard 1 is a better camo distance sniper.

 

K-91 a bit irrelevant now?

 

I own 140, Leopard 1, and K-91.

 

It's good at what it does, but the rear turret is awkward but you already know that from playing the 430 II.

 

i know this arthur ... but since I already have the 62a, 140, 430U, 907... i might aswell complete the set amiright? ;)



8126Jakobsson #13 Posted 17 August 2019 - 09:05 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 77843 battles
  • 4,959
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

1,5 spot and 928 assist is a bit too low to my taste. And if you're playing it as the damage farming backside sniper then the damage is. Try turning your offense up 12,5%

 

Spoiler

 



lnfernaI #14 Posted 17 August 2019 - 12:07 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33646 battles
  • 4,582
  • [ICYA] ICYA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 17 August 2019 - 10:05 AM, said:

1,5 spot and 928 assist is a bit too low to my taste. And if you're playing it as the damage farming backside sniper then the damage is. Try turning your offense up 12,5%

The K-91 disagrees to your demands.

Have the WG turn it into a soviet batchat, then I will start being more active.

 

Speaking seriously though, the tank is, as I already mentioned, by no means a conventional medium tank. It's a TD disguised as a MT. Think of it as the E 25 three tiers higher, if it had a semi-turret, and was a bit slower.


Edited by lnfernaI, 17 August 2019 - 02:12 PM.


DuncaN_101 #15 Posted 18 August 2019 - 04:05 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 55586 battles
  • 2,943
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
another 12k to go and i'll have the set complete again. Gotta love those blueprints

DuncaN_101 #16 Posted 19 August 2019 - 04:35 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 55586 battles
  • 2,943
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

aaaaannnddd done K-91 is in the collection now.

 

had one game in it and its not bad actually. different but not bad.



lnfernaI #17 Posted 20 August 2019 - 09:27 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33646 battles
  • 4,582
  • [ICYA] ICYA
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View PostDuncaN_101, on 19 August 2019 - 05:35 PM, said:

aaaaannnddd done K-91 is in the collection now.

 

had one game in it and its not bad actually. different but not bad.

so different!



DuncaN_101 #18 Posted 21 August 2019 - 08:10 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 55586 battles
  • 2,943
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
I like it tho




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users