Jump to content


Strongholds Format on tier X - 15v15/10v10?

Strongholds Boxes 10v10 15v15

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

Poll: Tier X SH Format (717 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

If CW+Advances are 15v15, should normal SH also be 15v15?

  1. Yes - I would like to see 15v15 SH reintroduced (592 votes [82.57%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 82.57%

  2. No - I prefer to stick with 10v10 SH at tier X (125 votes [17.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 17.43%

Vote Hide poll

Troll_Da_Bot #21 Posted 10 September 2019 - 12:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34484 battles
  • 4
  • [RE-AP] RE-AP
  • Member since:
    11-29-2012
Exactly this 10vs10 mode is really really bad and annoying. No brain meta, like 1-2 EBR, 3-4-5 chiefs, and the rest 907... Boooring. Artys are out of the CW and SH meta, in this 10vs10 format clans cant use artys, because if they use, they are probably lost. Many-many situation tanks are also out of the meta, like E3-E4, strv, maybe some tvp. Its bad and its not the great choice. So in my opinion, WG need to make the 15vs15 back. 

FidelisRaven #22 Posted 12 September 2019 - 06:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 39894 battles
  • 568
  • [WHO] WHO
  • Member since:
    05-23-2012
Make 15v15 great again! 

popi42 #23 Posted 14 September 2019 - 07:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35409 battles
  • 7
  • [SUMEC] SUMEC
  • Member since:
    02-27-2015
10v10 je super, ak by chcel wg vyhovieť hráčom tak by spustil možnosť oboje 15v15 aj 10v10. Nech si zahrá každý. Pamätám keď sa aj globálka hrala s "VI" tier. Je to hra tak prečo to obmedzovať.

Mydlifousek #24 Posted 14 September 2019 - 09:08 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16601 battles
  • 34
  • Member since:
    12-29-2012

View Post__FANY__, on 28 August 2019 - 04:41 PM, said:

10v10 is best in SH, 15v15 is best in Advances


signed







Also tagged with Strongholds, Boxes, 10v10, 15v15

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users