Jump to content


What tank you choose to Win a random battle?

Balance Centurion Tiger Tiger2

  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

Poll: What is a Better Tank? (74 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

You want to play and WIN a Random battle today, you can choose only one Tank:

  1. Centurion 1 (36 votes [48.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 48.65%

  2. Tiger 2 (38 votes [51.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 51.35%

Vote Hide poll

4nt #41 Posted 30 August 2019 - 01:26 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29493 battles
  • 1,605
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013

Both are meh at best. Which means I love both to bits :) Still it feels little like comparing apples to beets.

Out of two I got along better with Tiger II. Partial reason is that cent was the first t8 I got, but also because I like to sidescrape, which IMO is more useful than ridgefighting on average map.

Other factors are Tigers better gun, sometimes useful front hull, and cheaper running costs. Cent is just for funsies, troll turret doesn't really make for abysmally bad gun handling, expensive ammo, ammoracks as hull armor or tarpit like mobility.

 

If I really want to win a random match I'd take pantera, t-44 or KV-4.


Edited by 4nt, 30 August 2019 - 01:27 PM.


LordMuffin #42 Posted 30 August 2019 - 04:37 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 53497 battles
  • 13,409
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View Posttajj7, on 30 August 2019 - 11:40 AM, said:

 

Considering he said -

 

 

And even his poll is not supporting that, I am sure he will come up with some other excuse as to why he is not wrong.

 

But to be honest both tanks aren't good and there are loads of tanks on tier 8 I would rather play. 

 

And everyone knows the Tiger 2 needs a buff, but its not as bad as people make out, I mean look at the Panther 88 or Panther 2 for example - 

 

Posted Image

 

They make the Tiger 2 look like a Defender in comparison. 

 

It looks like getting 60%+ WR on the Panther 8.8 might be a challenge then.



Dorander #43 Posted 30 August 2019 - 04:46 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21025 battles
  • 6,042
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012
Voted Tiger 2, just because OP started complaining about people on the first page and I want to give him a chance to keep complaining on page 3.

Innapropriate_Username #44 Posted 30 August 2019 - 06:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 12369 battles
  • 765
  • Member since:
    12-12-2015

View Postbarison1, on 30 August 2019 - 10:40 AM, said:

OP will still see it that way as all tiger 2 votes are all tajj7 frends that make up fantasy bias stats to defend wg :trollface::trollface::trollface::trollface:

*edit

 

View Posttajj7, on 30 August 2019 - 11:40 AM, said:

But to be honest both tanks aren't good and there are loads of tanks on tier 8 I would rather play.

And everyone knows the Tiger 2 needs a buff, but its not as bad as people make out, I mean look at the Panther 88 or Panther 2 for example - 

They make the Tiger 2 look like a Defender in comparison. 

 

You stumbled onto something here... Whole pool is a result of one tiny part of whole different discussion,

and people like you noticed things like Panther2, some others noticed that one is a Heavy and other is a Medium tank... so...

 

It is silly to compare a HEAVY TANK with a MEDIUM, but let the poll be, well will work with what we have,

 

But when you remembered that Panther is in the game, PLEASE, be a good boy and pull up some tarot wincharts for this tanks, PLEASE I BEG YOU!

lets compare;

 

Centurion1 (Centurion5/1)    - vs  -   Panther 2  (Panther88)

 

and

 

Caernavron     -  vs  -  Tiger2

 

Oh, and...

You can add the DEFENDER in the second chart... just so we can see is Caern closer to the Tiger2 or Defender... :popcorn:

 

 


Edited by DarkAri, 30 August 2019 - 07:22 PM.
Please stay on topic about tanks


Flubber42 #45 Posted 30 August 2019 - 07:56 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30893 battles
  • 71
  • [UKPK] UKPK
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

Centurion I because 58% win rate vs 48% in the Tiger II.

 

If I really want to win in any tank: AMX 12t



Synapze #46 Posted 30 August 2019 - 08:12 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3062 battles
  • 323
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    09-21-2014

I voted for the Tiger 2. In this meta of corridor maps hull armor is vital and the Tiger 2 has way more hull armor. Also with so many high alpha guns in the game you need the extra HP the Tiger 2 has in comparison to the Centurion.These two factors make the Tiger 2 way more OP than the Centurion, and will always get my vote.



barison1 #47 Posted 31 August 2019 - 12:55 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 44233 battles
  • 2,317
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    01-14-2012

View PostInnapropriate_Username, on 30 August 2019 - 06:13 PM, said:

 

It is silly to compare a HEAVY TANK with a MEDIUM, but let the poll be, well will work with what we have,

 

 

ironic that you are now trying to defend yourself as your poll didnt give the results you wanted



15JG52Brauer #48 Posted 31 August 2019 - 02:34 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 81924 battles
  • 752
  • [WHO] WHO
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011
For me it has to be the cent, because I just prefer to play a ridgeline if I can - and alhoughI loved the Tiger II back in the day - I feel it whas aged alittle bit worse than the cent has -that or I can compensate more for the changes to the cents relative powecreep with a ridgeline more than I can compensate for a Tiger II's weakness to prem spam with sidescaping... although who am I kidding - I'd just get in my S51 and use them both as gunmark fodder ;-)





Also tagged with Balance, Centurion, Tiger, Tiger2

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users