Jump to content


FV4005 - hello? Why is this tank still in the game?


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

APoliticallyCorrectName #1 Posted 31 August 2019 - 10:24 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 29433 battles
  • 66
  • Member since:
    05-21-2015

Dear WARGAMING.

 

You made thousands of people grind through a horrible BRITISH (we now you rashans hate the brits) tank destroyer line in order to get the previously quite balanced fv4005. Then all of a sudden you decide to nerf everything about it. Now it is equivalent to a tier 10 artillery without the overpowered ww2 satellite bomber mode and stun mechanic but with a bit more HP, much bigger silhuette and less armor and speed. It's even underpowered for an artillery without satellite mode and stun. Sooooo.... How many years will it take for you to fix this? Who will give me back my hours of grinding the crapBRITISH line? I bought premium account and stuff from you expecting one product but you gave me a much shittier product than promised. It's like buying a nice steak in the store for a lot of money and then the store owner comes and injects it with poison just after you pay for it... This is [edited]. Please fix your game.



NekoPuffer_PPP #2 Posted 31 August 2019 - 10:30 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 34129 battles
  • 3,985
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

It was overperforming before the nerf. Wildly overperforming.

 

 

If you think it's bad, check out the FV 215b 183.



barison1 #3 Posted 31 August 2019 - 10:31 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 43589 battles
  • 2,062
  • Member since:
    01-14-2012

archer is mhe

achilles is mhe

challenger is great

charioteer is great

conway is decent

 

doesnt seem a that horrible line

 

also fv4005 is far from balanced, im not saying it was OP before but just plain stupid broken(still is tho). it could been rebalanced in other ways with lower alpha and decently good accuracy



4nt #4 Posted 31 August 2019 - 10:54 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29234 battles
  • 1,584
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013
For memes. Just like 50% of all tanks.

Dorander #5 Posted 31 August 2019 - 11:03 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21025 battles
  • 6,032
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012
The game was fixed a little, the day the FV4005 got nerfed. Of course they nerfed it wrong but I have no sympathy for people who no longer enjoy that poorly designed piece of junk. I do agree with the title, I'd vastly prefer it simply not in the game as being targeted by a one-shot slotmachine is no fun at all.

24doom24 #6 Posted 01 September 2019 - 09:56 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8354 battles
  • 417
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View Postbarison1, on 31 August 2019 - 09:31 PM, said:

archer is mhe

achilles is mhe

challenger is great

charioteer is great

conway is decent

 

doesnt seem a that horrible line

 

also fv4005 is far from balanced, im not saying it was OP before but just plain stupid broken(still is tho). it could been rebalanced in other ways with lower alpha and decently good accuracy

What? It's perfectly balanced wdym. Its paper and huge and look how slow it reverses. Never had trouble with them. Maybe it's just you:child:



Ricky_Rolls #7 Posted 01 September 2019 - 11:08 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 72173 battles
  • 1,777
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010
Wait, there are peoples that genuinely believe that the 4005 should be buffed? Really? This kind of tank shouldn't even be into the game in the first place.

shikaka9 #8 Posted 01 September 2019 - 11:11 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 70629 battles
  • 958
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013

View PostAPoliticallyCorrectName, on 31 August 2019 - 09:24 PM, said:

Dear WARGAMING.

 

How many years will it take for you to fix this? 

 

14 years



barison1 #9 Posted 01 September 2019 - 12:41 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 43589 battles
  • 2,062
  • Member since:
    01-14-2012

View Post24doom24, on 01 September 2019 - 09:56 AM, said:

What? It's perfectly balanced wdym. Its paper and huge and look how slow it reverses. Never had trouble with them. Maybe it's just you:child:


you just perfectly supported my opinion, only forgot to add dice roll hesh



splash_time #10 Posted 01 September 2019 - 12:53 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12847 battles
  • 406
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-20-2018

I don't know, not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone, but big alpha tanks, higher than 750, it's just extra....

I mean, a tank with 750 alpha is already good for a high pen gun.

So why even adding such tank? Then nurf it to the ground? Seriously.

WG never thinks about how the tanks can effect the game. Look at FV 183 B for example, slower, but same old gun stats...

It's really not nice to be one shooted, but it's already in the game.

So, they should decrease the alpha, fix the traverse speed and accuracy. There you go, you'll have a good tank with good accuracy and alpha, but not armor, so gl. Done. :/


Edited by splash_time, 01 September 2019 - 12:54 PM.


MarcoStrapone #11 Posted 01 September 2019 - 01:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42138 battles
  • 921
  • [-BOMB] -BOMB
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

"Who will give me back my hours of grinding the crapBRITISH line?"

social security :amazed:



Denton_0451 #12 Posted 01 September 2019 - 01:42 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26256 battles
  • 1,824
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 31 August 2019 - 10:30 PM, said:

It was overperforming before the nerf. Wildly overperforming.

 

This is wildly overperforming


 

This is slightly underperforming

 



lnfernaI #13 Posted 02 September 2019 - 06:05 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33938 battles
  • 4,757
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012


SuNo_TeSLa #14 Posted 02 September 2019 - 06:16 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 48511 battles
  • 470
  • [SWEPH] SWEPH
  • Member since:
    07-07-2013
Another one...

pihip #15 Posted 02 September 2019 - 10:45 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15904 battles
  • 1,185
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View PostAPoliticallyCorrectName, on 31 August 2019 - 10:24 PM, said:

quite balanced FV4005

 

:teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy:

How is a tank with direct fire arty gun that can oneshot Tier 9s if the dice roll say yes "balanced"?

FV should've never existed in this game period, and WG actually admitting that its best asset is the gold ammo is even more reason to laugh at them (for adding such a piece of crap to the game) and at FV players (given that 99% FV players carry full HESH cancer).

The game as it is now stinks like an unwashed latrine, but at least the nerfs to FV and Type 5 are a step in the right direction.



lnfernaI #16 Posted 02 September 2019 - 10:48 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33938 battles
  • 4,757
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View Postpihip, on 02 September 2019 - 11:45 AM, said:

 

:teethhappy::teethhappy::teethhappy:

How is a tank with direct fire arty gun that can oneshot Tier 9s if the dice roll say yes "balanced"?

It's obviously balanced to go and randomly click tanks for 500-100% of their hp.



splash_time #17 Posted 02 September 2019 - 12:28 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12847 battles
  • 406
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-20-2018

View PostlnfernaI, on 02 September 2019 - 01:18 PM, said:

It's obviously balanced to go and randomly click tanks for 500-100% of their hp.

No, don't say this, WG is satisfied, FV even with the netfs, it still a death star, it still have that high damage.

And i don't think WG is planning to nerf the damage at all.

I'm wondering, what will WG choose as next  new added tank? A TD with 3000 damage that fires each 2 mins?


Edited by splash_time, 02 September 2019 - 12:31 PM.


barison1 #18 Posted 02 September 2019 - 12:42 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 43589 battles
  • 2,062
  • Member since:
    01-14-2012

View Postsplash_time, on 02 September 2019 - 12:28 PM, said:

No, don't say this, WG is satisfied, FV even with the netfs, it still a death star, it still have that high damage.

And i don't think WG is planning to nerf the damage at all.

I'm wondering, what will WG choose as next  new added tank? A TD with 3000 damage that fires each 2 mins?


they kinda did that already in the past, remember the good old unnerfed wte100 (after nerfs it was still plenty stupid, good it was removed)

 

128mm – 560 damage, 6 shell autoloader, time between shots 2 secs, autoloader loads 60 secs (3360 clip dmg)
150mm – 750 damage, 4 shell autoloader, time between shots 3 secs, autoloader loads 50 secs (3k clip dmg)



Dr_Oolen #19 Posted 02 September 2019 - 01:23 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 23509 battles
  • 1,915
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View Postbarison1, on 31 August 2019 - 10:31 PM, said:

archer is mhe

achilles is mhe

challenger is great

charioteer is great

conway is decent

 

doesnt seem a that horrible line

 

also fv4005 is far from balanced, im not saying it was OP before but just plain stupid broken(still is tho). it could been rebalanced in other ways with lower alpha and decently good accuracy

archer is bad

achilles is good

challenger is ok

charioteer is good

conway is bad

4005 is bad

 

4005 shouldnt be buffed, it should be removed

conway should get buffed

archer should get buffed (just buff mobility/maneuvrability)

 

rest can easily stay as it is



GrannyPanties #20 Posted 02 September 2019 - 04:44 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 1136 battles
  • 123
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

View PostDr_Oolen, on 02 September 2019 - 02:23 PM, said:

archer is bad

achilles is good

challenger is ok

charioteer is good

conway is bad

4005 is bad

 

4005 shouldnt be buffed, it should be removed

conway should get buffed

archer should get buffed (just buff mobility/maneuvrability)

 

rest can easily stay as it is


I think the tier 10 should be replaced by Fv4005 stage 1 for that lol factor






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users