Jump to content


WG Fest: New Styles and The Offspring!


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 02 September 2019 - 06:00 AM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 32,105
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
The WG Fest always comes with some surprises!

The full text of the news item

Pistol_Only #2 Posted 02 September 2019 - 06:06 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 340 battles
  • 69
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

monetisation through tanks cosmetics is the right thing to do.

might be a lucrative way as soon as you stop offering those ugly ones.



Maschinenkanone #3 Posted 02 September 2019 - 06:35 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 46306 battles
  • 473
  • [MBEV] MBEV
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012

View PostPistol_Only, on 02 September 2019 - 05:06 AM, said:

monetisation through tanks cosmetics is the right thing to do.

might be a lucrative way as soon as you stop offering those ugly ones.


Exactly. Personally I prefer military camos. No money for fantasy ones.



wsatnutter #4 Posted 02 September 2019 - 06:53 AM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 26590 battles
  • 9,572
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
how much

8126Jakobsson #5 Posted 02 September 2019 - 07:16 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 81388 battles
  • 5,692
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
too much 

Simona2k #6 Posted 02 September 2019 - 07:41 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 2970 battles
  • 1,027
  • [AP1S] AP1S
  • Member since:
    10-01-2017
beautiful camouflages

Jumping_Turtle #7 Posted 02 September 2019 - 07:46 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 71139 battles
  • 8,072
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View PostMaschinenkanone, on 02 September 2019 - 06:35 AM, said:


Exactly. Personally I prefer military camos. No money for fantasy ones.

 

This. These are really too ugly for words.



FrantisekBascovansky #8 Posted 02 September 2019 - 08:13 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33815 battles
  • 867
  • Member since:
    03-26-2018
Nice camo, outrageous price.

Cataphractarii #9 Posted 02 September 2019 - 08:46 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36842 battles
  • 286
  • [E-VO] E-VO
  • Member since:
    07-13-2012
At some point the camo stops being camo and becomes a way to pimp your ride, next come oversized tracks, illuminated turrets, engines sticking out of the deck and re-title the game truck wars :harp:

Rustybolt #10 Posted 02 September 2019 - 09:19 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17292 battles
  • 270
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

I have no problem with this way of monetisation.....better this than OP or fantasy tanks.

Bring out some historically accurate camos and I might indulge.


Edited by Rustybolt, 02 September 2019 - 09:20 AM.


Miepie #11 Posted 02 September 2019 - 09:24 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4902 battles
  • 1,457
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018

View PostCataphractarii, on 02 September 2019 - 08:46 AM, said:

At some point the camo stops being camo and becomes a way to pimp your ride, next come oversized tracks, illuminated turrets, engines sticking out of the deck and re-title the game truck wars :harp:

Well, the hydropneumatic suspension that gets added to everything in 2019 is a nice start... :great:

 



StinkyCamper #12 Posted 02 September 2019 - 09:26 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27139 battles
  • 521
  • [SCBL] SCBL
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013
This is a new low in your run for money wargaming. Congrats. i exepect this kind of cammo from now on:

Edited by StinkyCamper, 02 September 2019 - 09:26 AM.


gunslingerXXX #13 Posted 02 September 2019 - 09:38 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 13390 battles
  • 3,576
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
The orange one is pretty bad. Why the big black dots? Other two I like. 

PipeHugger #14 Posted 02 September 2019 - 09:55 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13235 battles
  • 101
  • [BOF] BOF
  • Member since:
    10-04-2015
Please state which tank tiers (and whether premium only) the camos can be applied to otherwise this just looks tawdry. Historical camos would be appreciated far more than this junk.

Edited by PipeHugger, 02 September 2019 - 09:55 AM.


oo0oo0oooo0oo0o #15 Posted 02 September 2019 - 09:58 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27818 battles
  • 166
  • Member since:
    03-28-2016
Are they historical or can people disable them?

Jumping_Turtle #16 Posted 02 September 2019 - 10:26 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 71139 battles
  • 8,072
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View PostStinkyCamper, on 02 September 2019 - 09:26 AM, said:

This is a new low in your run for money wargaming. Congrats. i exepect this kind of cammo from now on:

 

Would be great wouldn't it :

 



SlyMeerkat #17 Posted 02 September 2019 - 10:42 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18679 battles
  • 3,273
  • [-RLD-] -RLD-
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Nice

Miepie #18 Posted 02 September 2019 - 10:43 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4902 battles
  • 1,457
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018

View PostJumping_Turtle, on 02 September 2019 - 10:26 AM, said:

 

Would be great wouldn't it :

 

Note to self: do not let the GF catch a glimpse of this, or I'll be badgered into making this my priority grind... :ohmy:


Edited by Miepie, 02 September 2019 - 12:55 PM.


TungstenHitman #19 Posted 02 September 2019 - 11:12 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 31122 battles
  • 6,174
  • [B_M_G] B_M_G
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016
The Steel Hunter camo that's being sold is many times better looking. At least it has a slightly worn steel metal look and somewhat natural looking so it makes a tank look attractive and almost bare without any paint at all. These offerings just look terrible and naff(imo)

TijgernootTank #20 Posted 02 September 2019 - 11:22 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 54537 battles
  • 378
  • [TOURN] TOURN
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013

WG Fest : Overpriced cosmetics and a crap band of old sissies .

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users