Jump to content


Public Test 1.6.1 - General feedback

1.6.1

  • Please log in to reply
90 replies to this topic

r3mision #41 Posted 07 September 2019 - 03:41 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 23363 battles
  • 56
  • Member since:
    12-07-2016

What about MM? 5-7 scouts per team in tier X battle is ok? 

When new MM? in next 10 years?

Attached Files

  • Attached File   shot_004.jpg   78.84K


Ville67 #42 Posted 07 September 2019 - 04:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23375 battles
  • 282
  • [-NPS-] -NPS-
  • Member since:
    08-05-2013

View PostBatelGeuce, on 07 September 2019 - 09:33 AM, said:

 

True that.

 

 

Does 279 really need a nerf? I mean I don't have it but it doesn't look OP enough to be bothered with a nerf for it. A buff for chinese LT and T110E5 rework would be nice though (as well as E-100 but I don't believe in this one anymore).

Are we talking about the same tank? Obj. 279 (e) is the last reward tank for the personal missions, and it's the most OP tier 10 heavy tank by far. It's weakest point of armor is 270mm, it's not that slow and the gun is good.



InginerChimist #43 Posted 07 September 2019 - 04:54 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 22458 battles
  • 32
  • [GO-HA] GO-HA
  • Member since:
    04-08-2014

what have u done with t95 chief?

:))) is this a joke? i played 50 battles in the past 1 week, and the most dmg blocked was like 1000,

light tier 8 pens me in the hull ...like constant.

and in the turret i get every single shot from close range.

wtf is this?

slow tank with low hp, crappenetration and now NO ARMOR? wtf??????



superfly2000 #44 Posted 07 September 2019 - 05:07 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 80749 battles
  • 1,641
  • [SFLY] SFLY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2011
Nice, but ranked still is a toxic mode that still only caters to the egocentricity which is already prevalent in abundance in the game.

vixu #45 Posted 07 September 2019 - 05:36 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 44857 battles
  • 3,624
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011

View Postsuperfly2000, on 07 September 2019 - 05:07 PM, said:

Nice, but ranked still is a toxic mode that still only caters to the egocentricity which is already prevalent in abundance in the game.

Until they remove the possibility of losing the chevrons this mode is not worth touching.



baratoz1701 #46 Posted 07 September 2019 - 06:41 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25075 battles
  • 216
  • [FA1LZ] FA1LZ
  • Member since:
    05-31-2012

last month was the first time i played less than around 400-500 games, and i only managed around 50. I've lost the "fun" element, mainly i guess cuz there's nothing i want to grind atm. The "incremental" patch as you call it has basically no features, cuz styles get added quite often, and they don't require patches.  

 

WG seem's to have totally lost the plot. People want a BALANCED game, with new/reworked old maps, and occasional new line to grind. I understand the need for styles, to make money etc (it is a business after all), but if the playerbase shrinks due to problems with the game, styles aren't gna sell. 

 

Even though i type here, I know it's futile aswell. As i've said before, nothing ever happens based on what the playerbase in EU suggests, only if RU server complains do they listen (e.g. obj430u reverted nerfs.) 


Edited by baratoz1701, 07 September 2019 - 06:42 PM.


Maschinenkanone #47 Posted 07 September 2019 - 07:35 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 44243 battles
  • 383
  • [MBEV] MBEV
  • Member since:
    05-17-2012

RE: NEW CAMO STYLES

 

Generally, I applaud the intention to introduce more camo pattern or sets. Nice!  However, I see a fantasy Jäger emblem on the historical Jäger Camo Style. Please remove this and ensure that only historical (or at least historically and militarily plausible) emblems are added (or avoid adding non-standard emblems in the first place).

 

 

RE: MULTINATIONAL TANKS

 

Great Idea!


Edited by Maschinenkanone, 07 September 2019 - 07:39 PM.


Weak_man #48 Posted 07 September 2019 - 08:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 7458 battles
  • 917
  • [AMURG] AMURG
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017

View PostInginerChimist, on 07 September 2019 - 05:54 PM, said:

what have u done with t95 chief?

:))) is this a joke? i played 50 battles in the past 1 week, and the most dmg blocked was like 1000,

light tier 8 pens me in the hull ...like constant.

and in the turret i get every single shot from close range.

wtf is this?

slow tank with low hp, crappenetration and now NO ARMOR? wtf??????


Maybe you received a fake Chieftain like my 430U.  Sometimes tier 8 penn you like a light tank.

19:03 Added after 1 minute

View Postvixu, on 07 September 2019 - 06:36 PM, said:

Until they remove the possibility of losing the chevrons this mode is not worth touching.


Yes, this or more steps from where cannot drop will make this mode (ranked)  and steel hunter better

19:11 Added after 9 minute

View Postbaratoz1701, on 07 September 2019 - 07:41 PM, said:

last month was the first time i played less than around 400-500 games, and i only managed around 50. I've lost the "fun" element, mainly i guess cuz there's nothing i want to grind atm. The "incremental" patch as you call it has basically no features, cuz styles get added quite often, and they don't require patches.  

 

WG seem's to have totally lost the plot. People want a BALANCED game, with new/reworked old maps, and occasional new line to grind. I understand the need for styles, to make money etc (it is a business after all), but if the playerbase shrinks due to problems with the game, styles aren't gna sell. 

 

Even though i type here, I know it's futile aswell. As i've said before, nothing ever happens based on what the playerbase in EU suggests, only if RU server complains do they listen (e.g. obj430u reverted nerfs.) 


Took them months to nerf 268.4 and in 10 years after will loose more than 500000  players they will limit arty to 1/ team, will balance "mine"  map and other maps where 1 side always loose. And in this time when they will fix several problems will create twice as much new problems. Not even most modern 2019 tanks cannot snipe shot like 68 years old wheeled EBR's.

 

They can do this but doesn't want to do it.

 


Edited by Weak_man, 07 September 2019 - 08:12 PM.


_SturmGun_ #49 Posted 08 September 2019 - 07:19 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22891 battles
  • 114
  • Member since:
    07-27-2013

Another useless patch.... why would anyone care about multinational tanks???

Where is the bond shop?

Where is the buff for the weaker nations like Germany, China, USA?? 

WG don't you realise that players are leaving the game?? Are you blinded by the greed?? 

SHAME


Edited by _SturmGun_, 08 September 2019 - 07:20 AM.


Vingfire #50 Posted 08 September 2019 - 08:16 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1349 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    08-11-2019
New player here--In the game client news update it said eligibility cut-off was on Sep 2. Does that mean that the first readily available notification for players that the test server is online comes AFTER the chance to sign up for it? Like, can I participate if I just found out it's online or am I shunned?

baratoz1701 #51 Posted 08 September 2019 - 09:00 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25075 battles
  • 216
  • [FA1LZ] FA1LZ
  • Member since:
    05-31-2012

View PostVingfire, on 08 September 2019 - 07:16 AM, said:

New player here--In the game client news update it said eligibility cut-off was on Sep 2. Does that mean that the first readily available notification for players that the test server is online comes AFTER the chance to sign up for it? Like, can I participate if I just found out it's online or am I shunned?

 

pretty sure that's eligibility for new accounts, so if ur account was created before sep 2 it should work....

 

 

OH ur a reroll. Work it out urself



Sebastijan_Herceg #52 Posted 08 September 2019 - 09:35 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 8535 battles
  • 2
  • [HR_CM] HR_CM
  • Member since:
    07-22-2016

Gg WG, u have amazing service. So basically i cant log in into common test, cuz retarded russians arent able to make their service somewhat playable. I want to log in to common test, but i cant cuz my password is "incorrect", even tho its correct on live servers. 

 

FIX THAT U IDIOTS



Czesare #53 Posted 08 September 2019 - 12:11 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10551 battles
  • 13
  • [GIFTD] GIFTD
  • Member since:
    03-18-2016

View PostwardaddyMMV, on 07 September 2019 - 03:35 AM, said:

Rank does not matter anymore, if you don't have a clan reward tank like the fv / chieftan, obj (WTF) 907 or object 279 e.

Then you have a weaker tier 10 tank.

The normal tier 10 tanks don't have change against those things. Clan reward tanks are in ever way better, they are tier 10.8 or tier 11 tanks.
The shoot faster, aim faster, much better RNG.

That new FV/chieftain tank shoots like over 400M, on the commander hatch how many times you think it hits 

Obj 279e is probably a tier 12 tank, that thing has almost no weak points. It is just like the TD obj 268.4 from a couple of years ago. 

All well ad least there are small rewards that is kinda cool. 


Mostly true, 907 isnt a good tank for ranked, u'll just get penned by everyone. and they dont get better RNG. But its true that without Chief/260/279e u'll have to try a whole lot harder

 



Czesare #54 Posted 08 September 2019 - 12:23 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10551 battles
  • 13
  • [GIFTD] GIFTD
  • Member since:
    03-18-2016

View PostWeak_man, on 07 September 2019 - 03:10 PM, said:

Every player if is good enough can get 260 and 279 (e), but many players have 907 and chieftains just because fight 5 battles in a good clan and after that bid with bonds.

 

I am sure that many 907 and Chieftains owners that play these tanks in randoms are not capable to do the missions for 279 (e) and this is a problem.

Players that get with their own forces 260 and 279 (e) deserve that, but not all players deserve Chieftains and 907 to laugh about players with regular tanks in randoms and ranked.

Make missions for 907 and Chieftain or block them in randoms and ranked.

 


Okay look, the missions for the 297e arent skill based, they are 99% RNG if u get them. Then if u think that players that get CW reward tanks dont deserve them as much as players that get the 279e thats mostly BS, sure top clan wont have to try and get those CW tanks, But thats because they are the best players, wich rewards them same like u said with the 279e, good players get rewarded. and the non top clans have to play ALOT, every night to get it.

I do agree that the buying a spot in a clan with real money to get a reward tank or just playing 5 battles(in any clan, doesnt have to be good clan) and doing auction isnt really based of skill. The only problem is just that these OP tanks are a thing in the first place

11:25 Added after 2 minute

View Postvixu, on 07 September 2019 - 05:36 PM, said:

Until they remove the possibility of losing the chevrons this mode is not worth touching.


so u want a ranked mode where u cant lose chevrons so it just becomes a grind and not a skill based mode?



feies_vlad #55 Posted 08 September 2019 - 12:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12892 battles
  • 241
  • [CIRC] CIRC
  • Member since:
    09-05-2015

View PostZapfhan, on 07 September 2019 - 12:47 PM, said:

If you already own the Rudy before the feature is released to the live server you will receive a polish crew with Brothers in arms. 

Will the polish crew have 0 skill bia as the Rudy crew has or just as a normal skill? Thank you :)



Autobot8Ironhide #56 Posted 08 September 2019 - 01:40 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12372 battles
  • 21
  • Member since:
    05-03-2015
Yet another patch that shows how disconnected wargaming is from the community, and how much marketing lies the 2019 changes video was in December 2018.

XavyerGT #57 Posted 08 September 2019 - 03:44 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12294 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    09-27-2014

I am against of this type of changes like this :

Change the nationality of the tanks is against the hystorical batles  .

WG must take my advice in consideration let those tanks in their brancheswere must be even is just a game at least keep  history line.



UNFAIR_GAME_8 #58 Posted 08 September 2019 - 03:48 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6863 battles
  • 26
  • [_U_G_] _U_G_
  • Member since:
    02-05-2019
no tanks for bonds in this update ? so no thing is new in the update

LK_4D4 #59 Posted 08 September 2019 - 09:35 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 46851 battles
  • 204
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    01-07-2012

for a start - lets not only criticise i have to applaud  for: fixed mm, friendly fire (iam not sure if that is good), sixth sence is now available more for everybody trough training books (not what you proposed but that will do), blacklisted maps...

 

but here is the thing:

 

still waiting for "hide statistics/private stats option"  from this top secret video https://www.youtube....h?v=25LRPraccEI

majority of the comunity voted for that at 14:10 in DezGamez survey here : https://www.youtube....h?v=__BRRwGvcc8

 

than where is the changes to super heavy tanks like IS4, E100 which you promised almost year ago - people do not even touch them because of  "great" stun mechanics, higher fire rate artas + big splash radius and 3 of them per every game... and than again when arta came in to the topic, why you never tried allocate one server which will be completely arta free... (i would not even mind if that will be one of the two EU servers, not like you need to add 3rd)

 

game was shining the most in august-december 2016 and one of the reason was more accurate guns/less rng which also means less frustration and opportunity to stay esports isnt it?  in that time there was also not so much pay2win aspects  which is the reason why your esport branch lived. Maybe your company politics did not consider yet that more people playing game = more money for you...

 

Maps was without bushy camping spots (as great example Kharkov rework) which means more action and therefore more fun. 

 

ranked battles? have you considered to focus on eqal chances for everybody? obj279(e) etc. does ring a bell? :D

 

T10 is now full of op reward tanks bullying tech tree tanks and you bringing up features that nobody asked for... 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Edited by LK_4D4, 08 September 2019 - 09:56 PM.


iKnewIT #60 Posted 09 September 2019 - 08:20 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 78760 battles
  • 1,025
  • Member since:
    10-07-2012

View Postsammygo, on 06 September 2019 - 11:45 PM, said:

Useless. WG could better invest its precious time in fixing the MM (if they would really care, I doubt it).

 

What don't You like about MM nowadays, after the last changes of the templates?

 

--------------------------------------------------------------

 

And for all the whiners...

It's the patch 1.6.1, for God sake.....

 

p. s. You should try to write down the amount of SPG's per Your battles. I think most of SPG's haters will be surprised. ;)

p. p. s. Who forbids You to do missions for 260 and/or 279e? Really....


Edited by iKnewIT, 09 September 2019 - 08:33 AM.






5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users