Jump to content


Dont put light on top of the tree ever again.


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

Ey_Devastor #1 Posted 12 September 2019 - 05:09 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15854 battles
  • 31
  • [SKIL1] SKIL1
  • Member since:
    01-31-2017

The title says it all, there is plenty of mediums, heavies or TDs to put ot TOTT. The thing is teams sometimes heavily rely on scouts and nowdays when you see there are 2 sheridans in your team you can already start diging your grave. One of them will rush and die and the second one will camp redline, this thing is happening pretty often and it will happen for next 19 days or so. I just want to aks you, please dont put on TOTT tanks that have pretty big impact on the game.

 

I understand that even without TOTT there will be players like that and ofc they have all the rights to get hands on the vehicles but there will be far less of them which means less suffering for the players who wants to enjoy the game.

 

So what do you thing ? Should there be another light on TOTT in the future or should WG stick to mediums, heavies and TDs ? Let me know :)



undutchable80 #2 Posted 12 September 2019 - 05:15 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 11642 battles
  • 3,830
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

I disagree. Lights should be included in the TotT in the future. 

 

Every month you see more tanks of the TotT line than usual. Some are good tanks, some are bad tanks. Some are driven by good players, and some are driven by bad players. Sounds blunt, but just deal with it. 



NUKLEAR_SLUG #3 Posted 12 September 2019 - 05:18 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 34085 battles
  • 4,415
  • [FISHY] FISHY
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
You should be happy there are more lights, it means less chance of all of them being potatoes and dying in the first few seconds leaving you no scouts at all.

FrantisekBascovansky #4 Posted 12 September 2019 - 05:22 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29675 battles
  • 753
  • Member since:
    03-26-2018
Let's put arty on top of the tree.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #5 Posted 12 September 2019 - 05:28 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 53231 battles
  • 5,320
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

A battle with more lights (or arty) is usually easier to swing either way in my opinion. At least in a month time more people will get used to this class's game play and hopefully become better scouts.



8126Jakobsson #6 Posted 12 September 2019 - 05:29 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 78842 battles
  • 5,242
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Well I don't like when TD's are in the top of the tree as you'll have at least half of your team being passive in the back. :P

Bigtime_Alarm #7 Posted 12 September 2019 - 05:34 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21518 battles
  • 534
  • Member since:
    05-14-2013
What about Christmas? 

Balc0ra #8 Posted 12 September 2019 - 06:12 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 72848 battles
  • 20,704
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Sure.... if we never get clip meds or super heavies too. Or the 430U.

Bordhaw #9 Posted 13 September 2019 - 10:45 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 14894 battles
  • 4,882
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostEy_Devastor, on 12 September 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

The title says it all, there is plenty of mediums, heavies or TDs to put ot TOTT. The thing is teams sometimes heavily rely on scouts and nowdays when you see there are 2 sheridans in your team you can already start diging your grave. One of them will rush and die and the second one will camp redline, this thing is happening pretty often and it will happen for next 19 days or so. I just want to aks you, please dont put on TOTT tanks that have pretty big impact on the game.

 

I understand that even without TOTT there will be players like that and ofc they have all the rights to get hands on the vehicles but there will be far less of them which means less suffering for the players who wants to enjoy the game.

 

So what do you thing ? Should there be another light on TOTT in the future or should WG stick to mediums, heavies and TDs ? Let me know :)

 



Lagalaza #10 Posted 13 September 2019 - 11:07 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9261 battles
  • 507
  • [W0WW] W0WW
  • Member since:
    08-11-2018
I don't see a problem really. There are good and bad players and tanks in every class. ToTT is surely there to encourage players to go down a line they maybe wouldn't normally. To help to expand their knowledge and abilities. A good thing in my book. It took me down the Russian TD line to the amazingly fun ISU-152. :bush:A tank I would probably have never gone to for years because I really wanted the SU-101. Now, one day soon, I'll have both :)

WindSplitter1 #11 Posted 13 September 2019 - 11:04 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18918 battles
  • 3,404
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostEy_Devastor, on 12 September 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

The title says it all, there is plenty of mediums, heavies or TDs to put ot TOTT. The thing is teams sometimes heavily rely on scouts and nowdays when you see there are 2 sheridans in your team you can already start diging your grave. One of them will rush and die and the second one will camp redline, this thing is happening pretty often and it will happen for next 19 days or so. I just want to aks you, please dont put on TOTT tanks that have pretty big impact on the game.

 

I understand that even without TOTT there will be players like that and ofc they have all the rights to get hands on the vehicles but there will be far less of them which means less suffering for the players who wants to enjoy the game.

 

So what do you thing ? Should there be another light on TOTT in the future or should WG stick to mediums, heavies and TDs ? Let me know :)

 

Oh, yes.

 

We should definitely pamper the HT master race further and have more armour to challenge on, that is poorly used and expected to be undefeated to have people complaining about how useless they claim it is rather than using the enviromental buffs and like advantages not needed for such a class, with a predictable repetitive game style...

 

...Or flood the matchmaker with even more tank-destroyers, excessively punishing players that are actually playing the game while rewarding players who almost are not.

 



mjs_89 #12 Posted 14 September 2019 - 06:45 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8520 battles
  • 858
  • [95137] 95137
  • Member since:
    08-16-2017
I hope you're still around when the wheelies are ToTT... What a glorious month that'll be.

Unicorn_of_Steel #13 Posted 14 September 2019 - 07:13 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14615 battles
  • 405
  • [R_D_A] R_D_A
  • Member since:
    12-29-2017

View Postmjs_89, on 14 September 2019 - 06:45 AM, said:

I hope you're still around when the wheelies are ToTT... What a glorious month that'll be.

 

I already have plans for that month and that ain't including anything remotely related to playing WoT ...



CrazyLovex #14 Posted 14 September 2019 - 07:47 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21714 battles
  • 364
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013

Agree with OP

But the problem with an LT being ToTT, is that were getting 5 LTs in a battle, I've seen this A LOT.. 

Couple T49s a Sheridan plus the 2 other LTs.. 

 

This does mess up the balance of the battle.. 

 

It's like having 5 SPGs (and yh they stopped that) 

 

HTs Mt's and TDs you can have 5-6 of those in a battle and the balance of the match does not get as weird as 5-6 LTs or SPGs.. 

 

So I think LTs should be limited at least if WG are gonna make an LT ToTT put a 3 cap per battle limit for the month, to maintain some kinda in-battle balance. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users