Jump to content


T26E5 - this vehicle is pure garbage


  • Please log in to reply
69 replies to this topic

ValkyrionX #1 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:28 PM

    Major

  • Moderator
  • 54604 battles
  • 2,716
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015
change my mind 

Xandania #2 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:33 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44057 battles
  • 1,783
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

 

Cool!



gitgud_cannot #3 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29881 battles
  • 1,396
  • Member since:
    10-31-2013
nah, its still good even in current meta.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #4 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:36 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 53231 battles
  • 5,631
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

It isn't "pure garbage" but it isn't a very good tank either. Not the tank's fault if the competition is much harder among tier 8 premium heavies.



JocMeister #5 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:37 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 28066 battles
  • 2,663
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

Decided to 3-mark it last week. Gun drove me absolutely insane so I gave up after just a few battles.

 

I dont think its rubbish but its extremely frustrating and unfun to play.

 



8126Jakobsson #6 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:40 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 80858 battles
  • 5,620
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Well I think it's fine. Nice turret. Good gun depression. Credits pew-pew. 

Stevies_Team #7 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:41 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14801 battles
  • 1,618
  • Member since:
    07-14-2016
Needs a mobility buuf

LordMuffin #8 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:43 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 53499 battles
  • 13,409
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011
Still a decent T8 premium.
Not as retard proof as Defender or IS-3A for example, which might be why you struggle.

ValkyrionX #9 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:46 PM

    Major

  • Moderator
  • 54604 battles
  • 2,716
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

View PostMajor_Gitgud, on 29 September 2019 - 02:34 PM, said:

nah, its still good even in current meta.

 

I do not think so, it is a vehicle absolutely out of any kind of competitiveness concept, compared to caernarvon and the premium caernarvon AX, vehicles with similar alpha damage and with similar general characteristics , this tank has an obscenely low DPM , and ofc the rate of fire/ reload time , that makes a vehicle that is absolutely fearless to anyone and compared to the T32, with which it shares a very similar turret design, the cupola on the turret is very weak compared to that of the same T32

Absolutely ridiculous vehicle , without counting an excessive dispersion compared to the English counterparts.

 

View PostXandania, on 29 September 2019 - 02:33 PM, said:

 

Cool!

 

I wanted to be provocative, as far as I can see I succeeded :)

13:47 Added after 1 minute

View PostLordMuffin, on 29 September 2019 - 02:43 PM, said:

Still a decent T8 premium.
Not as retard proof as Defender or IS-3A for example, which might be why you struggle.

 

we are talking about hull down tanks, it has nothing to do with pulling out other types of tanks

13:50 Added after 3 minute

View PostJocMeister, on 29 September 2019 - 02:37 PM, said:

Decided to 3-mark it last week. Gun drove me absolutely insane so I gave up after just a few battles.

 

I dont think its rubbish but its extremely frustrating and unfun to play.

 

 

in fact, my thesis is well supported by the very low requests to make 3 moe, barely 2200 combined for the third mark, this long ladder on how ridiculous this vehicle is.
 
obviously the poor t34 should not be forgotten , also totally ignored by the great geniuses of the WG


LordMuffin #10 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 53499 battles
  • 13,409
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    06-21-2011

View PostValkyrionX, on 29 September 2019 - 02:46 PM, said:

 

I do not think so, it is a vehicle absolutely out of any kind of competitiveness concept, compared to caernarvon and the premium caernarvon AX, vehicles with similar alpha damage and with similar general characteristics , this tank has an obscenely low DPM , and ofc the rate of fire/ reload time , that makes a vehicle that is absolutely fearless to anyone and compared to the T32, with which it shares a very similar turret design, the cupola on the turret is very weak compared to that of the same T32

Absolutely ridiculous vehicle , without counting an excessive dispersion compared to the English counterparts.

 

 

I wanted to be provocative, as far as I can see I succeeded :)

13:47 Added after 1 minute

 

we are talking about hull down tanks, it has nothing to do with pulling out other types of tanks

13:50 Added after 3 minute

 

in fact, my thesis is well supported by the very low requests to make 3 moe, barely 2200 combined for the third mark, this long ladder on how ridiculous this vehicle is.
 
obviously the poor t34 should not be forgotten , also totally ignored by the great geniuses of the WG

You are talking about "T24E5 sucks; change my mind".

The context is that you think the tank sucks. No other context have been shown.

 

Maybe you should try to create a worthwhile OP if you actually want to discuss the tank.


Edited by LordMuffin, 29 September 2019 - 02:55 PM.


ValkyrionX #11 Posted 29 September 2019 - 02:58 PM

    Major

  • Moderator
  • 54604 battles
  • 2,716
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

View PostLordMuffin, on 29 September 2019 - 02:54 PM, said:

You are talking about "T24E5 sucks; change my mind".

The context is that you think the tank sucks. No other context have been shown.

 

Maybe you should try to create a worthwhile OP if you actually want to discuss the tank.

 

there is a beautiful feature in the game that lets you compare the tanks, try to do it , because before I opened this thread, I did it.

 

re-read the first point where the alpha damage, the dispersion, the recharge and the rate of fire and the dpm are mentioned .. maybe you didn't notice (?)

 

 



ziratulbihac #12 Posted 29 September 2019 - 03:11 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 4263 battles
  • 144
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013
in the age of speed and apcr, patriot feels like it's out of meta. 

Dava_117 #13 Posted 29 September 2019 - 03:40 PM

    Major General

  • Moderator
  • 23008 battles
  • 5,468
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

Well, compared to other hulldown tanks is not that bad...

It has better pen than T32

It has better mobility and DPM compared to T34

It has better armour (both on turret and hull) compared to CaernAX

 

Of course my KV-4 APCR can troll its turret armour, but very few tier 8 tank have chance to pen it there. ;)


Edited by Dava_117, 29 September 2019 - 03:40 PM.


Gkirmathal #14 Posted 29 September 2019 - 03:42 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 8602 battles
  • 1,739
  • [2VTD] 2VTD
  • Member since:
    01-14-2013
LOL I remember well when it was released. Arguably it was one of the best premium tier 8 heavies back then, swamping tier 8 SH's together with the M4 49. Before it one could see the T32 or the Pershing being used in the sea of IS-3's...but after the E5 got sold...those days were over...so yeah.

ziratulbihac #15 Posted 29 September 2019 - 03:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 4263 battles
  • 144
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

View PostGkirmathal, on 29 September 2019 - 02:42 PM, said:

LOL I remember well when it was released. Arguably it was one of the best premium tier 8 heavies back then, swamping tier 8 SH's together with the M4 49. Before it one could see the T32 or the Pershing being used in the sea of IS-3's...but after the E5 got sold...those days were over...so yeah.

 

They give OP tank, then make it worthless and so on... 

 

Game evolves towards WG pockets. 



ValkyrionX #16 Posted 29 September 2019 - 04:22 PM

    Major

  • Moderator
  • 54604 battles
  • 2,716
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    02-07-2015

View PostDava_117, on 29 September 2019 - 03:40 PM, said:

Well, compared to other hulldown tanks is not that bad...

It has better pen than T32

It has better mobility and DPM compared to T34

It has better armour (both on turret and hull) compared to CaernAX

 

Of course my KV-4 APCR can troll its turret armour, but very few tier 8 tank have chance to pen it there. ;)

 

the comparison with t32 and t34 is quite relative as it is much more similar to the English tanks

compared to those it really sucks, I seem to play a tier 7 not a tier 8

 

the t32 despite lower mobility and lower penetration is far better as a hulldown tank



Xandania #17 Posted 29 September 2019 - 04:56 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44057 battles
  • 1,783
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
And not that long ago this tank was widely dencounced as OP.....

Karasu_Hidesuke #18 Posted 29 September 2019 - 04:59 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 17143 battles
  • 4,678
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
It's a medium tank with cheap ammo.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #19 Posted 29 September 2019 - 05:00 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 53231 battles
  • 5,631
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostKarasu_Hidesuke, on 29 September 2019 - 07:59 PM, said:

It's a medium tank with cheap ammo.

 

Super Pershing? ;)



Karasu_Hidesuke #20 Posted 29 September 2019 - 05:06 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 17143 battles
  • 4,678
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 29 September 2019 - 04:00 PM, said:

 

Super Pershing? ;)

 

Uhm... can't remember the ammo costs, I had the SP at one point but unlike all the others mine had defective armor...






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users