Jump to content


Just saying


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

ntava #1 Posted 02 October 2019 - 07:57 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20924 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013
Not much more to say

Attached Files

  • Attached File   just saying.png   2.15MB


PowJay #2 Posted 02 October 2019 - 08:00 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 40500 battles
  • 5,620
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

We will... we are waiting?

 

Who the heck puts an apostrophe in the middle of WELL?

 

Just saying.



Balc0ra #3 Posted 02 October 2019 - 08:01 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 74388 battles
  • 21,280
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
If they removed the E5 cupola, people might forget the RU tanks again.

gunslingerXXX #4 Posted 02 October 2019 - 08:05 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 13147 battles
  • 3,507
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

I would approve. The cupola of my E5 usually looks like swiss cheese 2 minutes after encountering an enemy. Its just to easy to hit even when you keep moving

 



Bulldog_Drummond #5 Posted 02 October 2019 - 08:06 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33576 battles
  • 10,751
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014
Whatever.

Dorander #6 Posted 02 October 2019 - 08:57 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21025 battles
  • 6,042
  • Member since:
    05-07-2012

View PostPowJay, on 02 October 2019 - 07:00 PM, said:

 

Who the heck puts an apostrophe in the middle of WELL?

 

 

I believe it's supposed to resemble the bucket.



TheKing99 #7 Posted 02 October 2019 - 11:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1375 battles
  • 42
  • [LGBTQ] LGBTQ
  • Member since:
    11-02-2011
I'm not sure if the comparison makes much sense, but I reckon that effort, whether measured 'in-game' or in 'real life', will be rewarded. ;)

Miepie #8 Posted 03 October 2019 - 06:41 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4753 battles
  • 1,408
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018

View PostPowJay, on 02 October 2019 - 08:00 PM, said:

We will... we are waiting?

 

Who the heck puts an apostrophe in the middle of WELL?

 

Just saying.

The Bishop of Ba'ath and We'lls! :ohmy:



Cobra6 #9 Posted 03 October 2019 - 08:49 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16531 battles
  • 17,655
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

The T110E5 had an invulnerable cupola and it was broken, so no.

 

That being said, if you'd put the Chieftain/T95 (T8 CW reward vehicle) in there, you'd have a point.

 

Cobra 6



tajj7 #10 Posted 03 October 2019 - 09:03 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 28447 battles
  • 16,705
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostCobra6, on 03 October 2019 - 07:49 AM, said:

The T110E5 had an invulnerable cupola and it was broken, so no.

 

That being said, if you'd put the Chieftain/T95 (T8 CW reward vehicle) in there, you'd have a point.

 

Cobra 6

 

It wasn't invulnerable, its was easy pen with premium ammo which is what most people did, and it still had an easy pen lower plate weakspot, we have whole tanks now that have no weakspot at all or a very tiny one. I mean Type 5, 279e, 430U, T95/FV4201, all those tanks either need premium ammo to pen them in the open or are basically immune hull down.

 

T95/FV4201 would be way weaker if it had the old E5's cupola, you'd be able to pen it hull down with premium ammo which would make it way easier to deal with hull down than it is now, and it's still faster than the E5, with more alpha, more DPM, more pen, more gun depression and better gun handling.

 

Old E5 in the current meta wouldn't even be a good tank IMO, it would be average and it was never as good as the fuss and hype about it, which is shown by its pitiful state now.

 

It needs the same treatment as the M48 had, make the cupola way smaller and probably needs other buffs as well as its one of the weaker tanks on tier 10.

 

---------------------------------------------

 

Also @ OP, the T95E2 still has the terrible cupola, typical WG they present the TL-1 LPC as if it's a replacement for the terrible T95E2 and then go and just sell it as a new tank that is completely better than the T95E2, because we can't have the few thousand T95E2 owners getting an actual decent tank now can we, nah we have to try and milk them.

 

All those silly US cupola style tanks need the same treatment IMO.  T110E5, T110E4, Chieftain/T95, T95E6, M60, T95E2, and the 59-Patton should all get much smaller style cupola's like the M48 Patton got, it's also basically historical because the US made cupola's like that so in theory pretty much any tank could have had the smaller style cupola fitted.

 

 

 

 

 

 



ntava #11 Posted 03 October 2019 - 12:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20924 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

View PostPowJay, on 02 October 2019 - 08:00 PM, said:

We will... we are waiting?

 

Who the heck puts an apostrophe in the middle of WELL?

 

Just saying.

As you can clearly see these are random internet pictures. It took me 5 minutes to make a picture to show my point and didnt see the " we'll ".  Even if i did see it i wouldnt really care anyway. Just saying 

11:55 Added after 7 minute

View PostCobra6, on 03 October 2019 - 08:49 AM, said:

The T110E5 had an invulnerable cupola and it was broken, so no.

 

That being said, if you'd put the Chieftain/T95 (T8 CW reward vehicle) in there, you'd have a point.

 

Cobra 6

Invunerable cupola ? 

Let me laugh . The weakspot of the cupola was the lower ring and not the whole thing, something that most people didnt realise.

Not to mention that almost any t10 heat shell could easily pen the whole cupola which is MASSIVE for a t10 tank

 

But yea sure lets have 1pixel tank cupolas (chieftains)

or 250mm cupolas (type5)  and not give the e5 a chance to be a t10 tank because "IT waS Op BacK ThEN"

11:59 Added after 12 minute

View Posttajj7, on 03 October 2019 - 09:03 AM, said:

Also @ OP, the T95E2 still has the terrible cupola, typical WG they present the TL-1 LPC as if it's a replacement for the terrible T95E2 and then go and just sell it as a new tank that is completely better than the T95E2, because we can't have the few thousand T95E2 owners getting an actual decent tank now can we, nah we have to try and milk them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yea i know they are supposed to be "different" tanks but lets be honest here. they are the same tank with different stats because as you say "screw these guys that have the e2. pay up "  



FatigueGalaxy #12 Posted 03 October 2019 - 01:11 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22255 battles
  • 2,362
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-09-2011

View PostCobra6, on 03 October 2019 - 08:49 AM, said:

The T110E5 had an invulnerable cupola and it was broken, so no.

 

That being said, if you'd put the Chieftain/T95 (T8 CW reward vehicle) in there, you'd have a point.

 

Cobra 6


E5 would be a mediocre tank, even with no cupola at all.



TheNightFox #13 Posted 03 October 2019 - 01:27 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9783 battles
  • 288
  • [REV0L] REV0L
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

View PostCobra6, on 03 October 2019 - 08:49 AM, said:

The T110E5 had an invulnerable cupola and it was broken, so no.

 

That being said, if you'd put the Chieftain/T95 (T8 CW reward vehicle) in there, you'd have a point.

 

Cobra 6


Yep, you'd have a point if you ask for a vehicle  of MY choice to be buffed. Because what I wish for is so important, and the game NEEDS to cater to my precious needs. Cobra, you're so full of it.


Edited by TheNightFox, 03 October 2019 - 01:27 PM.


TankkiPoju #14 Posted 04 October 2019 - 06:35 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 23978 battles
  • 7,427
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostCobra6, on 03 October 2019 - 08:49 AM, said:

The T110E5 had an invulnerable cupola and it was broken, so no.

 

It was very strong, but pretty damn far from invulnerable though. What you probably mean was the cupola wasn't autopen to even 330mm HEAT because of it's round shape.

 

But maybe heavy tank armor is "broken" if premium ammo can't autopen it /s.

 

Personally I feel a game design where heavy tanks have huge "PLS HIT ME HERE" cupola is just stupid.

 

EDIT: And even with the old cupola, E5 would be pretty average in 2019 with all the power creep.


Edited by TankkiPoju, 04 October 2019 - 06:37 AM.


ntava #15 Posted 06 October 2019 - 02:28 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20924 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    08-04-2013

EDIT: And even with the old cupola, E5 would be pretty average in 2019 with all the power creep.

 

 Not even average imo

It doesnt have alpha or dpm or mobility or a really good gun. Close to being average but not quite making it

The only thing i feel is special with the e5 is the lower plate. That boat shape lower plate takes players by a suprice if they dont aim at the sides of it. Like the other american tanks (e3-e4-t57)

 

Well it would be nice if you could go hulldown but if enemy has a chief or s.conq or a kranvagn you cant really win (assuming both players are decent)

 

 


Edited by ntava, 06 October 2019 - 02:29 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users