Jump to content


Break all the Walls with the M48 RPz


  • Please log in to reply
97 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:00 AM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 31,506
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Yes, this tank räums Panzers.

The full text of the news item

Opct #2 Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:32 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 33634 battles
  • 154
  • [LOSER] LOSER
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011
Yay! One more time - "F*** y** T95E2 owners"!

Vtsuk #3 Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:32 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12832 battles
  • 125
  • [W0WW] W0WW
  • Member since:
    12-28-2016

Tier 8 cheaper than 40€?!

I'm pretty sure without even looking at stats, that it's going to be useless.

And I'm gona say it one more time:

After the introduction of crew books, premium tanks as crew trainers are completely useless, if you want to train your crews

Of any nation you buy a broken- OP premium tank and just buy 

crew books with the credits you make.

Plus you can use it in tier 8 clan wars and skirms since now only

Those kind of tanks are competitive, as T8 clan wars and skirms 

Have turned full P2W!


Edited by Vtsuk, 30 October 2019 - 06:35 AM.


Glow_Jack #4 Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:39 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1379 battles
  • 11
  • Member since:
    06-04-2015
T95E2 still good tank but big minus is not gaining credits.
This one IS like superpershing BUT no pref MM will make strugle this is why is priced low for 7500 gold tank

Weak_man #5 Posted 30 October 2019 - 06:55 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7727 battles
  • 1,021
  • [AMURG] AMURG
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017
This tanks is for winter map to clean the roads

StronkiTonki #6 Posted 30 October 2019 - 07:18 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 34490 battles
  • 995
  • [T0AST] T0AST
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

View PostOpct, on 30 October 2019 - 05:32 AM, said:

Yay! One more time - "F*** y** T95E2 owners"!

It's actually an M48 Patton on tier 8



shikaka9 #7 Posted 30 October 2019 - 07:37 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 71191 battles
  • 1,081
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
I bet it will look fascinating in christmas camo :trollface:

Range_Ace #8 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:11 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 12890 battles
  • 52
  • [FUS2D] FUS2D
  • Member since:
    02-20-2016
It looks too weird for my taste. :D

Xaltu #9 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:12 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 21934 battles
  • 184
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-17-2016

I took a look and thought £42.75 was a good deal for the Supreme package, until I realised that it was linking to the Ultimate package instead.

 

Now is the blade cosmetic or can you deploy is like a proper dozer blade?



undutchable80 #10 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:27 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 12164 battles
  • 3,960
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

View PostXaltu, on 30 October 2019 - 08:12 AM, said:

I took a look and thought £42.75 was a good deal for the Supreme package, until I realised that it was linking to the Ultimate package instead.

 

Now is the blade cosmetic or can you deploy is like a proper dozer blade?

Cosmetic, even though it does act as spaced armour



Smegger213 #11 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:29 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 14765 battles
  • 435
  • [-4DC-] -4DC-
  • Member since:
    08-16-2012

Yet another tier 8 premium.

 

Smacks of desperation by Wargaming, wanting the quick cash grab.



Cobra6 #12 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:34 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16530 battles
  • 17,557
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

T95E2 and Chieftain/T95 are still there and *STILL* not properly balanced (underpowered). But by all means keep releasing new ever better premium tanks every week/month further eroding your public image bit by bit.

 

Because that is what happens when you ignore problems on purpose with the excuse of a "global rebalance" while still releasing new (better) premium tanks. If you can do *THAT*, you can also change the existing ones at the same time as it's evident you already know the new parameters against which you are balancing.

 

Cobra 6



Samaliot33 #13 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:37 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30318 battles
  • 69
  • Member since:
    04-19-2015
Not bying from them anything for about a year. Im ok with that hope they do so. Better buy something  instead of pixels. Do u realise 30_50 euros for a tank, what tank... ? . Better buy new game from steam and u for sure have fun. Or buy dirtbike like me. Its 100 % fun. Not talking about fun in this... Let it be game... Guys u not changing they not changing... By the way this... Let it be game.. Is ******. 

X_O_X_O_JI #14 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:37 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6948 battles
  • 6
  • [9UKR] 9UKR
  • Member since:
    12-20-2016
April . 1st ???? : Facepalm:

Nyxta #15 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:39 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 45200 battles
  • 61
  • [G-DOM] G-DOM
  • Member since:
    03-19-2011
Does it get extra ram damage? It should..

Krazy_Kalle #16 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:42 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 17084 battles
  • 83
  • [VIECH] VIECH
  • Member since:
    11-01-2016

Next prem for sell...

It's gotten old by now. I've gathered so many premiums, I don't even have to time to play them all.

WG please, I know you need money, like for real, to pay your employees and all that stuff.

But could you please consider, instead of just releasing one premium tank after another, to just sell older ones and bring new free to play content into the game?

It is simply way too much. We already have sooo many premium tanks.

As for his special looks, this candidate would've perfect for some kind of reward, like a third campaign or something.



8126Jakobsson #17 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:52 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 79642 battles
  • 5,387
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
This and E75 TS should have been in the bond shop instead of the two CW tanks. 

FrantisekBascovansky #18 Posted 30 October 2019 - 08:53 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31262 battles
  • 788
  • Member since:
    03-26-2018

World of premium tanks

 

Also, TKS 20 on top of the turret? Can we add "Shoot me!" inscription over it?


Edited by FrantisekBascovansky, 30 October 2019 - 09:06 AM.


gunslingerXXX #19 Posted 30 October 2019 - 09:04 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 12930 battles
  • 3,411
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

View PostCobra6, on 30 October 2019 - 08:34 AM, said:

 it's evident you already know the new parameters against which you are balancing.

 

The whole rebalance stuff is a scam. Changing everything just to decrease gold spam is dumb and they know it. 

My prediction is that the rebalance stuff will just fade away and die together with the rest of the game around 2025. 

 

Just enjoy the game as much fun as possible till that time.



pihip #20 Posted 30 October 2019 - 09:14 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16023 battles
  • 1,253
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View PostCobra6, on 30 October 2019 - 08:34 AM, said:

T95E2 and Chieftain/T95 are still there and *STILL* not properly balanced (underpowered). But by all means keep releasing new ever better premium tanks every week/month further eroding your public image bit by bit.

 

Because that is what happens when you ignore problems on purpose with the excuse of a "global rebalance" while still releasing new (better) premium tanks. If you can do *THAT*, you can also change the existing ones at the same time as it's evident you already know the new parameters against which you are balancing.

 

Cobra 6


https://tanks.gg/com...?t=chieftaint95

Does not seem that "better", especially compared to a tank you purples complain is weak and needs buffs.

 

It's still got Tier 10 Patton armor at Tier 8 which can be a big thing (afaik the Patton is very well-armored), otherwise it seems like a rather balanced tank... maybe that's the problem? :harp:






4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users