Jump to content


Unbalanced ranked battles


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

The_Leviatan #1 Posted 01 November 2019 - 07:18 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4279 battles
  • 10
  • [BEPIS] BEPIS
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016
I decided to try out ranked battles for the first time and I feel they are even more unbalanced than random battles. I would consider myself to be pretty average player and still I won 0/10 games i played so far (0 means 0, i haven't won single game even when i dealt more than my hp in atleast half of these games). This seems that teams are even more unbalanced here than on random battles. Is it possible for WG to be as bad at everything as they are or are they just trying so hard to do things as bad as they can? 

Bordhaw #2 Posted 01 November 2019 - 07:37 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 15581 battles
  • 5,322
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostThe_Leviatan, on 01 November 2019 - 06:18 PM, said:

I would consider myself to be pretty average player and still I won 0/10 games i played so far 

 



QPoszto #3 Posted 02 November 2019 - 12:00 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 9308 battles
  • 116
  • [QPTM] QPTM
  • Member since:
    03-06-2016
Of course, ranked is a piece of sht even in higher ranks. Im average or below, almost reaxher 15 alrdy in the 3. Session with 1 almost 2 hrs gane per day. But simply can play more. Its frustrating to see a rabk 13 match ends within 4 mins. And the bugs that shoots disappear somewhere. Etc. Rigged fucked game. 

wEight_Tanker #4 Posted 02 November 2019 - 02:56 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11791 battles
  • 1,382
  • [D_L_Z] D_L_Z
  • Member since:
    11-13-2016
This is just a troll attracting semi-troll thread. Ranked is definitely not for everyone. While being significantly better than Tier X randoms, I would consider getting more and better Tier X tanks. Can't get past Rank 5 in Division 3. IS-7 is sure bouncy as hell, but I can't say much until I get more X.

Spurtung #5 Posted 02 November 2019 - 03:22 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 76271 battles
  • 7,211
  • [WG_PT] WG_PT
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013
Well, as long as it's you considering yourself to be average, I suppose you're technically correct.

AIZEN_GUARD #6 Posted 02 November 2019 - 08:36 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 24399 battles
  • 131
  • [GRFIN] GRFIN
  • Member since:
    02-25-2013

EBR vs RHM

T110E5 vs 2x 279

is supper broken MM



Stevies_Team #7 Posted 02 November 2019 - 09:22 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15765 battles
  • 1,821
  • Member since:
    07-14-2016

Is it possible for WG to be as bad at everything as they are or are they just trying so hard to do things as bad as they can?

 

This is post of the week

It's like with the government guys

 

WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT??

 

There are various theories

 

1 It's possible we have been invaded by aliens and they are taking the pi**

2 The world is run by the insane pretending to be normal

3 They do it because they are stupid

4 The greater your academic achievements the less common bluddy sense you have

 

Feel free to expand upon what is a truly topical subject which touches upon every aspect of our lives and could fill entire books



Dramakid19 #8 Posted 02 November 2019 - 12:50 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20374 battles
  • 110
  • [V1PER] V1PER
  • Member since:
    11-10-2016
Half of the games end up pretty fast, but had also plenty of battles until the same end of 15 min round! There is to much camping for my taste, to much lemming trains that fail and leave one flank open to enemy counter attacks. I just grab those double chevrons and that's it.

Badkarma1313 #9 Posted 02 November 2019 - 12:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4013 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    09-01-2018

View PostThe_Leviatan, on 01 November 2019 - 07:18 PM, said:

I decided to try out ranked battles for the first time and I feel they are even more unbalanced than random battles. I would consider myself to be pretty average player and still I won 0/10 games i played so far (0 means 0, i haven't won single game even when i dealt more than my hp in atleast half of these games). This seems that teams are even more unbalanced here than on random battles. Is it possible for WG to be as bad at everything as they are or are they just trying so hard to do things as bad as they can? 

Who told you that anything (ranked, front line, randoms) were guaranteed to be balanced? Buck up snowflake.



The_Leviatan #10 Posted 02 November 2019 - 01:24 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4279 battles
  • 10
  • [BEPIS] BEPIS
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016

View PostBadkarma1313, on 02 November 2019 - 12:53 PM, said:

Who told you that anything (ranked, front line, randoms) were guaranteed to be balanced? Buck up snowflake.

What is purpose of ranks other than letting similarly skilled players to play against each other?



Spurtung #11 Posted 02 November 2019 - 02:02 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 76271 battles
  • 7,211
  • [WG_PT] WG_PT
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostThe_Leviatan, on 02 November 2019 - 12:24 PM, said:

What is purpose of ranks other than letting similarly skilled players to play against each other?

 

You do understand that bottom feeders like you won't make the cut, right?

 

Because you can win 0 out of those 10, but you can also earn 10 chevrons in those very same 10 games. Wanna take a guess why you don't...?



The_Leviatan #12 Posted 02 November 2019 - 04:29 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4279 battles
  • 10
  • [BEPIS] BEPIS
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016

View PostSpurtung, on 02 November 2019 - 02:02 PM, said:

 

You do understand that bottom feeders like you won't make the cut, right?

 

Because you can win 0 out of those 10, but you can also earn 10 chevrons in those very same 10 games. Wanna take a guess why you don't...?

Another one that doesn't understand general purpose of having ranks in the game? I am not talking about getting rewards, I am talking about losing all the games you play while having ranks in the game. 



Spurtung #13 Posted 02 November 2019 - 04:34 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 76271 battles
  • 7,211
  • [WG_PT] WG_PT
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostThe_Leviatan, on 02 November 2019 - 03:29 PM, said:

Another one that doesn't understand general purpose of having ranks in the game? I am not talking about getting rewards, I am talking about losing all the games you play while having ranks in the game. 

 

If you can win chevrons even while losing games, explain what I'm missing here.



The_Leviatan #14 Posted 02 November 2019 - 05:05 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 4279 battles
  • 10
  • [BEPIS] BEPIS
  • Member since:
    10-01-2016
That general purpose of ranks is not just to rank players but also to make equally skilled players play each other. If I am supposed to play equally skilled players how it's possible I haven't won single in 10 games.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users