Jump to content


Blacklisted players

bad players spammers bots eula rigged matchmaking blacklist blacklisted players rng

  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

Maick3l #21 Posted 17 November 2019 - 12:30 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11357 battles
  • 29
  • Member since:
    12-26-2014

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 16 November 2019 - 11:38 PM, said:

 

There's no elephant. If you're trying to blame WG rigging your games for your 42% WR because your a Edited in chat then the solution is simple, keep your mouth shut. There will be two possible outcomes. Either your WR will go up, which will prove WG rigged your games or it'll make no difference to your WR because there is no rigging and you just suck. 


I've already established that it's a 40% win rate not 42 and that it's impossible for me to suck since wn8 doesn't confirm it. Either way it's impossible to have such a low win rate even if I afk all my matches. You're the one who sucks, pal


Edited by Asklepi0s, 17 November 2019 - 10:34 AM.


Balc0ra #22 Posted 17 November 2019 - 12:32 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 74269 battles
  • 21,219
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostGodTank2, on 16 November 2019 - 09:06 PM, said:

How can the matchmaker be designed for more losses than victories when in every game 1 team is the winner and 1 is the loser?

 

Wait... WG never told you to trow the game, camp base, yolo instantly or stay on the red line with the others they talked to?



Maick3l #23 Posted 17 November 2019 - 02:31 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11357 battles
  • 29
  • Member since:
    12-26-2014

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 16 November 2019 - 11:38 PM, said:

 

There's no elephant. If you're trying to blame WG rigging your games for your 42% WR because your a Edited in chat then the solution is simple, keep your mouth shut. There will be two possible outcomes. Either your WR will go up, which will prove WG rigged your games or it'll make no difference to your WR because there is no rigging and you just suck. 


37.5% win rate I had today. I just suck right? /s

More than afk bots apparently


Edited by Asklepi0s, 17 November 2019 - 10:34 AM.


Bulldog_Drummond #24 Posted 17 November 2019 - 02:34 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33569 battles
  • 10,726
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

View PostMaick3l, on 16 November 2019 - 08:02 PM, said:

Beginning to suspect Wargaming has a "naughty list" with rule disobeying players. The matchmaker is clearly designed for more losses than victories to occur. Every parameter other than win rate is going up. Win rate is going down and fast with about -10 to -14% on average each month. How a player can improve his play and only win about 36-40% matches is beyond me

 

Getting above 36% win rate is indeed a tough hill to climb unless you buy the Fort Knox premium gold offer



Inappropriate_noob #25 Posted 17 November 2019 - 03:00 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 17487 battles
  • 5,354
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

Oh I hope I am on the naughty list,I will be very unhappy if I am not,seeing as no matter what I do I suspect WG have put an algorithm inplace to make sure my WR never goes above 43.07.

 

 

I jest ofc,there is no bad list or sneaky algorithms, I just can't play this game.



Tealo #26 Posted 17 November 2019 - 03:34 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43132 battles
  • 391
  • [RIFF] RIFF
  • Member since:
    04-26-2012

View PostMaick3l, on 17 November 2019 - 01:31 AM, said:


37.5% win rate I had today. I just suck right? /s

More than afk bots apparently


 There is a possibility you have been put in the naughty list (nerfed MM and RNG) not for just being toxic in chat but also for certain mod use :unsure: (and playing on weekends) :facepalm:

 Yes it is LEGAL! This is a computer game Not ‘The Sands’ casino in Las Vegas, subject to tight highly regulated  gambling laws.

Many game companies have done this from Activision, Blizzard to Zanga All have done this and are doing it it’s a wide spread practice and industrial standard used in MMOs.

https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2015/09/07/the-best-punishments-for-mmo-cheaters/ 

 


Edited by Tealo, 17 November 2019 - 03:37 AM.


Spurtung #27 Posted 17 November 2019 - 04:22 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 74936 battles
  • 6,833
  • [WG_PT] WG_PT
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostMaick3l, on 16 November 2019 - 08:02 PM, said:

Beginning to suspect Wargaming has a "naughty list" with rule disobeying players. The matchmaker is clearly designed for more losses than victories to occur. Every parameter other than win rate is going up. Win rate is going down and fast with about -10 to -14% on average each month. How a player can improve his play and only win about 36-40% matches is beyond me




EdvinE20 #28 Posted 17 November 2019 - 04:35 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Community Contributor
  • 40341 battles
  • 958
  • [-AEG-] -AEG-
  • Member since:
    06-16-2011
:facepalm:

Spurtung #29 Posted 17 November 2019 - 05:23 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 74936 battles
  • 6,833
  • [WG_PT] WG_PT
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostMaick3l, on 16 November 2019 - 09:25 PM, said:

View Postbarison1, on 16 November 2019 - 10:17 PM, said:

wot-life shows 42% winrate with 137 games and 1.6k wn8 of past 30days. look it up yourself, will show the same

 

also do like how you mention that i so exaggerate, nitpick, insult. plain irony

 

 

 

https://en.wot-life.com/eu/player/Maick3l-524941677/


So this is your definitive answer? That a player with 1600 wn8 should have 42% win rate? This is correct right? Oh the irony

 

No, that's not his "answer": those are the FACTS he used to illustrate how bad you are and which you dismissed saying he was nitpicking and exaggerating while making a fool of yourself.



BR33K1_PAWAH #30 Posted 17 November 2019 - 07:30 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7539 battles
  • 1,611
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View PostMaick3l, on 16 November 2019 - 11:02 PM, said:

Beginning to suspect Wargaming has a "naughty list" with rule disobeying players. The matchmaker is clearly designed for more losses than victories to occur. Every parameter other than win rate is going up. Win rate is going down and fast with about -10 to -14% on average each month. How a player can improve his play and only win about 36-40% matches is beyond me

 

Good observation buddy, i suspect that too. I too am certain that when i get to a loose streak that it's WG rigging their matchmaker just for me.

Because it's just makes sense.

 

Because as we know, WoT is a zero sum game with 29(!) players which are randomly picked and insane amount of rng at each(!) of those 29(! exclamation mark, again) players in-game action which they may(or may not! :ohmy:) take in a battle, and it's absolutely clear, that with this huge amount of random variables, there is no way i can get a loose streak without WG specifically rigging MM just for me.

 

Because my contribution of 1 player out of 30(!!  two exclamation marks this time, just for you bud) is just too damn great. 

Because it must be, right? 

Because my world, and my World of Tanks, revolves around me, right?

 

;)

06:34 Added after 3 minute

View PostMaick3l, on 16 November 2019 - 11:55 PM, said:


Even if the team had only 10 players, a constant afk player should have 40% win rate on average with a small margin of error. He is one out of 10 and accounts for 10%, on average. That's precise math.

 


Edited by BR33K1_PAWAH, 17 November 2019 - 07:32 AM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #31 Posted 17 November 2019 - 08:12 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 34443 battles
  • 4,837
  • [FISHY] FISHY
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015

View PostMaick3l, on 17 November 2019 - 02:31 AM, said:


37.5% win rate I had today. I just suck right? /s

More than afk bots apparently

 

Yes, you suck. Or got unlucky, but either way there's still no 'special' list or algorithm that WG uses to rig the games of players that offend them. If such a thing did exist then SirFoch would be number one on it and he seems to have no problem maintaining his super unicum status no matter how salty he gets.

 

WR fluctuates over the short term, but if your getting a poor WR over the longer term the problem is you. 



Asklepi0s #32 Posted 17 November 2019 - 10:40 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Veteran
  • 10940 battles
  • 1,151
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    01-23-2017
Thread is closed due to being non constructive.

Solstad1069 #33 Posted 17 November 2019 - 10:43 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 45041 battles
  • 3,641
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013

View PostMaick3l, on 16 November 2019 - 09:02 PM, said:

Beginning to suspect Wargaming has a "naughty list" with rule disobeying players. The matchmaker is clearly designed for more losses than victories to occur. Every parameter other than win rate is going up. Win rate is going down and fast with about -10 to -14% on average each month. How a player can improve his play and only win about 36-40% matches is beyond me

 

Without seeing your stats i bet your average tier is also going up. Thats the answer.



Miepie #34 Posted 17 November 2019 - 11:09 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4726 battles
  • 1,384
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018

View PostAsklepi0s, on 17 November 2019 - 10:40 AM, said:

Thread is closed due to being non constructive.

Have some coffee on this cold november morning; it helps. :great:



Xandania #35 Posted 17 November 2019 - 11:38 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 43921 battles
  • 1,778
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013

View PostLincolnTank, on 16 November 2019 - 08:47 PM, said:




Erwin_Von_Braun #36 Posted 17 November 2019 - 12:23 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 43203 battles
  • 6,463
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

Thought this thread was closed?

:unsure:



Bordhaw #37 Posted 17 November 2019 - 12:31 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 15264 battles
  • 5,187
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostMaick3l, on 16 November 2019 - 08:02 PM, said:

Win rate is going down and fast with about -10 to -14% on average each month. How a player can improve his play and only win about 36-40% matches is beyond me

 

Stop playing heavy tanks...

 



unhappy_bunny #38 Posted 17 November 2019 - 01:13 PM

    Colonel

  • Moderator
  • 20130 battles
  • 3,707
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

All through my life I've had this strange unaccountable feeling that something was going on in the world, something big, even sinister, and no one would tell me what it was."
"No," said the old man, "that's just perfectly normal paranoia. Everyone in the Universe has that.

 

Perhaps I'm old and tired, but I think that the chances of finding out what's actually going on are so absurdly remote that the only thing to do is to say, "Hang the sense of it," and keep yourself busy. I'd much rather be happy than right any day.

 

And are you?" 
"No. That's where it all falls down, of course."
"Pity", said Arthur. "It sounded like rather a good lifestyle otherwise.”

 

 

 



mpf1959 #39 Posted 17 November 2019 - 04:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29928 battles
  • 1,789
  • Member since:
    10-29-2017

View PostMaick3l, on 16 November 2019 - 09:02 PM, said:

Beginning to suspect Wargaming has a "naughty list" with rule disobeying players. The matchmaker is clearly designed for more losses than victories to occur. Every parameter other than win rate is going up. Win rate is going down and fast with about -10 to -14% on average each month. How a player can improve his play and only win about 36-40% matches is beyond me

 

 



Maick3l #40 Posted 17 November 2019 - 04:50 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11357 battles
  • 29
  • Member since:
    12-26-2014

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 17 November 2019 - 08:12 AM, said:

 

Yes, you suck. Or got unlucky, but either way there's still no 'special' list or algorithm that WG uses to rig the games of players that offend them. If such a thing did exist then SirFoch would be number one on it and he seems to have no problem maintaining his super unicum status no matter how salty he gets.

 

WR fluctuates over the short term, but if your getting a poor WR over the longer term the problem is you. 


Yes you completely suck at logic. Official wot statistics disagree that I "suck". One that plays better than the majority shouldn't have a 40% win rate. Not even an afk player should have it that low, but you suck at mathematics too. "WR fluctuates over the short term" 4 months in a row is short term? Okay then, guess it will stabilize over the next few years, or perhaps decades. There are other ways to insult people you think pose ridiculous claims, such as calling them tinfoils and mocking them with more conspiracies. Just read other replies to my post and learn.







Also tagged with bad players, spammers, bots, eula, rigged, matchmaking, blacklist, blacklisted players, rng

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users