Jump to content


Circonflexes and Quickybaby on Anonymizer


  • Please log in to reply
148 replies to this topic

Poll: Circonflexes and Quickybaby (166 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Who got it right?

  1. Circon (144 votes [86.23%])

    Percentage of vote: 86.23%

  2. QB (23 votes [13.77%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.77%

Vote Hide poll

Bora_BOOM #1 Posted 22 November 2019 - 06:30 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 29130 battles
  • 4,027
  • [DID0] DID0
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

Interesting.


Edited by Bora_BOOM, 22 November 2019 - 07:06 PM.


Dexatroph #2 Posted 22 November 2019 - 06:41 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 48469 battles
  • 3,846
  • Member since:
    02-09-2013
Clearly Circon. Have watched QB's video first and was just thinking that he miss the point most of the time. Right now watched the video of Cirocn and he speaks out what I thought while watching QB's video. 

Edited by Dexatroph, 22 November 2019 - 06:44 PM.


Nishi_Kinuyo #3 Posted 22 November 2019 - 06:44 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 9315 battles
  • 6,613
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
You can deal with steam-sniping, you stop streaming. :P

jabster #4 Posted 22 November 2019 - 06:57 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12771 battles
  • 26,279
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostBora_BOOM, on 22 November 2019 - 05:30 PM, said:

Interesting.


So care to explain what you think is interesting about it?t

 

On a more positive note, at least you can vote for both options.


Edited by jabster, 22 November 2019 - 07:04 PM.


SovietBias #5 Posted 22 November 2019 - 06:58 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39101 battles
  • 1,699
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013
Meh.

AXIS_OF_RESISTANCE #6 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:02 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4049 battles
  • 427
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    12-21-2017
The comments on QB video are refreshing :popcorn:.

divsmo #7 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37623 battles
  • 586
  • [BEXF] BEXF
  • Member since:
    07-08-2012
I agree with circon on this one, but it will be interesting to see if enough people use the anonymizer to make it actually work.

BR33K1_PAWAH #8 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:05 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7664 battles
  • 1,732
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018
Mmeh.

Bora_BOOM #9 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:11 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 29130 battles
  • 4,027
  • [DID0] DID0
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View Postjabster, on 22 November 2019 - 05:57 PM, said:


So care to explain what you think is interesting about it?t

 

On a more positive note, at least you can vote for both options.

Interesting is that we haven't had different attitudes faced in a form of calling out one by the other. Not that I find that good or bad, but just saying it's interesting. Only my opinion. 

Tnx for the note, fixed the poll. I think I have picked choose only one answer before adding the second one, but it got changed to two by itself which I find silly. 


Edited by Bora_BOOM, 22 November 2019 - 07:12 PM.


Bordhaw #10 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:12 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 15308 battles
  • 5,225
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostDexatroph, on 22 November 2019 - 05:41 PM, said:

Have watched QB's video first and was just thinking that he miss the point most of the time. Right now watched the video of Cirocn and he speaks out what I thought while watching QB's video. 

 

Nah I think  Circon is missing the point QB was trying to make. "But, at the end of the day......"



Dexatroph #11 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:15 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 48469 battles
  • 3,846
  • Member since:
    02-09-2013

View PostBordhaw, on 22 November 2019 - 08:12 PM, said:

 

Nah I think  Circon is missing the point QB was trying to make. "But, at the end of the day......"

 

Whats his point? I dont see any reasonable point done by QB. He uses false arguments from my perspective. 



jabster #12 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:16 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12771 battles
  • 26,279
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostBora_BOOM, on 22 November 2019 - 06:11 PM, said:

Interesting is that we haven't had different attitudes faced in a form of calling out one by the other. Not that I find that good or bad, but just saying it's interesting. Only my opinion. 

Tnx for the note, fixed the poll. I think I have picked choose only one answer before adding the second one, but it got changed to two by itself which I find silly. 


Just saying I find this interesting is hardly helpful.

 

Oh and I happened to come across a Mighty Jingles video featuring you, interesting I must say.


Edited by jabster, 23 November 2019 - 12:20 AM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #13 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:20 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 34502 battles
  • 4,863
  • [FISHY] FISHY
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
QB is right, the only people it really benefits are the really good players like himself, Circon etc. Everyone else nobody gives enough of a crap about to ever focus down in any meaningful way. 

FrantisekBascovansky #14 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33024 battles
  • 847
  • Member since:
    03-26-2018
Any streamer reacting to Circons video reacting to QBs video reacting to WG video?

24doom24 #15 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:28 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8715 battles
  • 649
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012
QB thinks the world revolves around him.

LCpl_Jones #16 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:42 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13392 battles
  • 1,357
  • Member since:
    06-17-2017

meh.

stats in game are so such a miniscule 'problem' compared to the rest of the game it's irrelevant. i seriously doubt the plummeting player numbers is due to stats in battle. :sceptic:



Blubba #17 Posted 22 November 2019 - 07:53 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 61036 battles
  • 2,417
  • Member since:
    05-30-2011

It's the guys at the extremes that suffer the most.

The guy at the top will get focused simply because he's the best target to remove from the battle field.

The guy at the bottom has to put up with the abuse and as there's far more of them, I'd guess it's far more prevalent.

Everyone has to suffer the special people who say "Lost" and then jump into the nearest lake.

It seems a good thing in my view.

 



ChristOfTheAbyss #18 Posted 22 November 2019 - 08:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 251 battles
  • 541
  • Member since:
    07-22-2019

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 22 November 2019 - 07:20 PM, said:

QB is right, the only people it really benefits are the really good players like himself, Circon etc. Everyone else nobody gives enough of a crap about to ever focus down in any meaningful way. 

 

Am not a streamer yet getr focused all the time. Being the only one arty shoots while not positioning myself any different, more or less aggressive than my teammates, getinng focused by top tier tanks while being bottom tier and not a thread at all etc. etc. IT's 100% thing. You cant deny it without having experienced it.



Bora_BOOM #19 Posted 22 November 2019 - 08:12 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 29130 battles
  • 4,027
  • [DID0] DID0
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View Postjabster, on 22 November 2019 - 06:16 PM, said:


Just saying I find this interesting is hardly helpful.

 

Oh and I happened to come on a Mighty Jingles video featuring you, interesting I must say.

 

Hehe, not helpful, but I had to make some job for Mods to kick this to video section sooner or later.

At least I wasn't sorted to the bad or the ugly by the salt mine master! :teethhappy:



Spurtung #20 Posted 22 November 2019 - 08:13 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 75074 battles
  • 6,864
  • [WG_PT] WG_PT
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

Judging by my answer to the poll, both.

And I watched neither.

 

Democracy is beautiful.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users