Jump to content


Who looks better? WT Auf E 100 or FV4005


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

Poll: Who looks better? (24 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Which tank looks better (cooler)?

  1. Waffentrager Auf E 100 (16 votes [66.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 66.67%

  2. FV4005 (8 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

Vote Hide poll

lime_vortep #1 Posted 30 November 2019 - 07:25 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12433 battles
  • 454
  • [BGAVP] BGAVP
  • Member since:
    02-28-2016

Funny question. Both tanks were two of the most feared tanks in the game and yet both were make fun of because of the way they looked. But witch one looks better In your opinion? 

 

Some pictures: 

 

 



The_Naa #2 Posted 30 November 2019 - 07:30 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9481 battles
  • 1,638
  • [QSF-C] QSF-C
  • Member since:
    11-10-2017

well the fact that the FV only has paint on the hull makes the WT automatic winner in my book.

 

the paint just on the hull looks like a sweater.

its full camo paint or colour paint on the tank or nothing at all.


Edited by The_Naa, 30 November 2019 - 08:36 PM.


splash_time #3 Posted 30 November 2019 - 07:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13526 battles
  • 690
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-20-2018
ofc WT.

Nishi_Kinuyo #4 Posted 30 November 2019 - 07:49 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 9319 battles
  • 6,623
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011
FV because it actually existed¹.

pihip #5 Posted 30 November 2019 - 08:13 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16204 battles
  • 1,316
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View PostNishi_Kinuyo, on 30 November 2019 - 07:49 PM, said:

FV because it actually existed¹.


I voted FV for the same reason.

Also, you have a craphouse built in the turret, how can that not be cool? :trollface:



Forcellrus #6 Posted 30 November 2019 - 08:19 PM

    Sergeant

  • Moderator
  • 14887 battles
  • 213
  • [DSCRD] DSCRD
  • Member since:
    03-22-2014
I always liked the unique looks of the WT and the fact it is quite different from a "conventional" tank design.

Andrius #7 Posted 30 November 2019 - 08:20 PM

    Corporal

  • Beta Tester
  • 18489 battles
  • 115
  • Member since:
    01-21-2011

Neither of them look great. But at least the FV looks somewhat realistic. And the gun looks great.

 

The WT on the other hand looks unrealistic and weird. To me it doesn't look like it could function at all without building a bunch of scaffolding at the back of it... It really doesnt look like there is enough space for the gunner/loaders to stand on, specially if you turn the turret sideways...



Erwin_Von_Braun #8 Posted 30 November 2019 - 08:36 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 43253 battles
  • 6,498
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

Voted FV.

But please, change the cam so it all matches - as others have said - whole tank, or not at all.

 



shikaka9 #9 Posted 30 November 2019 - 08:43 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 72193 battles
  • 1,315
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
FV one shots WTe

Edited by shikaka9, 30 November 2019 - 08:43 PM.


ThorgrimBrenadim #10 Posted 04 December 2019 - 11:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34532 battles
  • 622
  • Member since:
    06-22-2012

FV But then I am biased as it is in my garage.

 

Erwin could this be classed as direct fire arty?????  lol.

 

I would like the Waffle as well HINT ! Wargamming :)






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users