9 replies to this topic

[lime_vortep]

Funny question. Both tanks were two of the most feared tanks in the game and yet both were make fun of because of the way they looked. But witch one looks better In your opinion? 

 

Some pictures: 

 

 

[The_Naa]

well the fact that the FV only has paint on the hull makes the WT automatic winner in my book.

 

the paint just on the hull looks like a sweater.

its full camo paint or colour paint on the tank or nothing at all.

Edited by The_Naa, 30 November 2019 - 08:36 PM.

[splash_time]

ofc WT.

[Nishi_Kinuyo]

FV because it actually existed¹.

[pihip]

Nishi_Kinuyo, on 30 November 2019 - 07:49 PM, said:

FV because it actually existed¹.

I voted FV for the same reason.

Also, you have a craphouse built in the turret, how can that not be cool?

[Forcellrus]

I always liked the unique looks of the WT and the fact it is quite different from a "conventional" tank design.

[Andrius]

Neither of them look great. But at least the FV looks somewhat realistic. And the gun looks great.

 

The WT on the other hand looks unrealistic and weird. To me it doesn't look like it could function at all without building a bunch of scaffolding at the back of it... It really doesnt look like there is enough space for the gunner/loaders to stand on, specially if you turn the turret sideways...

[Erwin_Von_Braun]

Voted FV.

But please, change the cam so it all matches - as others have said - whole tank, or not at all.

 

[shikaka9]

FV one shots WTe

Edited by shikaka9, 30 November 2019 - 08:43 PM.

[ThorgrimBrenadim]

FV But then I am biased as it is in my garage.

 

Erwin could this be classed as direct fire arty?????  lol.

 

I would like the Waffle as well HINT ! Wargamming