Jump to content


Buff FV4005 or make other tier X !


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

iamz3th #1 Posted 13 December 2019 - 09:35 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20002 battles
  • 11
  • [BROTH] BROTH
  • Member since:
    12-24-2013

Hello Wargaming community! I spent like 1 month grinding trough FV4005 line and back then it wasn't very good. Now you shoot once and then you die! They made it unplayable! You don't have Camo ( a heavy outspots you even if you are in a bush), elevation is bad, dispersion is bad, speed is bad and so ON. But OBJ 430U is balanced.... Wargaming  Chariotter and Conway are fun to play with and then you get a JOKE of a TANK (Shitbarn). Buff it or change the tank all together please!  You buffed Type 5 Heavy witch was OP and you nerfed FV4005 wich needed a buff ...Good JOB!


Edited by iamz3th, 13 December 2019 - 09:41 AM.


DuncaN_101 #2 Posted 13 December 2019 - 09:39 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 57081 battles
  • 3,225
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
Did you actually do some research before grinding this line tho?

Because all things you mentioned here are well known and kind of the price you pay for having a fire and forget gun.

iamz3th #3 Posted 13 December 2019 - 09:44 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20002 battles
  • 11
  • [BROTH] BROTH
  • Member since:
    12-24-2013
Dude i had the tank before the nerf and it was not very good, but now they made it  unplayable !

xx984 #4 Posted 13 December 2019 - 09:46 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 65829 battles
  • 3,716
  • [HOOT] HOOT
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

Would anyone who remotely knows me be surprised if I said I agree?

 

 

make 4005 great again 



tumppi776 #5 Posted 13 December 2019 - 09:52 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 49412 battles
  • 2,533
  • [T-BAD] T-BAD
  • Member since:
    01-27-2014
i vote change it altogether. 1800dmg with 200+ pen is just - stupid

GodTank2 #6 Posted 13 December 2019 - 09:57 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9011 battles
  • 309
  • [RF_] RF_
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012

Yea give idiots the ability to shoot anywhere on a tank, do 700 dmg and be able to get away with it.

The fact that you can pen someone with 200 pen and do 1.8k dmg is already stupid enough. 

Just remove this piece of trash from the game


Edited by GodTank2, 13 December 2019 - 09:57 AM.


BQBD #7 Posted 13 December 2019 - 10:00 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16166 battles
  • 160
  • Member since:
    11-02-2018

View PostGodTank2, on 13 December 2019 - 09:57 AM, said:

Yea give idiots the ability to shoot anywhere on a tank, do 700 dmg and be able to get away with it.

The fact that you can pen someone with 200 pen and do 1.8k dmg is already stupid enough. 

Just remove this piece of trash from the game


:great:



BR33K1_PAWAH #8 Posted 13 December 2019 - 10:15 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 8158 battles
  • 2,079
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018
How about no? 

iamz3th #9 Posted 13 December 2019 - 10:53 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20002 battles
  • 11
  • [BROTH] BROTH
  • Member since:
    12-24-2013
i don't know if they care of the community opinion, but is worth to try!

BQBD #10 Posted 13 December 2019 - 11:00 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16166 battles
  • 160
  • Member since:
    11-02-2018

View Postiamz3th, on 13 December 2019 - 10:53 AM, said:

i don't know if they care of the community opinion, but is worth to try!

 

They do, that is why they nerfed it!

 

This no skill, no aim HE spamming monstrosity should have never been implemented into the game.



AeyT #11 Posted 13 December 2019 - 11:24 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 6938 battles
  • 134
  • Member since:
    05-25-2019

There is no place for retarded almost 2k alpha one shot guns in the game.

The thing is garbage and its better that it stays that way.



MeetriX #12 Posted 13 December 2019 - 11:27 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 24895 battles
  • 4,165
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

You spend a month for grinding a tank that was nerfed already?

Wow!



tajj7 #13 Posted 13 December 2019 - 11:59 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 28892 battles
  • 16,980
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014
it's garbage because the alpha is stupidly broken. 

Krazy_Kalle #14 Posted 13 December 2019 - 12:21 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 18293 battles
  • 131
  • [VIECH] VIECH
  • Member since:
    11-01-2016

So you want WG to make the tank fitting to your playstyle?

Would you tell the government they should change the laws to fit your lifestyle as well?

 

Every Tier X in the game is playable, you just have to adapt to what you have with the tank. I've even had some cracking matches in my Tier X german light tank



xx984 #15 Posted 13 December 2019 - 12:23 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 65829 battles
  • 3,716
  • [HOOT] HOOT
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View PostKrazy_Kalle, on 13 December 2019 - 11:21 AM, said:

Every Tier X in the game is playable, you just have to adapt to what you have with the tank. I've even had some cracking matches in my Tier X german light tank

M a n t i c o r e

 

:hiding:



Krazy_Kalle #16 Posted 13 December 2019 - 12:24 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 18293 battles
  • 131
  • [VIECH] VIECH
  • Member since:
    11-01-2016

View Postxx984, on 13 December 2019 - 12:23 PM, said:

M a n t i c o r e

 

:hiding:

 

It is just really hard to make that work :D

I actually started that line in hope it would get buffed, but seems like WG needs to make new premiums instead :coin:



Gixxer66 #17 Posted 13 December 2019 - 01:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19721 battles
  • 824
  • [-AWF-] -AWF-
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View Postxx984, on 13 December 2019 - 11:23 AM, said:

M a n t i c o r e

 

:hiding:

 

I watched Yzne stream 3 marking it - he seemed to make it work OK.

 

An average of 2.9K Damage per game and 3.3 spots .........

 

Git gud /kappa



ThorgrimBrenadim #18 Posted 13 December 2019 - 01:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 35557 battles
  • 727
  • Member since:
    06-22-2012

View PostBQBD, on 13 December 2019 - 11:00 AM, said:

 

They do, that is why they nerfed it!

 

This no skill, no aim HE spamming monstrosity should have never been implemented into the game.


LOL No skill No aim have you  ever played it ? it's aim is slow and since they nerfed it yes it is almost unplayable but then they do not want tanks that can actually challenge Russian supremacy and especially not one that ACTUALLY EXISTED ! Unlike some other vehicles in the game.

It has pretty much ZERO armour it's only advantage was the gun yes it was deadly and rightly so. For it's tier it is no worse than KV-2 or some of the SU Russian TD's at mid tiers that can do over 700 damage a shot and easily one shot same and lower tier tanks.

12:56 Added after 4 minute

View PostKrazy_Kalle, on 13 December 2019 - 12:21 PM, said:

So you want WG to make the tank fitting to your playstyle?

Would you tell the government they should change the laws to fit your lifestyle as well?

 

Every Tier X in the game is playable, you just have to adapt to what you have with the tank. I've even had some cracking matches in my Tier X german light tank

 

No the tank should fit the role it was designed for taking out super heavy's the only reason it did not go into full production after testing was because missiles developed to a level they could do the role of the FV. It got nerfed because people complained who did not understand it's serious flaws which where super slow reload between shots and in the turret at least non existent armour and the hull was not much better.



Krazy_Kalle #19 Posted 13 December 2019 - 02:07 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 18293 battles
  • 131
  • [VIECH] VIECH
  • Member since:
    11-01-2016

View PostThorgrimBrenadim, on 13 December 2019 - 01:51 PM, said:

No the tank should fit the role it was designed for taking out super heavy's the only reason it did not go into full production after testing was because missiles developed to a level they could do the role of the FV. It got nerfed because people complained who did not understand it's serious flaws which where super slow reload between shots and in the turret at least non existent armour and the hull was not much better.

 

If I'm not mistaken, the Grille 15 actually was planned as a SPG and the Sheridan didn't have a Howitzer rathern than a rocket launcher.

If the tank would fit in its roll, i.e. taking out super heavies, it would be able to take out everything, except super fast tanks.

Another thing is, HESH Ammo isn't even designed to penetrate a tank, but instead: "The plastic explosive is "squashed" against the surface of the target on impact and spreads out"

Come on man, the argument for realistic represantion of the real world is long gone.



GodTank2 #20 Posted 13 December 2019 - 02:11 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9011 battles
  • 309
  • [RF_] RF_
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012

View PostThorgrimBrenadim, on 13 December 2019 - 01:51 PM, said:


LOL No skill No aim have you  ever played it ? it's aim is slow and since they nerfed it yes it is almost unplayable but then they do not want tanks that can actually challenge Russian supremacy and especially not one that ACTUALLY EXISTED ! Unlike some other vehicles in the game.

It has pretty much ZERO armour it's only advantage was the gun yes it was deadly and rightly so. For it's tier it is no worse than KV-2 or some of the SU Russian TD's at mid tiers that can do over 700 damage a shot and easily one shot same and lower tier tanks.

12:56 Added after 4 minute

 

No the tank should fit the role it was designed for taking out super heavy's the only reason it did not go into full production after testing was because missiles developed to a level they could do the role of the FV. It got nerfed because people complained who did not understand it's serious flaws which where super slow reload between shots and in the turret at least non existent armour and the hull was not much better.

 

But it doesnt only deal with heavy tanks. It can literally 1 shot any medium tank except the obj 430u






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users