Jump to content


WOT 2.0? Project Excalibur

WOT 2.0? Project Excalibur

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

Poll: WOT 2.0 Project Excalibur (25 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Introduce Project Excalibur to the gamers?

  1. Yes! (6 votes [24.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 24.00%

  2. No! (19 votes [76.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 76.00%

Vote Hide poll

ZDN #1 Posted 15 December 2019 - 11:28 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27468 battles
  • 193
  • [ONIX] ONIX
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011

Is it time for that great game named Project Excalibur ?

 

The videos from the year 2015 show us a great and new instalment for our fav tanks game(wot)

So is it time for a spin off,or a second branch from wot 1.0(classic ) to the new  era of tanks,and armored combat? Is it time for a glimpse in the future of wot?

Are you happy for Some sci-fi tanks that will blow you out of your chair?

 

So wargaming how about to add Project Excalibur to the game as a addon to wot,give us a new world to explore,give us the tier 11 tanks to tier 15 or 20?

 

Let us play the new era tanks if you have one tier 10 in wot classic (researched).the new tank will never play against lower tier tanks(11).


Edited by ZDN, 15 December 2019 - 11:29 AM.


24doom24 #2 Posted 15 December 2019 - 12:48 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8897 battles
  • 869
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012
Go play armoured warfare or war thunder if you want modern tanks.

shikaka9 #3 Posted 15 December 2019 - 01:06 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 73789 battles
  • 1,610
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
Project Excalibur, Roswell, Flat Earth ... all in same category  :harp:

Ratriq #4 Posted 15 December 2019 - 01:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6419 battles
  • 606
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-07-2013
Rather not, modern tanks are both personally ugly and more same-y, cause most modern tanks have just gone down the medium tank route.

BR33K1_PAWAH #5 Posted 15 December 2019 - 01:23 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 8158 battles
  • 2,079
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View Postshikaka9, on 15 December 2019 - 03:06 PM, said:

Project Excalibur, Roswell, Flat Earth ... all in same category  :harp:

 

Kennedy is alive. He lives on Mars with other reptiloids.



NekoPuffer_PPP #6 Posted 15 December 2019 - 01:30 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 35475 battles
  • 4,359
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

Most people won't go for modern tanks, I guess. Or is there a different reason Armored Warfare flopped?

 

People want Tigers, Shermans, T-54, Maus, etc. They draw in a bigger crowd than new tanks nobody's even heard of.

 

If it ain't broken, don't fix it.



ZDN #7 Posted 15 December 2019 - 01:50 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27468 battles
  • 193
  • [ONIX] ONIX
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011

AW did very good the first year before obsidian left the game,and after the russian company bought it, after that it was bad.the game changes and the long time to enter a battle made people dont play it,but now it is on the good track.Not as wot,but 10-30 sec to enter a battle.

 

People love modern tanks,and fast games so the teams dont camp and snipe.Plus the wargaming way was even better then the obsidian game.After years of play people have all the tier 10 tanks that they like/are good to play,and after ? The game will die.So you need some new blood in it,a new chapter.



Balc0ra #8 Posted 15 December 2019 - 02:14 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 74917 battles
  • 21,619
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View PostZDN, on 15 December 2019 - 01:50 PM, said:

AW did very good the first year before obsidian left the game,and after the russian company bought it, after that it was bad.the game changes and the long time to enter a battle made people dont play it,but now it is on the good track.Not as wot,but 10-30 sec to enter a battle.

 

No, they lost 90 of their players more or less instantly after open beta due to obsidian that wanted to do everything the players wanted at the same time. Thus there was no balance in the chaos. It's why my.com sacked them and did run it themself. After that, the player base has slowly gone up again after they did remove and rework most stuff.

 

But still... Most don't play WOT for modern tanks. So I'm too sure how many would play it here if it did come for WG to focus on it. And the studio that made 2.0 got shut down too.

 

 



Wintermute_1 #9 Posted 15 December 2019 - 05:51 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 52455 battles
  • 2,448
  • Member since:
    11-25-2013
I think the main reason WG don't want to add tiers (for modern tanks) is because it spreads the player base thinner over a larger number of games with the knock on increased queue times etc. Spreading players out like that just brings the overall falling player numbers into sharper focus. 

Xandania #10 Posted 15 December 2019 - 05:53 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44420 battles
  • 1,798
  • [-DGN-] -DGN-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
The only video I remember including modern tanks was released April first.

The_Baba_Yaga #11 Posted 15 December 2019 - 06:51 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 2078 battles
  • 161
  • Member since:
    01-31-2017
-

Edited by The_Baba_Yaga, 24 December 2019 - 12:31 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users