Jump to content

WoT = casino

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
13 replies to this topic

MauDaFOCA #1 Posted 15 December 2019 - 10:58 PM


  • Player
  • 36339 battles
  • 118
  • [POR-1] POR-1
  • Member since:


Wot is a casino, and a RIGGED ONE!


Of all the B.S. they have been doing to the game, last ones surpass any decency.
Just look at this game on wotreplays (search my nikname for today sunday) , how a hellcat bounces 2 times on a lower tier leopard and how the hellcat does only track to a tier5 arty with ZERO damage 2x on a row "!!!!

what's next WG? a E100 will bounce on tier7 light? The premium meds will become impenetrable so you can sell more BS? the artys will be back to one shot one kill?

what will the next RIGGED move you will had to this casino.

better start callling roulette to some tanks or black-Jack to others!!!

call dice to tier8 or solitaire to tier9.. it will be more close to the truth.

YOU S U C K WARGAMING.. you have been ruining what used to be a nice game into a roll the dice game.

RNG is not random... its so obviously PRE-PROGRAMED that it cant be hidden anymore... many of us players see it clear.

And some forum trolls speak about skills... for years now its not about skills, its just about LUCK. with paid dudes like Quickybaby getting a special RNG on their behalve.

damm current programers. you killed this game.







22:00 Added after 1 minute

and damm me for having spent some money in this BS game...

should had NEVER bought anything in this casino shop.


Orkbert #2 Posted 15 December 2019 - 11:07 PM


  • Player
  • 28780 battles
  • 2,281
  • Member since:
So I guess christmas presents will be wrapped with tinfoil this year?

Wintermute_1 #3 Posted 15 December 2019 - 11:09 PM


  • Player
  • 52421 battles
  • 2,444
  • Member since:
Rattle exits pram...

UserZer00 #4 Posted 15 December 2019 - 11:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 13608 battles
  • 1,068
  • Member since:

Well, at least it's not a rant about the X-mas boxes




BravelyRanAway #5 Posted 15 December 2019 - 11:11 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 24701 battles
  • 12,475
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
Oooh....so edgy!

Shivvering #6 Posted 15 December 2019 - 11:18 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35610 battles
  • 448
  • Member since:

Oh my god - I've never thought of it like this.


You've convinced me. The revolution starts here.


Viva la TrueRNG!

Edited by Shivvering, 15 December 2019 - 11:19 PM.

Spurtung #7 Posted 15 December 2019 - 11:23 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 76209 battles
  • 7,182
  • [WG_PT] WG_PT
  • Member since:
tl,dr: mimimimimimimi

Edited by Spurtung, 15 December 2019 - 11:24 PM.

Homer_J #8 Posted 15 December 2019 - 11:59 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 33143 battles
  • 36,630
  • Member since:
Well, to quote the Senet group.  When the fun stops, stop.

PeaceWalker1 #9 Posted 16 December 2019 - 12:00 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18029 battles
  • 1,278
  • [-WIR_] -WIR_
  • Member since:

View PostMauDaFOCA, on 15 December 2019 - 10:58 PM, said:




Have you ever considerd that you and WG have something in common then ?

NUKLEAR_SLUG #10 Posted 16 December 2019 - 12:02 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 35287 battles
  • 5,209
  • Member since:

View PostMauDaFOCA, on 15 December 2019 - 10:58 PM, said:

... for years now its not about skills, its just about LUCK. .


The standard cry of every failure. Git gud. 

DuncaN_101 #11 Posted 16 December 2019 - 12:09 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 57081 battles
  • 3,214
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
i think someone needs a hug.

Balc0ra #12 Posted 16 December 2019 - 12:19 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 74866 battles
  • 21,596
  • Member since:

View PostMauDaFOCA, on 15 December 2019 - 10:58 PM, said:

RNG is not random... its so obviously PRE-PROGRAMED that it cant be hidden anymore... many of us players see it clear.


Thing is... WG did not program you to fire before the aim did settle did they? As I found the replay. And that was most of your shots. You fired when you were on the target vs waiting for the aim to settle. You did it on the KV-1, you did it on the flakbuss. Rushed shots.




And on the Leo? You sat in the same spot waiting for him to show that 1 pixel. And that one pixel for ages. And when you found it? You hit his rear 30mm turret at more than 70 degrees. As in where you aimed. And your gun caliber is not more than 3 bigger than his armor, thus it bounced right off. Nothing more then that.


Then we have the M44... You fired the first shots with about half an aim. And it hit exactly where you aimed.... on the tracks. So if you don't want to hit the tracks... Don't aim for it. It's that simple.


The next shots? You let the aim settle, then moved the sight towards his center hull, then moved it BACK to the tracks to fire and hit them. Why? No idea. And again you hit where you aimed. Then you went on a rant vs killing it, and you got killed. Throwing the game.


Moral of the story? Aim where you want to hit, if you don't want to hit tracks. Don't aim for tracks. And when you have all the time in the world. Let the aim settle. You fired so many half aimed shots doing nothing. And also.... Chat less and fire more. You had 3 targets 100m in front you 100% ignored to yell at the T67 that "stole your kill", inc a Chaffe that almost got 50m close to you. Game was almost thrown there if T67 did not react.



Edited by Balc0ra, 16 December 2019 - 12:21 AM.

NekoPuffer_PPP #13 Posted 16 December 2019 - 12:19 AM


  • Player
  • 35436 battles
  • 4,348
  • Member since:

View PostMauDaFOCA, on 15 December 2019 - 10:58 PM, said:



Someone please explain to me, how that guy can have THAT name for all these years and not have it banned or changed, but when I had the word "pervy" in mine it was force-changed?

ValkyrionX #14 Posted 16 December 2019 - 12:24 AM


  • Moderator
  • 55624 battles
  • 2,885
  • Member since:
Decidedly non-constructive thread, only sterile complaints , thread closed.

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users