Jump to content

What is/are the worst tank(s) per nation?


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

Hamsterkicker #81 Posted 21 December 2019 - 10:38 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39588 battles
  • 803
  • Member since:

CHN: WZ 132 A...

CZE: TVP VTU by miles... skip as much of it as you can.. but keep some free XP for the first modules of the Skoda T50 as well.
FRA: Any TD above tier 5.

GER: Close call between Emil and Tiger II.

ITA: -None-

JPN: Type 4 heavy. With stock gun oh man still gives me nightmares.

POL: 25TP..

SWE: tier 7 TD I would say..

UK: Churchills are a pain. FV304 is also just a shadow of it former self after the stun mechanic became introduced.
USA: No need to skip anything.

USSR: Object 416, for me at least. I just can't make this tank work..




alKY_UniQe #82 Posted 26 January 2020 - 01:09 AM


  • Player
  • 9945 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:

View PostMaauru, on 17 December 2019 - 


F***ing pain in [edited]this BS, the same as its predecessor at tier IV...god dammit those terrible derp guns, no armour, poor mobility, god bless its good cammo but in low tier totally useless with no crew...

bleeee...if higher tier is the same crap, there is no point to play this absolutely frustrating line just because of tier X 


apaleytos #83 Posted 26 January 2020 - 04:27 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17153 battles
  • 575
  • Member since:

People mentioning tanks like challenger,arlv39,tiger 1 etc. All of them are playable.


Challenger has a turret,speed,definately usable.Only AP shell speed is bad.

Arlv39 with 105mm gun and apcr spam has great dpm,330 alpha,nice camo and speed.Can actually snipe not like SU-100.


Played TigerP,AMX M4(rebought after years) and KV3 during holidays.KV3 is far worse.


Tiger P has "some armor" to occasionally bounce if you wiggle the hull,gun is accurate(dpm is bad) and can have 445 view range.Not pleasant experience.AMX with 105mm gun and apcr was playable,just dont rely on the armor at all.

Kv3 pure potato :trollface:



CHN: T-34-2( not buying it)

CZE: Tvp vtu

FRA: Amx 65t

GER: St.emil (when you unlock the big gun might have some decent games)

ITA: All of them look playable


POL: Haven't checked them

SWE: Haven't checked them

UK: Churchils and black prince and the TD that goes in reverse.

USA: T-28 looks pain in the ... to grind,at least prot has a turret.

USSR: The med line with rear mounted turet looks bad.



Edited by apaleytos, 26 January 2020 - 04:31 AM.

fwhaatpiraat #84 Posted 26 January 2020 - 07:42 AM


  • Player
  • 61356 battles
  • 2,236
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
I agree with @apaleytos above. Arl v39 wth the 330 alpha gun/shells is actually a quite good vehicle. The (gun handling?) buffs to do this vehicle were good. The long 240 alpha gun is a terrible choice, but looks funny.
The tier 7 amx is way worse. Longer reload and 30 less alpha than the arl v39. And beyond horrible gun handling. This one deserves the hate, not the arl.
Challenger used to be next level dog poo, with the 150 alpha gun, horrible traverse and even worse bloom values. Current vehicle/gun is completely different.

Rumpelhonk #85 Posted 26 January 2020 - 04:11 PM


  • Player
  • 49672 battles
  • 109
  • Member since:

I only play Ger and USSR.


Ger: RHM Pzw.

USSR: Obj. 257


At least i suck in them big time...

CrySpy #86 Posted 26 January 2020 - 05:09 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25782 battles
  • 1,045
  • Member since:

CHN: T-34-2

CZE: Defender slayer

FRA: Arl made me want to kill myself

GER: Sturer

ITA: Dunno never tried spaghet

JPN: Type 61 (prebuff at least)

POL: [edited]

SWE: lol svensker

UK: guessing churchill gamecarrier

USA: Probably T28p but I neverplaye it so I'll say Pershing

USSR: IS-3 so bad reeee

Also tagged with Blueprints

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users