Jump to content


What is/are the worst tank(s) per nation?

Blueprints

  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

Miepie #21 Posted 17 December 2019 - 12:12 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 5335 battles
  • 1,622
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018
So many people hating on the low-tier Italian ones… I liked the P26/40. :unsure:

Kissa_ei_kuulu_pakkaseen #22 Posted 17 December 2019 - 12:23 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9825 battles
  • 314
  • [OISPA] OISPA
  • Member since:
    01-01-2018

On page 2 and only 1 mention of 110?

 

I just unlocked and was going to use blue prints to skip the tank, but should I rather unlock the top gun on it to save the free exp? Is it any playable now when tier 8 is full of E75 & 2-barreled Ojb?



undutchable80 #23 Posted 17 December 2019 - 12:29 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13561 battles
  • 4,509
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014

View PostKissa_ei_kuulu_pakkaseen, on 17 December 2019 - 12:23 PM, said:

On page 2 and only 1 mention of 110?

 

I just unlocked and was going to use blue prints to skip the tank, but should I rather unlock the top gun on it to save the free exp? Is it any playable now when tier 8 is full of E75 & 2-barreled Ojb?

TBF, if I had the BPs then, I would have used them to skip the 110. Even though I did ok in it, I hated this tank.



Dramakid19 #24 Posted 17 December 2019 - 12:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20616 battles
  • 110
  • [V1PER] V1PER
  • Member since:
    11-10-2016

Chn: type t34

Swe:ikv 65

Cz: tvp vtu

French: amd 17b

Germ: ferdinand

Bri: black prince and churchill

Rus: kv-85

Ital: all quite nice

Amer: t28

Didnt play polish ones

Jap: o ho, tier 6 medium one



PowJay #25 Posted 17 December 2019 - 12:40 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 41314 battles
  • 5,831
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

View PostMiepie, on 17 December 2019 - 11:12 AM, said:

So many people hating on the low-tier Italian ones… I liked the P26/40. :unsure:

All three still in my garage. The main reason for the low battle count on the P.43 is that I had a trained female crew from last year's Festive event and I haven't played it since researching the tier VI. The other two I continued to play for Sixth Sense.

 

 



Schepel #26 Posted 17 December 2019 - 12:42 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 66757 battles
  • 3,915
  • Member since:
    05-13-2013

CHN: T8/T9 mediums

CZE: TVP T8.

FRA: 65t, EBR90, T8 TD, T8/T9 arty

GER: arty. T7/T8 scouts.

ITA: --

JPN: --

POL: --

SWE: --

UK: All scouts. T7/T8/T9 arty.

USA: --

USSR: arty.

11:45 Added after 3 minute

View PostKissa_ei_kuulu_pakkaseen, on 17 December 2019 - 12:23 PM, said:

On page 2 and only 1 mention of 110?

 

I just unlocked and was going to use blue prints to skip the tank, but should I rather unlock the top gun on it to save the free exp? Is it any playable now when tier 8 is full of E75 & 2-barreled Ojb?

 

110 is perfectly playable fully upgraded. I'd definitely save the blueprints for the T-34-2 and T9 med.



kaneloon #27 Posted 17 December 2019 - 12:49 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 31718 battles
  • 4,172
  • [RHIN0] RHIN0
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

I stay away from the worst tanks, so I can't really testify.

Only one I would add is :

 

GER : Sturer Emil

 

So painful thay I grinded it over 2 years.

Ended the grind last week with a 1rst class at ... 800 xp ... that says it all.



TankkiPoju #28 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:21 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 24728 battles
  • 7,660
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostMiepie, on 17 December 2019 - 12:12 PM, said:

So many people hating on the low-tier Italian ones… I liked the P26/40. :unsure:

 

It is really a high explosive blast of a tank *nudge nudge wink wink*.



leggasiini #29 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:30 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 18168 battles
  • 6,486
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

If it's just tier 5 and higher:

 

CHN: T-34-2
CZE: TVP VTU
FRA: AMX 65T
GER: Panther II
ITA: P43
JPN: O-Ho :(
POL: 40TP
SWE: Ikv 90 II
UK: Setter
USA: Pershing or M103
USSR: not too many shitty tanks, probably a pick between MT-25 or 430 II


Edited by leggasiini, 17 December 2019 - 01:53 PM.


CPTANT #30 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:47 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8477 battles
  • 301
  • Member since:
    04-13-2012

View PostMiepie, on 17 December 2019 - 11:12 AM, said:

So many people hating on the low-tier Italian ones… I liked the P26/40. :unsure:

 

Tier IV meds and heavies are pretty unenjoyable in general. They are all gimped in some way, the meds don't have mobility and the heavies don't have armour. Also tier IV/V is IMO the largest tier wise performance gap. P26/40 isn't the worst of them though, the gun is good.


Edited by CPTANT, 17 December 2019 - 01:49 PM.


Warzey #31 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 60957 battles
  • 1,189
  • [GO0FY] GO0FY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

CHN: 110, WZ-120

CZE: TVP VTU

FRA: AMD 178B, AMX 65t, AMX M4 45

GER: St. Emil, whole Maus line from T7 and up

ITA: P.43 ter

JPN: Chi-Ri

POL: didn't play any

SWE: Ikv 90 B

UK: Black Prince, Churchill GC

USA: M103, T69

USSR: A-44, Obj 430 II, K-91



undutchable80 #32 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:49 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 13561 battles
  • 4,509
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-30-2014
Surprised no mention of the UK non-turreted TD line. AT2, AT8, AT7 and AT15 are all considered playable?

Warzey #33 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:51 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 60957 battles
  • 1,189
  • [GO0FY] GO0FY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View Postundutchable80, on 17 December 2019 - 12:49 PM, said:

Surprised no mention of the UK non-turreted TD line. AT2, AT8, AT7 and AT15 are all considered playable?

 

Out of those AT-15 would be the only one I'd consider bad, rest of the tanks either work really good or really bad depending on map and MM. 

AT 7 is a god damn roadblock at the right position.


Edited by Warzey, 17 December 2019 - 01:53 PM.


PowJay #34 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:53 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 41314 battles
  • 5,831
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

View Postundutchable80, on 17 December 2019 - 12:49 PM, said:

Surprised no mention of the UK non-turreted TD line. AT2, AT8, AT7 and AT15 are all considered playable?

Poor mobility and great big cupola lumps are the reason I've never continued past the AT2, even though I didn't do too badly with it, and with TDs being my main vehicle type. 

 

I did see a high tier TD (VIII or IX) turning rapidly when engaged at close range. I was amazed. I asked the player after battle how he did it. It was helped by a highly-trained crew and (possibly) food, but I can't remember about the food.



Warzey #35 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:55 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 60957 battles
  • 1,189
  • [GO0FY] GO0FY
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostPowJay, on 17 December 2019 - 12:53 PM, said:

Poor mobility and great big cupola lumps are the reason I've never continued past the AT2, even though I didn't do too badly with it, and with TDs being my main vehicle type. 

 

I did see a high tier TD (VIII or IX) turning rapidly when engaged at close range. I was amazed. I asked the player after battle how he did it. It was helped by a highly-trained crew and (possibly) food, but I can't remember about the food.

 

Trust me, Tortoise and T95 are hands down the best T9s TDs you can get. 

If you really want to push a flank there's nothing better than a +4000 DPM bunker on tracks.


Edited by Warzey, 17 December 2019 - 01:57 PM.


vonadnan #36 Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30523 battles
  • 208
  • [WGL-A] WGL-A
  • Member since:
    09-30-2012

I know u said tier 5+ but just for some ppl that mentioned Italian tier 4, that thing is insanely good, for me at least, with that high pen HE..

Like u said TVP and 65T are obvious ones (wonder why WG does not do anything about it after all the feedback from community for years now)

Special mention goes to Sweden TD-s, I'v made alt acc just for them, as a very aggressive player I knew lack of armor till higher tiers would be major setback for me, and it was so, I mean DPM on tier 6, with that "armor" is just..insult. Also Sturer was very, very painful.



Ogruls #37 Posted 17 December 2019 - 02:21 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 45863 battles
  • 61
  • [OLDG] OLDG
  • Member since:
    02-01-2015

View PostMiepie, on 17 December 2019 - 12:12 PM, said:

So many people hating on the low-tier Italian ones… I liked the P26/40. :unsure:

Yup cracking tank, they probably not loading HE, 70mm pen 131-219 dmg:)



Jumping_Turtle #38 Posted 17 December 2019 - 02:37 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 72092 battles
  • 8,416
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

CHN: T-34-2

CZE: TVP VTU

FRA: AMX AC mle.48

GER: Panther II

ITA: P.43 ter

JPN:  O-Ho

POL: 45TP

SWE: Emil II

UK: LHMTV

USA: T54E1

USSR: Obj. 430 Version II



Dava_117 #39 Posted 17 December 2019 - 02:47 PM

    Major General

  • Moderator
  • 23485 battles
  • 5,949
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 17 December 2019 - 11:49 AM, said:

USSR: KV-4

 

How? In the same line there is the KV-3! How can a tank with good armour and a gun with really high penetration factor being worst than the KV-3 that has T-150 armour layout with a worst turret?



kaneloon #40 Posted 17 December 2019 - 02:58 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 31718 battles
  • 4,172
  • [RHIN0] RHIN0
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011
Meeting tiers X probably ... :(
13:59 Added after 1 minute
Plus high and slow. Difficult to play if you don't master sidescrap.





Also tagged with Blueprints

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users