Jump to content


Map Exclusion needs to be fixed


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

Unforgiving_Destiny #1 Posted 29 December 2019 - 04:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 50011 battles
  • 515
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011
I put ghost town in blacklist and i still get it because i have encounter turned on ? WTF is this logic ? a map is the same in any gamemode if you block it you should not get it. Why is this not fixed yet after this much time ?

Edited by Unforgiving_Destiny, 29 December 2019 - 04:41 PM.


Homer_J #2 Posted 29 December 2019 - 05:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 33644 battles
  • 37,599
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

Encounter and standard mode use different maps as far as the game is concerned.

 

Perhaps they could allow you to block them as two separate maps but I guess they had reasons not to, possibly they thought it would confuse people.



_Signal_ #3 Posted 29 December 2019 - 05:50 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 47892 battles
  • 6,625
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011

View PostUnforgiving_Destiny, on 29 December 2019 - 03:40 PM, said:

I put ghost town in blacklist and i still get it because i have encounter turned on ? WTF is this logic ? a map is the same in any gamemode if you block it you should not get it. Why is this not fixed yet after this much time ?

It isn't fixed because it isn't broken, Standard Battles are different from encounter  or assault. You get to block two maps in Standard Battles. Easy way to block it is to exclude the other two modes. Might not be the answer your after but it's one that fixes your problem.



Desyatnik_Pansy #4 Posted 29 December 2019 - 06:23 PM

    Bartender

  • Moderator
  • 19207 battles
  • 27,412
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View PostSignal11th, on 29 December 2019 - 04:50 PM, said:

It isn't fixed because it isn't broken, Standard Battles are different from encounter  or assault. You get to block two maps in Standard Battles. Easy way to block it is to exclude the other two modes. Might not be the answer your after but it's one that fixes your problem.

 

Unfortunately so. It's the reason why I try to only pick and ban maps that don't have Encounter variants (don't play Assault atleast, so don't have to worry about those maps).



crnakoza #5 Posted 29 December 2019 - 06:51 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 61871 battles
  • 2,072
  • Member since:
    11-03-2014

View PostUnforgiving_Destiny, on 29 December 2019 - 04:40 PM, said:

Why is this not fixed yet after this much time ?

 

Because there is nothing to fix, it is intended to work that way.



Ratriq #6 Posted 29 December 2019 - 09:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6570 battles
  • 615
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-07-2013
Bug or feature, whatever you'd like to call it but I agree with OP on this.

You exclude a map cause you don't like the map, not the gamemode, but the map.

kaneloon #7 Posted 29 December 2019 - 09:28 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32273 battles
  • 4,279
  • [RHIN0] RHIN0
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

Same here, plus the exclusion not working at low tiers is annoying.

I banned Himmelsdorf, still had to play it for the other battle mode, and had it 4 times in 6 battles I played low tiers ...



crnakoza #8 Posted 29 December 2019 - 10:49 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 61871 battles
  • 2,072
  • Member since:
    11-03-2014

View PostRatriq, on 29 December 2019 - 09:13 PM, said:

You exclude a map cause you don't like the map, not the gamemode, but the map.

 

Maps, depending on gamemode play very differently. So why would you necessarily want to exclude, say, murovanka on encounter if you excluded it on standard? Because you hate the forest? You don't exclude the map because of the map, rather you do it because of how a given map is being played.



Balc0ra #9 Posted 29 December 2019 - 11:06 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 76397 battles
  • 22,415
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
In the patch notes when this was first added. They did state it's far from final. As with getting other modes pr map to be added. But it's not high on their list for that team.... for once.

Bordhaw #10 Posted 29 December 2019 - 11:11 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 16078 battles
  • 5,348
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

Block Quote

49788 battles

 

Heads up to all members. Posts like this are non-constructive, add nothing to the thread, and upset the little furry creatures from Alpha Centauri.

 


Edited by unhappy_bunny, 29 December 2019 - 11:30 PM.
General notice to all players


Unforgiving_Destiny #11 Posted 30 December 2019 - 03:04 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 50011 battles
  • 515
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostSignal11th, on 29 December 2019 - 05:50 PM, said:

It isn't fixed because it isn't broken, Standard Battles are different from encounter  or assault. You get to block two maps in Standard Battles. Easy way to block it is to exclude the other two modes. Might not be the answer your after but it's one that fixes your problem.

himmelsdorf is himmelsdorf it does not matter if it is standard or encounter or even assault (which it does not have), when i ban a map it is not because i don't like where bases are located on that map but because map design is super bad on that one (ghost town and this new proveli or whatever it is called are the best examples) and i think a lot of people also do ban maps for the same reason and that they just don't ban a map cause they don't like standard and like encounter.

02:08 Added after 4 minute

View Postcrnakoza, on 29 December 2019 - 10:49 PM, said:

 

Maps, depending on gamemode play very differently. So why would you necessarily want to exclude, say, murovanka on encounter if you excluded it on standard? Because you hate the forest? You don't exclude the map because of the map, rather you do it because of how a given map is being played.

cause maps like ghost town is crapregardless of encounter or assault or standard which is actually funny a map this craphas all 3 modes i don't want to play that map in ANY game mode but i enjoy siegfriedlinie assault and encounter so why should i be forced to turn the other game modes off cause there is 2 trash maps and they are in my rotation cause of encounter and assault ?



Solstad1069 #12 Posted 30 December 2019 - 11:05 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 46170 battles
  • 3,747
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013

View Postkaneloon, on 29 December 2019 - 09:28 PM, said:

Same here, plus the exclusion not working at low tiers is annoying.

I banned Himmelsdorf, still had to play it for the other battle mode, and had it 4 times in 6 battles I played low tiers ...

 

On low tiers there are like 3 maps in TOTAL to play and 1 of them is Himmelsdorf so not very smart to ban that one.

10:07 Added after 1 minute

View PostUnforgiving_Destiny, on 30 December 2019 - 03:04 AM, said:

 

cause maps like ghost town is crapregardless of encounter or assault or standard which is actually funny a map this craphas all 3 modes i don't want to play that map in ANY game mode but i enjoy siegfriedlinie assault and encounter so why should i be forced to turn the other game modes off cause there is 2 trash maps and they are in my rotation cause of encounter and assault ?

 

Agree Ghost Town is not a very good map, but its way better than Paris, Minsk and Provins. 



Hammerhead20 #13 Posted 30 December 2019 - 11:23 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 31124 battles
  • 2,282
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

Map "exclusion" need to gives us an option to "block" more maps...

 

Now you can only remove 2 of them.

 

This is a joke...



LethalWalou #14 Posted 30 December 2019 - 11:25 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 34832 battles
  • 2,515
  • [OISPA] OISPA
  • Member since:
    09-17-2012

View PostHammerhead20, on 30 December 2019 - 10:23 AM, said:

Map "exclusion" need to gives us an option to "block" more maps...

 

Now you can only remove 2 of them.

 

This is a joke...

 

Have you thought about the downsides of that regarding queue times and map rotation? Doubt it. Most likely we'll get a third one to block as they said they were looking into it. There would be no point to give more than that.



kaneloon #15 Posted 30 December 2019 - 11:33 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32273 battles
  • 4,279
  • [RHIN0] RHIN0
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

One map is enough imo, but in all the mods.

 

If you let people ban 3 or 4 maps they will do it accordingly to the tank they play : arty session without towns, super heavy session without open maps, ...



Ratriq #16 Posted 30 December 2019 - 01:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 6570 battles
  • 615
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-07-2013

View PostSolstad1069, on 30 December 2019 - 10:05 AM, said:

Agree Ghost Town is not a very good map, but its way better than Paris, Minsk and Provins. 

I actually enjoy playing Ghost town, Paris and Minsk, Ghost town, if it's in the right gamemode, can actually be one of my favourite maps and Minsk is just plainly one of my favourites. :hiding:



NaraduCZ #17 Posted 17 March 2020 - 05:22 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24821 battles
  • 24
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015
OK Wargamming, get your stupid map exclusion working! I've just downgraded to tier two just to get mastery on one of the arties. I excluded Himmelsdorf, cos I cant do a thing in it. And suprisingly, all I'm getting is Himmelsdorf! I don't want to hear things like it only works when I raise my left leg, right arm and there is sunny weather outside. When I exclude a map, I expect to be excluded no matter the tier nor other circumstances.

Denton_0451 #18 Posted 17 March 2020 - 05:26 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27144 battles
  • 1,869
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011

View PostNaraduCZ, on 17 March 2020 - 05:22 PM, said:

OK Wargamming, get your stupid map exclusion working! I've just downgraded to tier two just to get mastery on one of the arties. I excluded Himmelsdorf, cos I cant do a thing in it. And suprisingly, all I'm getting is Himmelsdorf! I don't want to hear things like it only works when I raise my left leg, right arm and there is sunny weather outside. When I exclude a map, I expect to be excluded no matter the tier nor other circumstances.


Will only work when playing Tier IV vehicles or higher



barison1 #19 Posted 17 March 2020 - 05:38 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 45964 battles
  • 2,712
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    01-14-2012

View PostHammerhead20, on 30 December 2019 - 11:23 AM, said:

Map "exclusion" need to gives us an option to "block" more maps...

 

Now you can only remove 2 of them.

 

This is a joke...

be glad there is an option to block 1-2 maps

 

on every single thing given out people complain REEEEEEE WHY NOT MOOOOAAR

with blueprints people complain; why cant i convert, why do i not get more, why does 1 bp not give more xp discount

with cred fault (prem acc) people complain why the cap is at 750k and not like 2mil

and more examples like that

 

it might aswell been better if those options were never there to begin with so people cant complain about it, people only want more of said thing when its added

 

 



LethalWalou #20 Posted 17 March 2020 - 05:56 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 34832 battles
  • 2,515
  • [OISPA] OISPA
  • Member since:
    09-17-2012

View Postbarison1, on 17 March 2020 - 04:38 PM, said:

be glad there is an option to block 1-2 maps

 

on every single thing given out people complain REEEEEEE WHY NOT MOOOOAAR

with blueprints people complain; why cant i convert, why do i not get more, why does 1 bp not give more xp discount

with cred fault (prem acc) people complain why the cap is at 750k and not like 2mil

and more examples like that

 

it might aswell been better if those options were never there to begin with so people cant complain about it, people only want more of said thing when its added

 

And don't forget we also have the opposite people too who complain about too many BPs given out, or too many reserves etc. Whatever they do, they will be hated on with these kind of things.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users