Jump to content


The new worst tier 10 heavy tank of 2020

Tier 10 heavies Tank parameter improvements 113 E100 IS4 AMX M4 54 T110E5

  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

Poll: Worst tier 10 heavy tank that needs buffing or replacing in 2020 (156 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Which one needs buffing or replacing?

  1. 113 (13 votes [8.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

  2. IS4 (50 votes [32.05%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.05%

  3. E100 (38 votes [24.36%])

    Percentage of vote: 24.36%

  4. T110E5 (43 votes [27.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.56%

  5. AMX M4 54 (12 votes [7.69%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.69%

Vote Hide poll

Schepel #21 Posted 02 January 2020 - 09:19 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 67190 battles
  • 3,937
  • Member since:
    05-13-2013

View Postantwerp_fighter, on 02 January 2020 - 01:55 AM, said:

Hope WG buff all of them...I will pick up IS-4...

IS-4: dpm and gun handling, maybe also remove the weak point on the head like IS-3

E-100: cheek armor

E5: make that cupola smaller.. or thicker

AMX M4 45 and 113... no idea...

 

 

 

These tanks are actually fine as they are. The solution isn't to keep buffing everything, some tanks need (small!) nerfs. Mostly, premium ammo needs to be nerfed by around 5-10%. The fact that you can pen an unangled E100 turret isn't a problem: there is no reason heavy tanks should be invulnerable. Same deal with the E5: play that tank properly and that cuppola is a reasonable weakspot. People just sit still, hull up and expect to get away with that sort of stupidity. You have to ask if that is what you want from a game: utterly idiot proof tanks.

 

IMHO:

 

- Decrease pen (especially on HEAT)

- Increase accuracy (primarily: shot dispersion)

- All armoured tanks need to have some kind of frontal weakspot OR sufficient crap mobility that flanking them is a reasonably prospect even in a corridor.

 

This is, again IMHO, how you reward skill rather than force the use of premium ammo without the need to engage so much as half a brain cell.



s3thus #22 Posted 02 January 2020 - 10:01 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22079 battles
  • 481
  • Member since:
    11-18-2013
The T95/FV4201 Chieftain is missing from the list. That tank really needs a buff.

BR33K1_PAWAH #23 Posted 02 January 2020 - 11:05 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 8158 battles
  • 2,087
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

AMX 13 105

Manticore

Panhard EBR 105

Rheinmetall Panzerwagen

T-100LT

WZ-132-1

XM551 Sheridan


Edited by BR33K1_PAWAH, 02 January 2020 - 11:06 AM.


Cobra6 #24 Posted 02 January 2020 - 11:28 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16613 battles
  • 18,252
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

IS-4 without a shadow of a doubt, there seem to be a ton of people voting for the T110E5 but they seem to forget that tank is actually rather playable still and has good offensive capabilities unlike the IS-4 with it's potato canon.

 

Cobra 6



JOSEBA_PRIME #25 Posted 02 January 2020 - 12:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24143 battles
  • 893
  • [FOXUS] FOXUS
  • Member since:
    01-22-2017

113 is a very good tank. 5A and 430u are improved versions of this tank, but without comparing with any other tank 113 is more than fine.

 

Is-4 and e5 should receive a buff, but I am afraid Is-4 will become mega OP after the buff, because It is a soviet tank after all.



snowlywhite #26 Posted 02 January 2020 - 04:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28988 battles
  • 754
  • Member since:
    01-05-2018

and which soviet heavies are so great? Is4 is... beyond junk, 705 is just junk. Is7 is fine(need to have some newbie friendly tanks in game anyway), 277 is good, 260 is good after buffs.

 

the only op soviet heavy is 279 which was buffed for... dunno, ask WG why they buffed it :P



tajj7 #27 Posted 02 January 2020 - 07:11 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29332 battles
  • 17,547
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

Posted Image

 

^ WR curves for all of them over the last year.

 

Upper end of the curves for above 62% players looks a bit odd but I am presuming that is a lack of data.  It's pretty close, but it seems for most players under about 54-55% overall WR the worst off are the E5, 113 and M4 54, the E100 and IS4 clearly being more forgiving. 

 

For better players the 113 and E5 pick up a little, whilst the M4 54 remains throughly mediocre even for the best players.

 

Based on that it would be the french tank as the worst peformer, followed by the E5 and 113. 

 

E100 is a little underpowered but I'd say its probably one of the consistently badly used tanks in the game and 750 alpha + 2700 HP and some usable armour always gives it some value. 


Edited by tajj7, 02 January 2020 - 07:11 PM.


snowlywhite #28 Posted 02 January 2020 - 08:19 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28988 battles
  • 754
  • Member since:
    01-05-2018

60%+ really looks all over the place =)))

 

but then, it's not very important given there are probably under 2% players there. And doubt that many of them play any of those 5 :P

 

surprised about is4. Guess it's good enough at buying time; because it's definitely not very good at dishing dmg.


Edited by snowlywhite, 02 January 2020 - 08:19 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users