Jump to content


Permanent ranked battles.

bots ranked games permanent

  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

Poll: Permanent ranked games (45 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Would you like WG to implement ranked/skill base gameplay ?

  1. yes (17 votes [37.78%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 37.78%

  2. no (27 votes [60.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 60.00%

  3. other (explain in comments) (1 vote [2.22%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.22%

Vote Hide poll

Sandal #1 Posted 16 February 2020 - 04:50 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 47510 battles
  • 104
  • [SPESH] SPESH
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011
What do you think about permanent ranked battles ? I mean for example players with up to 1000 wn8/personal score ( or whatever statistic would be better here ) play games only between each other and players with more than 1000 play with themself. I was playing today and my eyes are bleeding. People with 40 000 - 90 000 games and 300 wn8. camping on spawn or behind arty.  It used to be problem on low tiers but these bots progress and now they are playing tiers 8+    Like this guy on screenshots 20 000 games ( have more examples of ppl with 60 000+ games like him ). He was afking in base first 5 minutes of the game just to wake up and press r twice and die without doing anything. You would expect that after 20 000 games you will have a small idea of how to play and what to do. 

Attached Files

  • Attached File   shot_012.jpg   236.46K
  • Attached File   shot_011.jpg   174.87K


Steeleye_Spam #2 Posted 16 February 2020 - 05:07 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 37205 battles
  • 439
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-31-2014
This suggestion has been round the houses dozens of times on the forum. How about check out the previous threads and save everyone's time. Oh, and NO.

Sandal #3 Posted 16 February 2020 - 05:27 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 47510 battles
  • 104
  • [SPESH] SPESH
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011

View PostSteeleye_Spam, on 16 February 2020 - 05:07 PM, said:

This suggestion has been round the houses dozens of times on the forum. How about check out the previous threads and save everyone's time. Oh, and NO.

Sorry, i dont really sit here as I'm half blind and reading this forum is on the bottom of my list. :P   Im just coming here from time to time to see if anything changed or to cry a bit :> 

 



Tealo #4 Posted 16 February 2020 - 07:44 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45835 battles
  • 476
  • [RIFF] RIFF
  • Member since:
    04-26-2012
Maybe occasionally as a event like 7vs7 team clash. Come to think of it :ohmy: ranked battles (league system) 7v7 might actually work better. 

StronkiTonki #5 Posted 16 February 2020 - 08:28 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Clan Commander
  • 35276 battles
  • 1,239
  • [T0AST] T0AST
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

Nothing except randoms should be permanent.

Any other gamemode should be temporary, otherwise the playerbase will start splitting up, only playing one specific gamemode.



splash_time #6 Posted 16 February 2020 - 08:52 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15611 battles
  • 1,455
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-20-2018

No, not good idea mate. Because if it happens, then we'll have threads about people with low stats complaining about themselves not having good battles (nobody performs above average) and they'll mostly have draws or something like that.

 

Also consider the queue time. :)



ZlatanArKung #7 Posted 16 February 2020 - 09:02 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1537 battles
  • 5,555
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
An optional skillbased mode, why not.
20:04 Added after 1 minute

View PostStronkiTonki, on 16 February 2020 - 08:28 PM, said:

Nothing except randoms should be permanent.

Any other gamemode should be temporary, otherwise the playerbase will start splitting up, only playing one specific gamemode.

 

Why?

 

Creating other permanent modes could make a new kind of players interested and actually increase player numbers. 

20:05 Added after 2 minute

View Postsplash_time, on 16 February 2020 - 08:52 PM, said:

No, not good idea mate. Because if it happens, then we'll have threads about people with low stats complaining about themselves not having good battles (nobody performs above average) and they'll mostly have draws or something like that.

 

Also consider the queue time. :)

Why is it bad that bad players whine? 

 

 

As for queue times, this shouldn't be an issue at all, since NA server works with waaaay less players. 



splash_time #8 Posted 16 February 2020 - 09:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15611 battles
  • 1,455
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-20-2018

View PostZlatanArKung, on 16 February 2020 - 11:02 PM, said:

Why is it bad that bad players whine? 

 

 

As for queue times, this shouldn't be an issue at all, since NA server works with waaaay less players. 

 

Okay then, wait till WG make it for you. :popcorn:

 

Gl! 



Sandal #9 Posted 16 February 2020 - 09:21 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 47510 battles
  • 104
  • [SPESH] SPESH
  • Member since:
    04-23-2011

View Postsplash_time, on 16 February 2020 - 08:52 PM, said:

No, not good idea mate. Because if it happens, then we'll have threads about people with low stats complaining about themselves not having good battles (nobody performs above average) and they'll mostly have draws or something like that.

 

Also consider the queue time. :)

There are already bots in game so the que is not a problem. Just check sometimes you have players with 80 - 90 000 games ~~500wn7 never in the clan and only random battles played. If you try to msg them not even one will msg you back. 

Attached Files

  • Attached File   shot_003.jpg   279.31K


splash_time #10 Posted 16 February 2020 - 09:52 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15611 battles
  • 1,455
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-20-2018

View PostSandal, on 16 February 2020 - 11:21 PM, said:

There are already bots in game so the que is not a problem. Just check sometimes you have players with 80 - 90 000 games ~~500wn7 never in the clan and only random battles played. If you try to msg them not even one will msg you back. 

 

Bots do exist in world of tanks, I'm not saying you're wrong, but only in T1 and T2 AFAIK.



NekoPuffer_PPP #11 Posted 16 February 2020 - 10:58 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36016 battles
  • 4,716
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

Ranked Battles once a month, lasting one week.

 

Yay or nay?



Balc0ra #12 Posted 16 February 2020 - 11:11 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 76387 battles
  • 22,402
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

For randoms? Won't happen. WG have said time and time again that randoms are called randoms for a reason. But... as it's own separate mode? Well, then it would be tier limited. And if there are no rewards for playing it. Most would lose interest regardless of WN8 over time.

 

Then again, you hate 300 WN8 players. 3000 WN8 players hate 1000 WN8 players. So splitting it two would just... make more of these topics I suspect. Point is, as ranked has proved even as a limited mode. Not gonna please everyone regardless. 



DuncaN_101 #13 Posted 16 February 2020 - 11:27 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 57334 battles
  • 3,344
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
It really doesn't matter to me since I don't play the mode.

I also don't see a point of people try harding even more then normal. So I don't think it's a good idea but then again don't really care either way

SlyMeerkat #14 Posted 16 February 2020 - 11:50 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 19447 battles
  • 3,592
  • [-RLD-] -RLD-
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
God no

Element6 #15 Posted 16 February 2020 - 11:59 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33087 battles
  • 11,853
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

View PostZlatanArKung, on 16 February 2020 - 09:02 PM, said:

Why?

 

Creating other permanent modes could make a new kind of players interested and actually increase player numbers. 

There is probably a reason they turned Grand Battles off during 7 vs. 7...

 



rhytmiser #16 Posted 17 February 2020 - 12:25 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15763 battles
  • 19
  • [AKORP] AKORP
  • Member since:
    02-27-2012

Guess u dont notice this when the bot is in enemy team right? u like it :)) same as playing with enemy that has like over 10k battles in a tank that kills half a team low tier is so funny ,or playing 8/10 battles in high tier, or tanks that get in a NO win zone daily no matter dmg or how u play ... u looose, i can see if i win or loose at start when i ding crit light 0 armor tanks , ghost shells ,armor useless,and Kapow 5 team tanks dead in first minute.

No balance ,stop playing a few days and get in winning team like magic :)) start losing quit game again, the more u play the more this game screws u.



mjs_89 #17 Posted 17 February 2020 - 12:45 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10204 battles
  • 1,117
  • [95137] 95137
  • Member since:
    08-16-2017
I'd much prefer a regular 7v7 gamemode for tier 10, like team clash. That was a really great event and the 7v7 games were so much more fun than randoms or ranked.

Homer_J #18 Posted 17 February 2020 - 02:57 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 33644 battles
  • 37,589
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

Permanent tryhard mode for permanent tryhards.  Why not.

 

I suspect it won't be that popular though.  Ranked only had people playing it for the rewards.



tajj7 #19 Posted 17 February 2020 - 09:58 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29299 battles
  • 17,533
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View Postmjs_89, on 16 February 2020 - 11:45 PM, said:

I'd much prefer a regular 7v7 gamemode for tier 10, like team clash. That was a really great event and the 7v7 games were so much more fun than randoms or ranked.

 

Yeh much rather this.

 

Though I would be interested to see a SBMM mode or something and then see all the whines come out again when it doesn't solve the problems people always claim it would. 



StronkiTonki #20 Posted 17 February 2020 - 07:55 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Clan Commander
  • 35276 battles
  • 1,239
  • [T0AST] T0AST
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

View PostZlatanArKung, on 16 February 2020 - 08:02 PM, said:

Why?

 

Creating other permanent modes could make a new kind of players interested and actually increase player numbers. 

 

I literally gave an argument explaining why, in my post that you quoted.

Please read it again.







Also tagged with bots, ranked games, permanent

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users