Jump to content


wot is dead

#unfair

  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

_CrnaMamba_ #1 Posted 18 February 2020 - 10:48 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19126 battles
  • 3
  • [_PKB-] _PKB-
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012
it is very unbalanced between regular players and premium

BravelyRanAway #2 Posted 18 February 2020 - 10:53 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27524 battles
  • 15,063
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

I can hear poor people!

(PS:- Your're wrong)



_Corvus_Corax #3 Posted 18 February 2020 - 10:58 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 37524 battles
  • 2,914
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    11-10-2012
How so, they have access to the same tanks, the same ammo, the same equipment and so on. Premium account holders repair their tanks cheaper and gain more experience per game. Where is the unbalance in battle.

Spartan_93 #4 Posted 18 February 2020 - 11:04 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26519 battles
  • 980
  • [-IDC-] -IDC-
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

Yes, you're right. Here is the proof:

 

My Mathilda IV (Tier 5 premium tank) is very likely to lose a 1 vs. 1 against a KV-1 (Tier 5 regular tank). Because it have only 86mm penetration and KV-1 as a regular tank have strong armor. Completly unbalanced.



Overlord93 #5 Posted 18 February 2020 - 11:48 AM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 13738 battles
  • 249
  • [CROFT] CROFT
  • Member since:
    01-08-2011

About balance, remember back in the old days when tier 5 and 10 were in the same match and KV-2 was tier 5 and you could lob derp shells at a Maus, but also you had to go against IS-7 in your Panzer IV and they would tell you learn to play, go scout <ou scrub make it work... Nowdays if a tank has 5% different stat everyone goes mad like it's the end of the world. People will always complain about balance. You can ether have balance or variety, can't have both.



Captain_Kremen0 #6 Posted 18 February 2020 - 04:02 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 44960 battles
  • 3,153
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011
Its so unfair that the game is biased. I mean why should good players beat bad players all the time!

Miepie #7 Posted 18 February 2020 - 04:45 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8328 battles
  • 4,372
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018

View PostCaptain_Kremen0, on 18 February 2020 - 04:02 PM, said:

why should good players beat bad players all the time!

They don't. :popcorn:



_SpartanWarrior_ #8 Posted 18 February 2020 - 08:21 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42112 battles
  • 964
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013
Its not dead,its SLOWLY dying.

xx984 #9 Posted 18 February 2020 - 08:26 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 72738 battles
  • 4,466
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 18 February 2020 - 07:21 PM, said:

Its not dead,its SLOWLY dying.

like every old game.



_SpartanWarrior_ #10 Posted 19 February 2020 - 12:04 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42112 battles
  • 964
  • [BLOJ] BLOJ
  • Member since:
    01-09-2013

View Postxx984, on 18 February 2020 - 01:26 PM, said:

like every old game.

Those who say that its dead-they are wrong

Those who say that its perfect-they are wrong



Captain_Kremen0 #11 Posted 19 February 2020 - 12:47 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 44960 battles
  • 3,153
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    06-04-2011

View PostMiepie, on 18 February 2020 - 03:45 PM, said:

They don't. :popcorn:

 

Replay or it didn't happen!



unhappy__bunny #12 Posted 19 February 2020 - 12:59 PM

    Major General

  • Moderator
  • 23400 battles
  • 5,512
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View Post_SpartanWarrior_, on 18 February 2020 - 11:04 PM, said:

Those who say that its dead-they are wrong

Those who say that its perfect-they are wrong


I agree with both statements, but while many spout the first I have yet to see anyone claim the second.



Miepie #13 Posted 19 February 2020 - 03:26 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8328 battles
  • 4,372
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018

View PostCaptain_Kremen0, on 19 February 2020 - 12:47 PM, said:

 

Replay or it didn't happen!

Unicums stole my replay to pretend it was them that won the match! :ohmy:



mpf1959 #14 Posted 20 February 2020 - 04:01 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 47020 battles
  • 4,863
  • [DRATT] DRATT
  • Member since:
    10-29-2017

wot is dead

 



_CrnaMamba_ #15 Posted 20 February 2020 - 09:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19126 battles
  • 3
  • [_PKB-] _PKB-
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 18 February 2020 - 10:53 AM, said:

I can hear poor people!

(PS:- Your're wrong)

i just dont spend money on games,i earn my money not my father,you are smart you will get it :D 

 

is6 tier 8 can pen my t110e4 in turret,Not in the weak part,in front side,so he only can with premium amo,and that premium amo make this game bad,not regular premium acc,you have only extra credits and thats ok,not other premium tanks,only premium amo

 

 



BravelyRanAway #16 Posted 20 February 2020 - 09:42 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27524 battles
  • 15,063
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View Post_CrnaMamba_, on 20 February 2020 - 08:36 PM, said:

i just dont spend money on games,i earn my money not my father,

Great! a sponger that complains. 

Why bring your daddy into this?



Balc0ra #17 Posted 21 February 2020 - 07:36 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 83881 battles
  • 26,972
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

View Post_CrnaMamba_, on 18 February 2020 - 10:48 AM, said:

it is very unbalanced between regular players and premium

 

Then it's been dead for almost a decade. As we have seen topics like that since the game came.

 

View PostSpartan_93, on 18 February 2020 - 11:04 AM, said:

Yes, you're right. Here is the proof:

 

My Mathilda IV (Tier 5 premium tank) is very likely to lose a 1 vs. 1 against a KV-1 (Tier 5 regular tank). Because it have only 86mm penetration and KV-1 as a regular tank have strong armor. Completly unbalanced.

 

It's why I never attack them head-on in mine. I track them and farm their rear end. It's carried a fair few games, even after I run out of the amazing 102mm gold pen.


Edited by Balc0ra, 21 February 2020 - 07:39 PM.


lord_chipmonk #18 Posted 28 January 2021 - 09:08 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 38413 battles
  • 12,730
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View Post_CrnaMamba_, on 20 February 2020 - 09:36 PM, said:

is6 tier 8 can pen my t110e4 in turret,Not in the weak part,in front side,so he only can with premium amo,and that premium amo make this game bad,not regular premium acc,you have only extra credits and thats ok,not other premium tanks,only premium amo

 

Wait a moment. IS-6? The IS-6 gets limited matchmaking because the pen on its gun sucks for a tier 8 heavy. So, unless the player is a wombat and platoons up with a regular tier 8, he will never meet a T110E4. Even if he does do that, with APCR he gets a might 225 pen. Which is about the same most tier 8 heavies get on their regular AP ammo. So, this isn't an issue at all of premium content vs regular content. This is an issue of a tier 8 penning you frontally (getting lucky btw, he needed a high pen roll for that to happen) and you having a hissy fit. Deal with it. If you're struggling against an IS-6 in your T110E4, you have rather more pronounced gameplay issues to deal with. 



Nishi_Kinuyo #19 Posted 28 January 2021 - 05:38 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 12373 battles
  • 8,483
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

Almost a year later and the game is still going.

Guess it was fake news after all.



BR33K1_PAWAH #20 Posted 28 January 2021 - 07:35 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 14668 battles
  • 4,482
  • [AAV] AAV
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View PostNishi_Kinuyo, on 28 January 2021 - 07:38 PM, said:

Almost a year later and the game is still going.

Guess it was fake news after all.

Or we all stuck in limbo :ohmy:






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users