Jump to content


Bat.-Chat/ERC-90 ?

Bourrasque

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

WindSplitter1 #1 Posted 19 February 2020 - 08:57 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20806 battles
  • 3,674
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

It looks a lot like the non-historical EBR 105 turret was mated to the B-C 12t chassis and called a Medium.

 

Is this vehicle any historical or am I missing something? Not that I mind historical accuracy. But I like knowing the background. :)



xx984 #2 Posted 19 February 2020 - 08:58 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 67363 battles
  • 3,918
  • [72861] 72861
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013

The tank is essentially this but with BC 12 T and EBR 105

 



8126Jakobsson #3 Posted 19 February 2020 - 09:07 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 84712 battles
  • 6,236
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

I call it Burlesque. 

Burlesque derives from the Italian word Burlesco which in turn derives from the word Burla - a joke, ridicule or mockery. 

But mostly it just rolls better off the tongue. And it might make you think of women with interesting garments.



WindSplitter1 #4 Posted 19 February 2020 - 09:08 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 20806 battles
  • 3,674
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View Post8126Jakobsson, on 19 February 2020 - 08:07 PM, said:

I call it Burlesque. 

Burlesque derives from the Italian word Burlesco which in turn derives from the word Burla - a joke, ridicule or mockery. 

But mostly it just rolls better off the tongue. And it might make you think of women with interesting garments.

 

"Burla" is a Portuguese word for exactly that.

 

Can't understand the 20s reload btw


Edited by WindSplitter1, 19 February 2020 - 09:10 PM.


_Potato_from_Poland #5 Posted 20 February 2020 - 05:47 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 33100 battles
  • 118
  • [FIPZD] FIPZD
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View PostWindSplitter1, on 19 February 2020 - 08:08 PM, said:

 

"Burla" is a Portuguese word for exactly that.

 

Can't understand the 20s reload btw

 

Is that reloadtime too long or too small? What would you suggest for reload time?



Spurtung #6 Posted 20 February 2020 - 05:51 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 78574 battles
  • 7,729
  • [WG_PT] WG_PT
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostWindSplitter1, on 19 February 2020 - 08:08 PM, said:

"Burla" is a Portuguese word for exactly that.

 

It usually means a swindle when it's used, though.



24doom24 #7 Posted 20 February 2020 - 03:08 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9175 battles
  • 1,186
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View Post_Potato_from_Poland, on 20 February 2020 - 04:47 AM, said:

 

Is that reloadtime too long or too small? What would you suggest for reload time?

It goes down to 16.88s with BIA and vents for a dpm of 2288 which isn't tragic in any way but nothing special either. What really sucks about this tank is the aim time, My 183 aims faster and is more accurate:D



Oldewolfe #8 Posted 20 February 2020 - 05:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 535 battles
  • 523
  • Member since:
    10-22-2017

I'll be Getting it, been wanting it since they brought the Topic Up on the Armored Patrol....     I like Pairing my Tech Tree Keepers to a Premium for Training and Double Dipping the x2's and the likes....       Fresh Crews I can run thru 3 or More that way also and Ramp Up their Skill Progression....

 

The Tier 9 Reward for Frontline/Steel Hunter, as much as I want to get that, my Schedule doesn't Allow for it....     Between Working and the Commute between 1 to 2hrs, it doesn't leave alotta Time for anything this Dedicated or Demanding....



_Potato_from_Poland #9 Posted 20 February 2020 - 06:14 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 33100 battles
  • 118
  • [FIPZD] FIPZD
  • Member since:
    08-22-2011

View Post24doom24, on 20 February 2020 - 02:08 PM, said:

It goes down to 16.88s with BIA and vents for a dpm of 2288 which isn't tragic in any way but nothing special either. What really sucks about this tank is the aim time, My 183 aims faster and is more accurate:D

Aimtime is irrelevant stat, as is accuracy. Hidden gun stats matter The most.



24doom24 #10 Posted 20 February 2020 - 08:53 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9175 battles
  • 1,186
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View Post_Potato_from_Poland, on 20 February 2020 - 05:14 PM, said:

Aimtime is irrelevant stat, as is accuracy. Hidden gun stats matter The most.

Not really lol. There is a huge difference between 0.43 accuracy and 0.28 accuracy. As well as a huge difference between 3.3 second aim time and 1.9 second. 


Edited by 24doom24, 20 February 2020 - 08:54 PM.


Desyatnik_Pansy #11 Posted 20 February 2020 - 09:27 PM

    Bartender

  • Moderator
  • 19207 battles
  • 27,391
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View Post24doom24, on 20 February 2020 - 07:53 PM, said:

Not really lol. There is a huge difference between 0.43 accuracy and 0.28 accuracy. As well as a huge difference between 3.3 second aim time and 1.9 second. 

 

Yeah, but having better softstats is pretty important. Take a tank with 2.5 Aimtime and 0.4 Accuracy, but 0.04 On all softstats vs. a tank with 1.7 Aimtime and 0.3 Accuracy but 0.20 On all softstats, under most circumstances the less accurate tank is arguably better because the reticle isn't blooming as much as it drives around or rotates the turret, so it won't have to sit through aiming as much. An example of this in practice is how my 703 II Generally feels much more comfortable than my E-75 TS Unless I'm sitting sniping at 300m.

 

You mentioned earlier the 183 Aiming faster and being more accurate, but I feel quite certain to say the Borrasque will be much more comfortable to play as with the ideal loadout (VStabs + Vents + BiA; note, 183 Doesn't get VStabs of course), you're looking at it:

3.21 Aimtime, 0.39 Accuracy, 0.07 On all softstats (BC)

3.12 Aimtime, 0.37 Accuracy, 0.24/0.24/0.37 (183; tank moving/tank traverse/turret traverse)

 

Just saying.







Also tagged with Bourrasque

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users