Jump to content


Should the Obj. 279e, T95/FV4201 and other Reward/CW tanks be banned from Public games?


  • Please log in to reply
106 replies to this topic

TokiWartooth #1 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Clan Commander
  • 34812 battles
  • 199
  • [_SHC_] _SHC_
  • Member since:
    06-03-2011

As the title states, should those tanks be banned from Public games, ie do they provide to much of an unfair advantage vs the regular tech tree tanks?

Or should they be nerfed to be more in line with the regular tanks? (Looking at the fv and obj here).

 

What are your guys thoughts?

 



gunslingerXXX #2 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:32 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 14150 battles
  • 3,907
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
No

LethalWalou #3 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:34 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 34832 battles
  • 2,496
  • [OISPA] OISPA
  • Member since:
    09-17-2012

No.

I wouldn't oppose to them being removed from CW and RB though.



_cro_magnon #4 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:34 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 35016 battles
  • 3,011
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012
No. Nerfed though? Yes.

Private_Miros #5 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27111 battles
  • 10,511
  • [EMU87] EMU87
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011

Nope.

 

Though general tank rebalance should take place.



LethalWalou #6 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:39 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 34832 battles
  • 2,496
  • [OISPA] OISPA
  • Member since:
    09-17-2012

View Post_cro_magnon, on 08 March 2020 - 05:34 PM, said:

Nerfed though? Yes

 

And this ^^ too

Didn't notice the other question.



Jumping_TurtIe #7 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:40 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 6478 battles
  • 1,294
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-26-2015
No, they should just nerf them to tech tree tank levels

Spartan_93 #8 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24755 battles
  • 867
  • [-IDC-] -IDC-
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

And other reward tanks?

What unfair advantage have a StuG IV? So, be more specific what tank you mean and what you want to change, pls!

 

And no, in general you can play against every tank, you just need to be a little creativ and uses some non-standard tactics. That is the point I like in WoT, that you can beat every tank, sometimes it is easy and sometimes harder, but still possible.



Dava_117 #9 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:44 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Moderator
  • 23776 battles
  • 6,174
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014
No, having a tank and not being able to play it is sad. But WG should rebalance them instead. That would be enought. 

TokiWartooth #10 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:56 PM

    Corporal

  • Clan Commander
  • 34812 battles
  • 199
  • [_SHC_] _SHC_
  • Member since:
    06-03-2011

View PostSpartan_93, on 08 March 2020 - 07:44 PM, said:

And other reward tanks?

What unfair advantage have a StuG IV? So, be more specific what tank you mean and what you want to change, pls!

 

And no, in general you can play against every tank, you just need to be a little creativ and uses some non-standard tactics. That is the point I like in WoT, that you can beat every tank, sometimes it is easy and sometimes harder, but still possible.


I named those 2 tanks, but if you read the rest of the question it says other CW/Reward vehicles as well.

 



SpartA_1ah1 #11 Posted 08 March 2020 - 06:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26113 battles
  • 226
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Nay, leave my Obj. 279e and T95/FV4201 alone.

FrantisekBascovansky #12 Posted 08 March 2020 - 07:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39104 battles
  • 966
  • Member since:
    03-26-2018
Rebalance it or match with tier 10 only.

Nitro_Tank #13 Posted 08 March 2020 - 07:23 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7898 battles
  • 366
  • Member since:
    08-07-2011
Nerf them to crap, they had their time to dominate and its getting old really quick

NekoPuffer_PPP #14 Posted 08 March 2020 - 07:32 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36016 battles
  • 4,716
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View PostTokiWartooth, on 08 March 2020 - 06:56 PM, said:

I named those 2 tanks, but if you read the rest of the question it says other CW/Reward vehicles as well.

 

So the Obj. 260, T 55 A, T28 HTC, StuG IV, Excalibur and Chimera also bother you?

 

I think not.

 

What you really want is the Obj. 279e and T95/FV4201 nerfed. A lot of people can agree with you on that.

 

However...is a reward tank you worked hard for, and invested countless hours for, supposed to be worse, better, or on par with the rest of the tanks at its tier? I think it should be better. Otherwise, what's the point of getting it?



Nitro_Tank #15 Posted 08 March 2020 - 07:37 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7898 battles
  • 366
  • Member since:
    08-07-2011

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 08 March 2020 - 06:32 PM, said:

 

So the Obj. 260, T 55 A, T28 HTC, StuG IV, Excalibur and Chimera also bother you?

 

I think not.

 

What you really want is the Obj. 279e and T95/FV4201 nerfed. A lot of people can agree with you on that.

 

However...is a reward tank you worked hard for, and invested countless hours for, supposed to be worse, better, or on par with the rest of the tanks at its tier? I think it should be better. Otherwise, what's the point of getting it?

The point is: You got it and other people don't. They be like: this player worked hard for the tank, good for him! i hope one day i get it too

 

ofc this friendly admiration only works when tanks are balanced, if you want hostility in the world of tanks community then unbalanced reward tanks are the thing for you!



GustyOWindflap #16 Posted 08 March 2020 - 07:40 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 1943 battles
  • 93
  • Member since:
    12-21-2017
Put both in the tech tree and let Super Conqueror and IS4 be special tanks.

Spartan_93 #17 Posted 08 March 2020 - 07:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24755 battles
  • 867
  • [-IDC-] -IDC-
  • Member since:
    10-11-2012

View PostTokiWartooth, on 08 March 2020 - 05:56 PM, said:


I named those 2 tanks, but if you read the rest of the question it says other CW/Reward vehicles as well.

 

 

If you read your question again and combine it with the StuG IV (reward tank), you would notice, that you need to buff it to get it in line with tech tree tanks.

=> You ask the wrong question, if you ask for CW/reward tanks in general.

 

Because of that: No, reward tanks need buff to get in line with tech tree tanks.

 

Edit: unfair advantage? The game is about using unfair advantages: Light (wheeled) tanks vs. turretless TD; good armored tanks vs. low penetration tanks; arty/KV-2/FV183 (big HE shells) vs. good armored tanks; good camo ratings vs. viewrange tanks, playing as team (e.g. 2 tanks vs. 1 tank).

Every tank have his advantages, if you use them in the right way to counter enemy tanks, they become "unfair". Teamplay is unfair, too.


Edited by Spartan_93, 08 March 2020 - 07:51 PM.


Dava_117 #18 Posted 08 March 2020 - 07:46 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Moderator
  • 23776 battles
  • 6,174
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 08 March 2020 - 07:32 PM, said:

However...is a reward tank you worked hard for, and invested countless hours for, supposed to be worse, better, or on par with the rest of the tanks at its tier? I think it should be better. Otherwise, what's the point of getting it?

 

The point is getting something exclusive, not OP. Those tanks are made OP just because people would not rush to them if they were not. It's a wrong but easy way to attract people on game mode like CW or to throw credit away grinding 279e mission set, nothing more. 



moldovanvali #19 Posted 08 March 2020 - 07:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16047 battles
  • 40
  • Member since:
    11-10-2013

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 08 March 2020 - 08:32 PM, said:

 

So the Obj. 260, T 55 A, T28 HTC, StuG IV, Excalibur and Chimera also bother you?

 

I think not.

 

What you really want is the Obj. 279e and T95/FV4201 nerfed. A lot of people can agree with you on that.

 

However...is a reward tank you worked hard for, and invested countless hours for, supposed to be worse, better, or on par with the rest of the tanks at its tier? I think it should be better. Otherwise, what's the point of getting it?

Sure. Totally agree. 

Your conclusion is that the players that cannot afford to spend their life in the WOT garage should get stupidly hammered in tier 10 by OP tanks?

I admire people who worked hard and got it but I do not think they should have a competitive advantage for that.



BabukaHZ #20 Posted 08 March 2020 - 08:36 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 42745 battles
  • 55
  • Member since:
    03-27-2016

View PostTokiWartooth, on 08 March 2020 - 06:31 PM, said:

As the title states, should those tanks be banned from Public games, ie do they provide to much of an unfair advantage vs the regular tech tree tanks?

Or should they be nerfed to be more in line with the regular tanks? (Looking at the fv and obj here).

 

What are your guys thoughts?

 

No ban no nerf...ppl was work hard to get Obj. 279e, T95/FV4201 and now you want to nerf&ban them.

Please be oure guest ant work on this mission and get this tanks. Stop cry rivers.

This tanks are not given for free they are earned.... crybabies....

 

P.s. today i had a match. Himelsdorf map and enemy team has obj 279e. All HT lows went to hill, but suprise mother tracker :) obj 279e went to hill too :D






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users