Jump to content


How much would you pay for tier 8 premium WT auf E100 ?


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

Poll: How much would you pay for tier 8 premium WT auf E100 ? (50 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

How much would you pay for tier 8 premium WT auf E100 ?

  1. I would pay nothing, do not want it (28 votes [56.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 56.00%

  2. I would pay nothing, but would be prepared to get it for free (marathon, etc.) (11 votes [22.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.00%

  3. I would pay within the usual tier 8 premium price range, not above 40 euros (7 votes [14.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.00%

  4. From 40 to 100 euros (1 vote [2.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.00%

  5. Even over 100 euros, we wants it, we needs its, my precious !!! (3 votes [6.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.00%

Vote Hide poll

qpranger #1 Posted 10 May 2020 - 05:43 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38889 battles
  • 6,424
  • [HAMMY] HAMMY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
How much would you pay for tier 8 premium WT auf E100 ?

gunslingerXXX #2 Posted 10 May 2020 - 06:02 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 14789 battles
  • 4,247
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

does it come with a 100% crew?

 



saxsan4 #3 Posted 10 May 2020 - 06:58 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23447 battles
  • 3,906
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011
its a rubbish tank thats why it was removed

MeNoobTank #4 Posted 10 May 2020 - 06:59 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 19351 battles
  • 1,241
  • [GT_WC] GT_WC
  • Member since:
    02-16-2017
Yes !

Pansenmann #5 Posted 10 May 2020 - 07:19 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 38097 battles
  • 14,553
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

I have three (3) conditions (sic? or is terms the better word)

for it to become available:

 

· 1: un-nerf tier 5 ELC.  Even if it means special +4 mm

· 2: give arty all shell types back (and more like bomblets, incendiaries, smoke)

· 3: buff the goddamn CDC already!


Edited by Pansenmann, 10 May 2020 - 07:20 PM.


Corrupted_Pling #6 Posted 10 May 2020 - 07:20 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 55842 battles
  • 1,139
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012

£0

 

Although rumor has it qpranger's wallet is pretty full atm and is paying for others?



Pansenmann #7 Posted 10 May 2020 - 07:41 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 38097 battles
  • 14,553
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

View PostCorrupted_Pling, on 10 May 2020 - 07:20 PM, said:

£0

 

Although rumor has it qpranger's wallet is pretty full atm and is paying for others?


well, he is a Goldhamster.



krismorgan #8 Posted 11 May 2020 - 10:55 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38692 battles
  • 717
  • [UKT] UKT
  • Member since:
    10-18-2013
I only want it back in its original form

24doom24 #9 Posted 11 May 2020 - 11:24 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9466 battles
  • 1,692
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012
Why would I pay to get penned by HE by anything that looks at me. 

NekoPuffer_PPP #10 Posted 11 May 2020 - 11:24 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 36610 battles
  • 5,141
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

This thing woulda been fine at tier 10 with its 15cm gun if it had the autoloader removed. We wouldn't need the Grille 15. Agree?

 

As an example, the Bulldog had an insane autoloader...then they removed it...and now the tank's fine.

 

Apply logic, problems solved. Well?



Marlekin #11 Posted 11 May 2020 - 11:30 AM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 33973 battles
  • 4,206
  • [BEUKR] BEUKR
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010

View Postkrismorgan, on 11 May 2020 - 10:55 AM, said:

I only want it back in its original form

 

Spoiler

Edited by Marlekin, 11 May 2020 - 11:30 AM.


TankkiPoju #12 Posted 11 May 2020 - 11:30 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 25869 battles
  • 7,980
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 11 May 2020 - 11:24 AM, said:

As an example, the Bulldog had an insane autoloader...then they removed it...and now the tank's fine.

 

Sure, but WG didnt touch T71 DA at all and now T71 DA is even more OP than Bulldog ever was. We just don't complain, because the game has other OP light tanks anyway like LT-432.

 

Mainly because T71 DA's autoloader fits the current meta better due to much shorter clip reload.



saxsan4 #13 Posted 11 May 2020 - 01:26 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23447 battles
  • 3,906
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 11 May 2020 - 10:24 AM, said:

This thing woulda been fine at tier 10 with its 15cm gun if it had the autoloader removed. We wouldn't need the Grille 15. Agree?

 

As an example, the Bulldog had an insane autoloader...then they removed it...and now the tank's fine.

 

Apply logic, problems solved. Well?


but the grille 15 is a real tank design whereas out aux e-100 was fictional



IAmBrexit #14 Posted 11 May 2020 - 01:29 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17560 battles
  • 125
  • Member since:
    02-10-2016
qpranger now working for Wargaming??

NekoPuffer_PPP #15 Posted 11 May 2020 - 02:05 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 36610 battles
  • 5,141
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View Postsaxsan4, on 11 May 2020 - 01:26 PM, said:

but the grille 15 is a real tank design whereas out aux e-100 was fictional

 

Fiction and blueprints haven't stopped other tanks from being in the game. Plus, say what you want, but the WT looks more intimidating than the Grille. It's like the alien queen xenomorph from Aliens. The Grille is just a chassis with a long snorkel on top. Not a reason to keep it in the game, but, you know, just an observation.



dan_dix #16 Posted 11 May 2020 - 02:18 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21516 battles
  • 352
  • Member since:
    01-09-2016

View Postsaxsan4, on 11 May 2020 - 01:26 PM, said:

but the grille 15 is a real tank design whereas out aux e-100 was fictional

 

Yeah, like it was ever physically possible for that gun to fire from that chassis and not launch into orbit...



saxsan4 #17 Posted 11 May 2020 - 02:25 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23447 battles
  • 3,906
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 11 May 2020 - 01:05 PM, said:

 

Fiction and blueprints haven't stopped other tanks from being in the game. Plus, say what you want, but the WT looks more intimidating than the Grille. It's like the alien queen xenomorph from Aliens. The Grille is just a chassis with a long snorkel on top. Not a reason to keep it in the game, but, you know, just an observation.


But if there is a real tank alternative id rather they go with that



SovietBias #18 Posted 11 May 2020 - 02:45 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 40672 battles
  • 1,990
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013
40€ if bundled with camo net/binos and some obscene looking camo pattern.

24doom24 #19 Posted 11 May 2020 - 03:02 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9466 battles
  • 1,692
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View PostNekoPuffer_PPP, on 11 May 2020 - 01:05 PM, said:

 

Fiction and blueprints haven't stopped other tanks from being in the game. Plus, say what you want, but the WT looks more intimidating than the Grille. It's like the alien queen xenomorph from Aliens. The Grille is just a chassis with a long snorkel on top. Not a reason to keep it in the game, but, you know, just an observation.

No reason to keep the WT-E100 either. The Grille 15 is mobile unlike the WT, if you want something menacing and slow go play Jpz E100



RoziMaslacak #20 Posted 11 May 2020 - 06:54 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17633 battles
  • 47
  • [HR-P] HR-P
  • Member since:
    09-12-2016

View Postqpranger, on 10 May 2020 - 05:43 PM, said:

How much would you pay for tier 8 premium WT auf E100 ?

They need to give me money, then i play. :)


Edited by RoziMaslacak, 11 May 2020 - 06:55 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users