Jump to content


Sick and tired of gold spamming. Make premium ammo for gold only or triple the price.

Gold spamming

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
40 replies to this topic

Poll: Should premium ammo be available for gold only again? (22 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

What good is armor when everyone is just spamming gold all day long?

  1. Yes for gold only (15 votes [65.22%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 65.22%

  2. No just triple the price in credits (8 votes [34.78%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 34.78%

Vote Hide poll

marsbar1011 #1 Posted 16 May 2020 - 07:13 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 28391 battles
  • 1
  • [22ACU] 22ACU
  • Member since:
    08-08-2013
Make premium ammo for gold only or triple the price so that you will lose credits if you just fire premium rounds. What good is having armor when everyone just spams gold all day long? Make the game so that you have to outplay others and not outpay them

Edited by marsbar1011, 16 May 2020 - 07:15 PM.


boboiscool #2 Posted 16 May 2020 - 07:17 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2275 battles
  • 75
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

I have 80M credits, do you think I care if the price was trippled?

View Postmarsbar1011, on 16 May 2020 - 07:13 PM, said:

Make premium ammo for gold only or triple the price so that you will lose credits if you just fire premium rounds. What good is having armor when everyone just spams gold all day long? Make the game so that you have to outplay others and not outpay them

Looks like your already get outplayed.


Edited by boboiscool, 16 May 2020 - 07:18 PM.


GodTank2 #3 Posted 16 May 2020 - 07:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 10854 battles
  • 853
  • [BARRY] BARRY
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012
nice poll

Galan7891 #4 Posted 16 May 2020 - 07:32 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 10367 battles
  • 721
  • Member since:
    02-22-2018

Tripling the price doesnt make a difference when there are people with 100+ million credits.Making it available for gold only will not make any difference considering the ammount of people that throw money at the game every chance they get.Both these options take away from F2P players primarily...wether that is good or bad is up to debate.

Your "solutions" will make people "outpay enemies".


Edited by Galan7891, 16 May 2020 - 07:34 PM.


Leadfire #5 Posted 16 May 2020 - 07:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 8069 battles
  • 288
  • Member since:
    12-28-2010

View Postmarsbar1011, on 16 May 2020 - 06:13 PM, said:

 Make the game so that you have to outplay others and not outpay them

I haven't spent a penny, no need to...so something else is the problem.



Balc0ra #6 Posted 16 May 2020 - 07:36 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 77265 battles
  • 23,300
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

So... make the game really p2w? So only a few can spam it at you, especially after the Xmas loot boxes? Brilliant.

 

And if they triple the price in silver, I doubt you will see a decline in the usages of it on high tiers. But you might on lower tiers as some of the autoloaders there costs 300K to fill up as is.



Shaka_D #7 Posted 16 May 2020 - 07:50 PM

    Colonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 38156 battles
  • 3,767
  • Member since:
    10-18-2010
Must say, I've returned to play the game after 3 to 4 years and its sad to see how little armour still means when all people do is spam premium ammo.

ZlatanArKung #8 Posted 16 May 2020 - 07:52 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1537 battles
  • 5,768
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Just make premium ammo cost same as standard ammo.
18:53 Added after 1 minute

View Postmarsbar1011, on 16 May 2020 - 07:13 PM, said:

Make the game so that you have to outplay others and not outpay them

This is already mostly the case.

But making premium ammo cost same as standard ammo will make it more so.



Blubba #9 Posted 16 May 2020 - 08:19 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 63999 battles
  • 2,653
  • Member since:
    05-30-2011

Or limit the amount so the payers can only load as many as the non payers....

Unicums can load as many as tomatoes.

At least it would be balanced.

You can't moan then but oh boy, you'll really see the bitching then. 

 

Still, this one has been done to death.



Objec7 #10 Posted 16 May 2020 - 08:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17179 battles
  • 693
  • [OOUUF] OOUUF
  • Member since:
    03-25-2017

View Postmarsbar1011, on 16 May 2020 - 07:13 PM, said:

Make premium ammo for gold only or triple the price so that you will lose credits if you just fire premium rounds. What good is having armor when everyone just spams gold all day long? Make the game so that you have to outplay others and not outpay them

Go to tanks.gg and learn to angle your armor. Gold ammo doesn't pen everything



tajj7 #11 Posted 16 May 2020 - 08:52 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29563 battles
  • 17,898
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

No thanks, the game is already dominated by armour as it is. 

 

'Armour is useless' yet all the best tanks in the game are armoured pretty much and have premium ammo shot at them, so take that away and a load of strong tanks become OP and a load of already OP tanks become stupidly OP. 



LethalWalou #12 Posted 16 May 2020 - 09:00 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 35444 battles
  • 3,206
  • [OISPA] OISPA
  • Member since:
    09-17-2012
Tripling the price, or in general increasing the price at all, is pretty much the stupidest thing they could do. It needs to be either removed or given a clear disadvantage while the price is set to same as standard ammo.

boboiscool #13 Posted 16 May 2020 - 09:17 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2275 battles
  • 75
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostBlubba, on 16 May 2020 - 08:19 PM, said:

Or limit the amount so the payers can only load as many as the non payers....

Unicums can load as many as tomatoes.

Lol, already possible ingame. 



The_Naa #14 Posted 16 May 2020 - 09:31 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11543 battles
  • 2,289
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    11-10-2017

View Postboboiscool, on 16 May 2020 - 09:17 PM, said:

Lol, already possible ingame. 

Yes i can only carry the maximum of 25 HEAT rounds in my JPE-100 but i can also load it full with 25 AP or HE shells. So ye there is a limit, you are not wrong but still missing something important. 


Edited by The_Naa, 16 May 2020 - 09:32 PM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #15 Posted 16 May 2020 - 09:47 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 36967 battles
  • 6,111
  • [FISHY] FISHY
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
OP, as someone who spends most of their time in arty which has no armour anyway why do you care what people are firing at you? You're just as dead either way.

fwhaatpiraat #16 Posted 17 May 2020 - 02:39 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 63363 battles
  • 2,636
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013
The link between performance and economy (credits) makes no sense gameplay wise. Business wise however... Don't expect any changes. Sex sells, imbalance as well.

Hyina #17 Posted 17 May 2020 - 02:42 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 65458 battles
  • 582
  • Member since:
    05-16-2013
Or you know, just lower the dmg.
01:42 Added after 0 minute

View PostThe_Naa, on 16 May 2020 - 09:31 PM, said:

Yes i can only carry the maximum of 25 HEAT rounds in my JPE-100 but i can also load it full with 25 AP or HE shells. So ye there is a limit, you are not wrong but still missing something important. 

 

We all know best way to play Jag is full HE 



Ragoutrabbit #18 Posted 17 May 2020 - 05:25 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11650 battles
  • 1,164
  • Member since:
    11-08-2012
Games pay to win and will likely get worse over time.

malachi6 #19 Posted 17 May 2020 - 08:19 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 51526 battles
  • 4,593
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
I do enjoy a biased poll that can only ever reflect the pollsters opinions.  When formulating a hypothesis, a measure of its accuracy is being able to construct parameters that if discovered, will disprove it; the null hypothesis.  An easy data point to insert in this poll is, Do not change the pricing of premium ammo.

RaxipIx #20 Posted 17 May 2020 - 08:34 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 36314 battles
  • 1,688
  • [TFUK] TFUK
  • Member since:
    02-22-2016

Game is pay to win they say. Yet people keep paying and keep sucking at it.

 

 

Maybe WG should make a graph how many fort knoxes start giving the so called "rigged RNG":coin:







Also tagged with Gold spamming

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users