Jump to content


Char Futur 4: the Musketeer of the Expedition


  • Please log in to reply
104 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 23 May 2020 - 08:00 AM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 33,886
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
This valiant French hero is available as a reward for participating in the Expedition. Find out more about it here!

The full text of the news item

Full_metal_bellend #2 Posted 23 May 2020 - 08:25 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 15077 battles
  • 25
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    11-19-2018
Autoloader not autoreloader.

papageo_cy #3 Posted 23 May 2020 - 08:25 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 72212 battles
  • 199
  • [RSX] RSX
  • Member since:
    08-28-2013
I read it but I still don't understand! Is it autoloader (like Lorraine) or autoreloader (like Progetto)?

Samulayo #4 Posted 23 May 2020 - 08:56 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14056 battles
  • 164
  • [D-SEN] D-SEN
  • Member since:
    01-16-2014
Please consider add ammo capacity in future. 
32 shells will result weird situation when you stay against numerous enemies in long-lasting battle and force to drive around empty.
Imagine someone's pain outplaying all normal tanks and not be able to finish artillery at the end...
Make it 40 shells. 

Anyway, tank is pretty interesting, with potential.

Ser__Jaime_Lannister #5 Posted 23 May 2020 - 08:58 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 9387 battles
  • 2,144
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    01-10-2012
No thanks. I will take the bonds compensation.

TheMaroko1337 #6 Posted 23 May 2020 - 09:24 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16377 battles
  • 150
  • Member since:
    04-15-2011
If you could ban more than 2 maps , it could be interesting otherwise it's gonna be difficult as you have to play it as a sniper and you have 4s between every shell of a clip. 

Hexenwahn #7 Posted 23 May 2020 - 09:28 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 21434 battles
  • 66
  • [MDBLT] MDBLT
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

I saw the title Char Futur 4: the Musketeer of the Expedition and I thought "Wow, WG is giving an awesome premium tank for free as part of their ultra-super-grand World of Tanks’ 10th Anniversary!".

 

But not, they're giving it as reward for the grinds known as Frontline and Steel Hunter.

 

Since now all this World of Tanks’ 10th Anniversary was nothing but offers for special bundles, offers for outdated premium tanks and free shipping for WG store..



basin79 #8 Posted 23 May 2020 - 09:38 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 15461 battles
  • 9,090
  • Member since:
    03-13-2012

View PostHexenwahn, on 23 May 2020 - 09:28 AM, said:

I saw the title Char Futur 4: the Musketeer of the Expedition and I thought "Wow, WG is giving an awesome premium tank for free as part of their ultra-super-grand World of Tanks’ 10th Anniversary!".

 

But not, they're giving it as reward for the grinds known as Frontline and Steel Hunter.

 

Since now all this World of Tanks’ 10th Anniversary was nothing but offers for special bundles, offers for outdated premium tanks and free shipping for WG store..

You must be new here if you think WG would give a brand new tier 8 premium tank away even discounting the fact it was a reward for playing the different modes. 



rimmer_the #9 Posted 23 May 2020 - 09:41 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 3571 battles
  • 138
  • [H-F-T] H-F-T
  • Member since:
    04-21-2016

View PostSamulayo, on 23 May 2020 - 08:56 AM, said:


Imagine someone's pain outplaying all normal tanks and not be able to finish artillery at the end...
 

Full ramming speed!

08:44 Added after 2 minute

View Postbasin79, on 23 May 2020 - 09:38 AM, said:

You must be new here if you think WG would give a brand new tier 8 premium tank away even discounting the fact it was a reward for playing the different modes. 

Hrm, for my 10th anniversary of my company I would do something more special than WG does now...



Truntea #10 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:06 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1437 battles
  • 441
  • Member since:
    04-20-2015
Well it still beat the Russian weakspot heavy.

Danihe_2400 #11 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:16 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1613 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    12-29-2018

Well at least they make this choise a lot more easier,everyone knows AE phase I is the first choise.

Then it doesnt matter which one left you are picking up,because you won't really care about which one is better in two pieces of rubbish.



Zapfhan #12 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:25 AM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 24417 battles
  • 1,731
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    04-11-2015

View Postpapageo_cy, on 23 May 2020 - 07:25 AM, said:

I read it but I still don't understand! Is it autoloader (like Lorraine) or autoreloader (like Progetto)?

 

It is an Autoloader like the Lorraine or B-C tanks :)

 

 

View Postrimmer_the, on 23 May 2020 - 08:41 AM, said:

Hrm, for my 10th anniversary of my company I would do something more special than WG does now...

 

Wait till its over. 

 



dachacg #13 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:28 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 30339 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    05-21-2013
Nah, I will take AE Phase I

Gremlin182 #14 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:35 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 63307 battles
  • 10,403
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

Reward tanks are starting to feel less rewarding.

4 seconds between shots whats the point of that, autoloaders are known for their burst damage then slow clip reload.

This seems the worst of both standard and autoloader types.

380 view range nothing to write home about either..

 

Its still going to be the tank I go for

Please consider reducing inter-clip time to maybe 3 seconds adding a few more shells 32 is very few 40 plus much more usable for a tier 9 tank.

View range meh Its not great but I can probably life with it.

There is no reason to make premium tanks better than standard tanks and there is definitely no excuse for making reward tanks worse than both.

 

 



O_o_Babbuino #15 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:37 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 43866 battles
  • 457
  • [SCOBA] SCOBA
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011

it is not an autoreloader....who is writing this articles??????

 

but in fact if it would have been an autoreloader it would be competetive.....what a coincidence

 

since it is an autoloader....and interclip is 4 sec....it is......bad

 

Imagine E50 which has 4,04s reload


Edited by O_o_Babbuino, 23 May 2020 - 10:51 AM.


Simona2k #16 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:43 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4370 battles
  • 1,244
  • [FOXZA] FOXZA
  • Member since:
    10-01-2017
Nice looking

Profesor_Baltazar #17 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:47 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 24175 battles
  • 135
  • [-M_C-] -M_C-
  • Member since:
    03-07-2014
Auto NOT loader, STB-1 with crew and equioment has reload arround 5 secconds and this crapbetween shoots 4 sec!!! Trust me, it is pile of kaku.

Smegger213 #18 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:49 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15195 battles
  • 538
  • [-4DC-] -4DC-
  • Member since:
    08-16-2012

40 second reload lol

Wargaming, are you taking the p__s.

 

I will pass.



Profesor_Baltazar #19 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:50 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 24175 battles
  • 135
  • [-M_C-] -M_C-
  • Member since:
    03-07-2014

View PostDanihe_2400, on 23 May 2020 - 09:16 AM, said:

Well at least they make this choise a lot more easier,everyone knows AE phase I is the first choise.

Then it doesnt matter which one left you are picking up,because you won't really care about which one is better in two pieces of rubbish.

First option is correct, but seccond one is wrong. You need to take bonds for tank, not this craptanks.



Anymn #20 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:52 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21339 battles
  • 482
  • [RHPA] RHPA
  • Member since:
    07-06-2011
4 seconds intra-clip doesn't match well with 4 rounds AND 40 seconds reload. It's just too slow, and after those 4 shells you're out of business again. In contrast, many tanks shoot with 6-7 seconds reload, but without an awful 40 seconds clip reload.

It would be a whole different story if this would be an autoREloader, with e.g. 10 seconds loading for each shell. Them 4 seconds would be balanced.




4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users