Jump to content


430U should NOT be nerfed


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

Zoltan1251 #1 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14679 battles
  • 712
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
So we get the only tank on par with reward monsters taken out. 

I disagree with nerfing OBJ 430U before 279e and Chieftain!!!!!!!!!! WG, your balance is a joke, who will play ranked you fools?

shikaka9 #2 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:14 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 78498 battles
  • 2,404
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013

430y is not nerfed, its buffed... we just need to find where when it will hit servers

 

 

as usual


Edited by shikaka9, 23 May 2020 - 10:15 PM.


Spurtung #3 Posted 23 May 2020 - 10:18 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 80837 battles
  • 8,179
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

Wait, so Italians are fine to nerf, but 430U is the one that shouldn't be touched?

Kappa, and that makes your whole argument about balance hilarious.



StronkiTonki #4 Posted 24 May 2020 - 05:28 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Clan Commander
  • 35752 battles
  • 1,401
  • [T0AST] T0AST
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

I can see and agree with that point of view. 430U would definitely be good to stay the same, in the case of still being kinda competetive against the CW/Reward tanks.

The best thing imho would just to nerf ALL OP tanks on tier 10, including rewards and CW tanks.

 

Butyeah, a nerf is a nerf, and the 430U is OP and should also get nerfed. But I definitely understand that you want to stay competetive against CW/Rewards.

For me personally it doesn't bother me that much. I barely play tier 10 anyway, since it's a total broken garbage tier anyway.

And if I play ranked, I refuse to participate in the broken hulldown META where all you do is bounce prem shells off eachother's turrets.

I'd rather just do more stupid and entertaining things like arty, EBR or Foch 155 with HE in ranked.



JocMeister #5 Posted 24 May 2020 - 06:13 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 29237 battles
  • 2,831
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostZoltan1251, on 23 May 2020 - 10:12 PM, said:

So we get the only tank on par with reward monsters taken out. 

I disagree with nerfing OBJ 430U before 279e and Chieftain!!!!!!!!!! WG, your balance is a joke, who will play ranked you fools?

 

Having other OPed and broken tanks in the game to balance out other broken and OPed tanks in the game is probably not a very good idea...

 

But yeah, nerfing the 430U because its "over performing" while letting the 279 and Chieftain stay as they are is just silly. But in 2-3 years WG will have "collected enough data" on them and either slammed them to the ground or give them some silly nerf that doesn´t really change anything. 



pihip #6 Posted 24 May 2020 - 10:53 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17342 battles
  • 1,602
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013
At first I thought you were joking, but your argument makes at least some sense.

Problem is, making OP tanks to counter other OP tanks is not the way to go. Nerfing all problem tanks (yes Chieftain and 279 are included) would make much more sense.

DeBanus #7 Posted 24 May 2020 - 11:24 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30297 battles
  • 331
  • [-NARF] -NARF
  • Member since:
    11-19-2011
You are comparing reward tanks (heavy tanks) with a tech tree medium tank. 

ares354 #8 Posted 24 May 2020 - 11:28 AM

    Colonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 78495 battles
  • 3,708
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010
Its funny how WG dont wonna piss off all owners of OP tanks like 907, 279, Chieftain, but its fine to piss off all owners of tech tech tree tanks that stand a change vs those things. 430U is OP, that true. 

But why he or Progetto 65 should be nerfed but Vk 72, Chieftain, 907, 279 shouldnt ? Make 0 sense and its typical commie logic. 

WG are hypocrites, false to the BONES. 

Edited by ares354, 24 May 2020 - 11:28 AM.


_6i6_ #9 Posted 24 May 2020 - 11:33 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25586 battles
  • 590
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    03-22-2018

well they are nerfing tech tree tanks for a reason....

guess what is it..



AvengerOrion #10 Posted 24 May 2020 - 11:33 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28568 battles
  • 1,387
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013

How dare they add two tiny 275mm weakspots to an overpowered tank.

How dare they make the Obj 430U have to slow down to be able to hit something.

Now it's totally trash and unplayable.

 

*Throws keyboard through the screen*

 



ares354 #11 Posted 24 May 2020 - 11:40 AM

    Colonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 78495 battles
  • 3,708
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View PostAvengerOrion, on 24 May 2020 - 11:33 AM, said:

How dare they add two tiny 275mm weakspots to an overpowered tank.

How dare they make the Obj 430U have to slow down to be able to hit something.

Now it's totally trash and unplayable.

 

*Throws keyboard through the screen*

 

You dont get it, do you ? 

They dont nerf OP tanks like 279, Chieftains, 907 because some people work hard to get it. With tech tree tanks they will nerf to ground, no matter how much work you put to get em. 



kaneloon #12 Posted 24 May 2020 - 11:44 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33044 battles
  • 4,567
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011

Reward tanks mean serious dedicated players.

WG can't bear competitive tanks that can be unlocked with some battles and some blueprints.



AvengerOrion #13 Posted 24 May 2020 - 11:44 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28568 battles
  • 1,387
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013

View Postares354, on 24 May 2020 - 11:40 AM, said:

You dont get it, do you ? 

They dont nerf OP tanks like 279, Chieftains, 907 because some people work hard to get it. With tech tree tanks they will nerf to ground, no matter how much work you put to get em. 


:facepalm:



pihip #14 Posted 24 May 2020 - 11:48 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17342 battles
  • 1,602
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View Postkaneloon, on 24 May 2020 - 11:44 AM, said:

Reward tanks mean serious dedicated players.


Have you tried typing "World of Tanks" on eBay?

I did the other day, the amount of people selling boosting services (full grind to Object 279e is 300-500 euros iirc) is staggering.



_6i6_ #15 Posted 24 May 2020 - 12:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25586 battles
  • 590
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    03-22-2018

View Postpihip, on 24 May 2020 - 12:48 PM, said:


Have you tried typing "World of Tanks" on eBay?

I did the other day, the amount of people selling boosting services (full grind to Object 279e is 300-500 euros iirc) is staggering.

 

and people actually spend money for that??



fwhaatpiraat #16 Posted 24 May 2020 - 12:18 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 63442 battles
  • 2,639
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    05-04-2013

View PostZoltan1251, on 23 May 2020 - 10:12 PM, said:

So we get the only tank on par with reward monsters taken out. 

I disagree with nerfing OBJ 430U before 279e and Chieftain!!!!!!!!!! WG, your balance is a joke, who will play ranked you fools?

Nooooo, my OP tonk, noooo WG, nooooo



24doom24 #17 Posted 24 May 2020 - 12:21 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9494 battles
  • 1,709
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

View Post_6i6_, on 24 May 2020 - 11:09 AM, said:

 

and people actually spend money for that??

Probably. Every once in a while I come across some 47% player with a 279e. 



Galan7891 #18 Posted 24 May 2020 - 12:26 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 10399 battles
  • 730
  • Member since:
    02-22-2018
You are correct 430U shouldnt be nerfed!Afterall dabbing the 2 key seems to "balans" it even now...But neither should the spagetto 65 be nerfed.

Kalonianhydra #19 Posted 24 May 2020 - 12:31 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32568 battles
  • 409
  • Member since:
    07-19-2013
The nerf is welcome, but the 279 and T95/4201 needs it badly as well.

Objec7 #20 Posted 24 May 2020 - 12:31 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17296 battles
  • 700
  • [OOUUF] OOUUF
  • Member since:
    03-25-2017

View Postfwhaatpiraat, on 24 May 2020 - 12:18 PM, said:

Nooooo, my OP tonk, noooo WG, nooooo

So that's why the Progetto owners cry about nerf too? :)






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users