Jump to content

Return EU3, please!


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

Poll: EU3 (26 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Return EU 3 ?

  1. Yes (9 votes [34.62%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 34.62%

  2. No (17 votes [65.38%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 65.38%

Vote Hide poll

djazzoff #1 Posted 25 May 2020 - 09:23 PM


  • Player
  • 16142 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:

Well, for the 1st time in many ears, with 2 server's and common problem on SPG's, their rebalancing and any other change's made to them, they are still annoying and now even more, due to the stun mechanic and we have to deal with that no matter what. BUT with the release of EU3, I saw a balancing factor of spg's, due to one additional server, you were no longer getting an SPG on every single game. For example with 2 server's on, you get 1 out of 10 battles without SPG's, but with 3 server's, it seemed like you get 3-4 games out of 10 without SPG's and other game's you got more time's with a single SPG in macth, than usuall 2 or 3. Especially at higher tier's, it seems you get more game's with 2-3 SPG's than 1 or 0.


I think introducing an EU3 server, fixed the problem with SPG balancing in matches, SPG player's got more spreaded between 3 server's and because of that, less matches were you had SPG's. Which made it possible to do certain missions on certain map's where you could hold strong or push strong due to your tank's characteristics, but the only one class who could ruin your hold/push was SPG's. With less of them appearing in matches, when 3 server's were online, you had much better gameplay, you could play your slow tanks more efficiently, due to not needing, to drive close to the map border, to avoid spotting, that SPG's won't remove half of your hitpoint's before you got into cover.


I ask for the return of EU 3, it's not the only reason why EU 3 was good for the community and I think many more pleyer's would agree with me :]

wsatnutter #2 Posted 25 May 2020 - 09:31 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27591 battles
  • 10,414
  • Member since:
actually no we dont

Steve8066 #3 Posted 25 May 2020 - 10:01 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 22177 battles
  • 1,244
  • Member since:
nah it was laggy as hell.

Balc0ra #4 Posted 25 May 2020 - 11:00 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 77836 battles
  • 23,619
  • Member since:
EU 3 was "borrowed" from the RU cluster. As they got it back, I doubt we will see the return of it soon.

psychobear #5 Posted 26 May 2020 - 12:48 AM


  • Player
  • 20552 battles
  • 2,368
  • [7EVEN] 7EVEN
  • Member since:
@OP - the SPG problem would be solved much easier and way more efficiently by simply removing the SPG class alltogether. It's not needed in the game anyway and it should have never been implemented to begin with.

moenie #6 Posted 26 May 2020 - 12:50 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21276 battles
  • 302
  • Member since:

It was put in to help the load on the server but it honestly didn't work that well in reality.

Personally I would much rather they upgrade the existing servers than add a new one.


To anwser that statement about SPG's:

Servers are not and should never be a balancing feature.

Edited by moenie, 26 May 2020 - 02:11 AM.

krismorgan #7 Posted 26 May 2020 - 10:14 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38794 battles
  • 735
  • [UKT] UKT
  • Member since:
Never an "i don`t care" option?

DaniulSims #8 Posted 26 May 2020 - 10:30 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11477 battles
  • 1,085
  • [ELC3K] ELC3K
  • Member since:
What makes you think the SPG pop wouldn't get spread out and you'd get the same amount of SPGs anyway?

Frostilicus #9 Posted 26 May 2020 - 11:57 AM


  • Clan Diplomat
  • 24199 battles
  • 3,779
  • [-ZNO-] -ZNO-
  • Member since:

View PostBalc0ra, on 25 May 2020 - 10:00 PM, said:

EU 3 was "borrowed" from the RU cluster. As they got it back, I doubt we will see the return of it soon.


This was my understanding too, it was a server put in for EU but ended up being used to load balance the RU servers.

I don't think the player base is high enough to warrant the OP's idea of a permanent EU3 either.

Also tagged with EU3

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users