Jump to content


Obj 777 II armor bug? 0mm turret armor

Bug Obj 777 II

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

RazerTeck #1 Posted 28 May 2020 - 08:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8633 battles
  • 318
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    04-14-2016

i know it says NaNmm whatever that means, but i tested this a bit in training rooms, any tank with HE can pen underneath the gun. this is a problem since the 777 is a low as it is, aiming up at weak spots like cupolas will expose this somewhat weird weak spot that any tank can pen with HE, even tier 1 tanks with HE can pen under the gun (don't know why that's relevant tho)

This should probably be in off topic maybe? i don't know..



BravelyRanAway #2 Posted 28 May 2020 - 08:36 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 25755 battles
  • 13,827
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010
It's the same for the IS-7.

MeetriX #3 Posted 28 May 2020 - 08:55 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 27470 battles
  • 4,916
  • [_ACE] _ACE
  • Member since:
    08-12-2012

It is not a bug. It is a hole.

Drop the gun and the mantlet should cover it.



no_skill_bob #4 Posted 28 May 2020 - 09:32 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 34656 battles
  • 2,437
  • [FARM-] FARM-
  • Member since:
    10-31-2013

good to know :D

although you rarely see this crap anyway


Edited by Voldemars_Veiss, 28 May 2020 - 09:34 PM.


BravelyRanAway #5 Posted 28 May 2020 - 09:52 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 25755 battles
  • 13,827
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostVoldemars_Veiss, on 28 May 2020 - 08:32 PM, said:

good to know :D

although you rarely see this crap anyway

Well, if you also meet IS-7's and they decide to face hug you and they aim for your cupola...just shoot them under the gun.

 

PS:- Interesting name change choice.



F_U_R_Y_666 #6 Posted 29 May 2020 - 09:19 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11204 battles
  • 33
  • Member since:
    12-28-2014
How is the obj 777 II good, ok or don't bother? what's you view on it. cheers.

MightyBalls_2 #7 Posted 29 May 2020 - 09:42 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13707 battles
  • 233
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014

Its not a bug or a hole. its a website issue.

 

The website does not have the exact modelling because it is a 3rd party app.


Edited by MightyBalls_2, 29 May 2020 - 09:43 AM.


Dava_117 #8 Posted 29 May 2020 - 10:04 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Moderator
  • 24622 battles
  • 6,851
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostMightyBalls_2, on 29 May 2020 - 09:42 AM, said:

Its not a bug or a hole. its a website issue.

 

The website does not have the exact modelling because it is a 3rd party app.

 

No, it's a real hole in the armour. Is not the first and won't be the last tank with that. Other tanks that have it are, in example, KV-4, IS-7 and JPz4



frange #9 Posted 29 May 2020 - 10:06 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 33518 battles
  • 298
  • [FRNR] FRNR
  • Member since:
    10-25-2013
What? A weakspot on rashan Super Stalinium bobject? That must be of bug! Fix immediately! Must have minimum 600mm of spaced armor of everywhere! 

RazerTeck #10 Posted 29 May 2020 - 10:40 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8633 battles
  • 318
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    04-14-2016

View PostF_U_R_Y_666, on 29 May 2020 - 09:19 AM, said:

How is the obj 777 II good, ok or don't bother? what's you view on it. cheers.

it really depends on your play style, i bet there is a thread somewhere discussing what is the best of the three, personally i think the 777 is ok situational depends really on how you play it and what you are up against.



WindSplitter1 #11 Posted 29 May 2020 - 06:43 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 21765 battles
  • 4,148
  • [WINDY] WINDY
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

If anyone is wondering:

 

NaN = Not a Number



Bulldog_Drummond #12 Posted 30 May 2020 - 11:26 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36271 battles
  • 12,259
  • [DRATT] DRATT
  • Member since:
    08-10-2014

I had never heard of the 777 until I came across one last week on Pilsen.

In a close range fight my Tortoise demolished it without any difficulty.



RazerTeck #13 Posted 31 May 2020 - 07:53 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8633 battles
  • 318
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    04-14-2016

View PostWindSplitter1, on 29 May 2020 - 06:43 PM, said:

If anyone is wondering:

 

NaN = Not a Number

good to know, cheers

View PostBulldog_Drummond, on 30 May 2020 - 11:26 AM, said:

I had never heard of the 777 until I came across one last week on Pilsen.

In a close range fight my Tortoise demolished it without any difficulty.

yup i brawled one in my ST-I, easy 1 VS 1, Tech tree tank is far superior in armor and they have almost the same gun so..



Dramya #14 Posted 31 May 2020 - 01:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18004 battles
  • 648
  • [_PZF_] _PZF_
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostMightyBalls_2, on 29 May 2020 - 10:42 AM, said:

Its not a bug or a hole. its a website issue.

 

The website does not have the exact modelling because it is a 3rd party app.

 

This is *the* way of being accused of cheating :) Just aim down and penetrate with HE, people go ballistic when they do not know how they get penetrated while facehugging.



MightyBalls_2 #15 Posted 01 June 2020 - 08:13 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13707 battles
  • 233
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014

View PostDava_117, on 29 May 2020 - 09:04 AM, said:

 

No, it's a real hole in the armour. Is not the first and won't be the last tank with that. Other tanks that have it are, in example, KV-4, IS-7 and JPz4

 

Wrong. NaN is a programming language that means "Not A Numeric Value". Which means that the 3rd party app does not know what to show because there is a glitch in modelling that they have rendered through their own app, not world of tanks.

 

I have tested this theory in a training room and you can not pen this area with HE, which would be the case if it was 0mm of armour!



Dava_117 #16 Posted 01 June 2020 - 09:34 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Moderator
  • 24622 battles
  • 6,851
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-17-2014

View PostMightyBalls_2, on 01 June 2020 - 08:13 AM, said:

 

Wrong. NaN is a programming language that means "Not A Numeric Value". Which means that the 3rd party app does not know what to show because there is a glitch in modelling that they have rendered through their own app, not world of tanks.

 

I have tested this theory in a training room and you can not pen this area with HE, which would be the case if it was 0mm of armour!

 

I know what NaN means. That is why I checked it on Armour Inspector before posting, which shows 0mm armour.

Now, if you tested it on a training room, would be interesting to see which armour level does the game consider on those points, so we can try to understand why the usually reliable armour viewer have those problems.



Nazgarth #17 Posted 01 June 2020 - 10:43 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28472 battles
  • 1,287
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011
Must be a bug, Russian tanks arn't supposed to have weakspots  :trollface:

Edited by Nazgarth, 01 June 2020 - 10:43 AM.


Dramya #18 Posted 01 June 2020 - 05:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18004 battles
  • 648
  • [_PZF_] _PZF_
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostMightyBalls_2, on 01 June 2020 - 09:13 AM, said:

 

Wrong. NaN is a programming language that means "Not A Numeric Value". Which means that the 3rd party app does not know what to show because there is a glitch in modelling that they have rendered through their own app, not world of tanks.

 

I have tested this theory in a training room and you can not pen this area with HE, which would be the case if it was 0mm of armour!

 

Not exactly, it can also mean there is a division by 0 somewhere which is impossible and hence gives a NaN. How and why? Don't know. It's not the effective armor calculation in any case.



BravelyRanAway #19 Posted 01 June 2020 - 06:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 25755 battles
  • 13,827
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostMightyBalls_2, on 01 June 2020 - 07:13 AM, said:

 

I have tested this theory in a training room and you can not pen this area with HE, which would be the case if it was 0mm of armour!

It's 130mm.

Spoiler

 







Also tagged with Bug, Obj 777 II

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users