Jump to content


Russian tanks


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

John_Black_Jack_Pershing #1 Posted 08 June 2020 - 12:54 AM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 21085 battles
  • 36
  • [SW-PB] SW-PB
  • Member since:
    07-26-2010
Russian tanks, tds, artillery and anything else, still have too much armour.  All Russian/Soviet vehicles should have a 205mm reduction in armour protection to reflect historical values.
23:55 Added after 1 minute

View PostJohn_Black_Jack_Pershing, on 08 June 2020 - 12:54 AM, said:

Russian tanks, tds, artillery and anything else, still have too much armour.  All Russian/Soviet vehicles should have a 205mm reduction in armour protection to reflect historical values.

Sorry, I should have clarified. This is against HE ammo, the other types of armour should be 400mm armour reduction.



Inappropriate_noob #2 Posted 08 June 2020 - 02:10 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19011 battles
  • 5,793
  • [KV1] KV1
  • Member since:
    09-23-2011

View PostJohn_Black_Jack_Pershing, on 08 June 2020 - 12:54 AM, said:

Russian tanks, tds, artillery and anything else, still have too much armour.  All Russian/Soviet vehicles should have a 205mm reduction in armour protection to reflect historical values.
23:55 Added after 1 minute

Sorry, I should have clarified. This is against HE ammo, the other types of armour should be 400mm armour reduction.

I am sure WG will take note of what you think their tanks should have, the reality is their house their rules don't like go eat a $%^&, and they won't give a damn.



Spurtung #3 Posted 08 June 2020 - 04:05 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 82405 battles
  • 8,454
  • [USSRX] USSRX
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostJohn_Black_Jack_Pershing, on 07 June 2020 - 11:54 PM, said:

All Russian/Soviet vehicles should have a 205mm reduction in armour protection to reflect historical values.

 

And any other tank that never even existed or saw service should be removed completely?

Not judging the value of your argument, but if you're championing for historical authenticity, you should look for a simulator, not try to make WoT be what you wish it was.



Hedgehog1963 #4 Posted 08 June 2020 - 04:24 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 58583 battles
  • 7,931
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
Why tho'?

saxsan4 #5 Posted 08 June 2020 - 04:36 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25823 battles
  • 4,630
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011
what

arthurwellsley #6 Posted 08 June 2020 - 10:24 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 56495 battles
  • 4,462
  • [J1FTD] J1FTD
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View PostJohn_Black_Jack_Pershing, on 07 June 2020 - 11:54 PM, said:

Russian tanks, tds, artillery and anything else, still have too much armour.  All Russian/Soviet vehicles should have a 205mm reduction in armour protection to reflect historical values.
23:55 Added after 1 minute

Sorry, I should have clarified. This is against HE ammo, the other types of armour should be 400mm armour reduction.

 

War Gaming is a Belarusian creation now resident in Cyprus.

The game was designed for a Russian audience.

There is a tiny NA server population. There are two EU severs with a bigger population.

There are seven RU servers. The RU servers have at east five times the number of regular players than EU and NA combined.

What you or any other european thinks about balance or comments on in an English speaking forum is irrelevant to War Gaming.

Most of their money comes from those seven RU servers and that is where the game is designed to appeal to.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users