Jump to content


FCM 50 t: Heavy or Medium? Yes!


  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

rimmer_the #41 Posted 24 June 2020 - 05:52 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3652 battles
  • 210
  • [H-F-T] H-F-T
  • Member since:
    04-21-2016
Buff now, try to shill it later, WG. 

Badz360 #42 Posted 24 June 2020 - 06:30 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24280 battles
  • 483
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostSael_, on 24 June 2020 - 05:11 PM, said:

Please be mindful that not every tank has to be the best vehicle on the battlefield. :) 

 

Please be mindful to accurately describe the product you are selling.



Laatikkomafia #43 Posted 24 June 2020 - 07:27 PM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 23824 battles
  • 5,124
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    12-27-2010

View PostSael_, on 24 June 2020 - 06:11 PM, said:

Please be mindful that not every tank has to be the best vehicle on the battlefield. :) There is a place for every machine. On top of that, there's various types of players out there, some of whom are of the collector kind and like to acquire tanks regardless of the performance.

 

Please be mindful that WG asks 28 € for an outdated tank that is literally free XP and credits for modern tier 8-10s.



oBmg #44 Posted 24 June 2020 - 08:19 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4349 battles
  • 75
  • [-SOC-] -SOC-
  • Member since:
    12-30-2019

View PostSael_, on 24 June 2020 - 05:11 PM, said:

Please be mindful that not every tank has to be the best vehicle on the battlefield. :) There is a place for every machine. On top of that, there's various types of players out there, some of whom are of the collector kind and like to acquire tanks regardless of the perform

 

Players have provided solid list of bad Premium tanks .Some tanks are debatable, but some are bad by almost a consensus.

There is no reason to sell (unchanged) bad premium tanks, to people ,for money , those   which majority of players  obviously consider bad.

This is payed masochism you are asking from us , and uneccessary liability that hurts relationship of players with the game.

 

 


Edited by oBmg, 24 June 2020 - 09:08 PM.


Alcoholic_Hellhound #45 Posted 24 June 2020 - 08:47 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39736 battles
  • 1,154
  • Member since:
    12-09-2012
FCM 50 T ! Good tank if you want to loose for your team (unless ur unicorn who can make every trash work) or if you want to pretend you went back in time to IDK 2015 or something when this tank was still relevant. Like sure, back when there wasnt "class face class" thing in MM you can say its maybe not that bad (it is compared to X new premiums), but you log this and get matched against properly armored heavies. Best is when you get top tier MM against tier 6s, and there is just defender or VK 100 or another OP armored tank that will just smash half of your allies alone.

TigerMoth #46 Posted 24 June 2020 - 09:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 42732 battles
  • 926
  • Member since:
    04-04-2011

View PostSael_, on 24 June 2020 - 04:11 PM, said:

Please be mindful that not every tank has to be the best vehicle on the battlefield. :) There is a place for every machine. On top of that, there's various types of players out there, some of whom are of the collector kind and like to acquire tanks regardless of the performance.

 

View PostMisago, on 24 June 2020 - 04:27 PM, said:

 

Or, weird idea, the developers are supposed to make sure that there's a place for every tank in the game, and some aren't just blatantly OP (*cough*defender*cough*) while others aren't just pure misery to play (this thing, SuperPershing, T34, M3 Lee, 110, 121,japanese heavies, jpz 4, tons of light tanks, various Tier 10s...)

 

But I guess that's more work than just trying to turn one's failing as game developer into a endearing quality. Whatever works for you and your bank account, eh?

 

 

You seem to be overlooking that this tank fails to achieve mediocrity on the battlefield. As Misago writes, the devs should be ensuring all tanks have a place on the battlefield, especially if the player has spent real money on them.



L0rd_0f_War #47 Posted 24 June 2020 - 11:21 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14355 battles
  • 1,008
  • [-VIC-] -VIC-
  • Member since:
    08-17-2011

View PostSael_, on 24 June 2020 - 11:11 AM, said:

Please be mindful that not every tank has to be the best vehicle on the battlefield. :) There is a place for every machine. On top of that, there's various types of players out there, some of whom are of the collector kind and like to acquire tanks regardless of the performance.


At least you know the tank is garbage... which is why you are pushing it as a 'collector' item.... There is space between Best and junk... called somewhat competitive... like say T26E4 SuperPershing (decent tank for the gold value)... and then we have this outdated junk... worse than outdated T34 junk. Tanks like these are only good for 'collecting' dust in the Garage.



agemennon541 #48 Posted 24 June 2020 - 11:35 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 17099 battles
  • 26
  • [CURE] CURE
  • Member since:
    03-19-2013
NO

Alfa_Tau #49 Posted 25 June 2020 - 06:47 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17696 battles
  • 306
  • Member since:
    02-14-2015

View PostSael_, on 24 June 2020 - 05:11 PM, said:

Please be mindful that not every tank has to be the best vehicle on the battlefield. :) There is a place for every machine. On top of that, there's various types of players out there, some of whom are of the collector kind and like to acquire tanks regardless of the performance.

 

sorry but the idea that entering the battle with a vehicle which is already inferior to all others do not make me smile or wish to have it. This tank is coupled by MM by another Heavy that is going to be always better. 

 

FCM 50 t  is probably one of the oldest and clearly suffers in comparison to all new regular and premium entered in the game in more recent times: Therefore it would be a nice idea to buff a litte all these antiquites. 

 

In any case the description of the tank "play as Heavy or medium" it's misleading. This tank cannot play at all as a heavy- 



Echotun #50 Posted 25 June 2020 - 06:55 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 24554 battles
  • 1,318
  • [FA-1] FA-1
  • Member since:
    03-15-2015

View PostJin91, on 24 June 2020 - 06:22 AM, said:

Rare tank 


At least on the battlefield... :D
 



StronkiTonki #51 Posted 25 June 2020 - 07:38 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Clan Commander
  • 36211 battles
  • 1,510
  • [T0AST] T0AST
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011

View PostSael_, on 24 June 2020 - 04:11 PM, said:

On top of that, there's various types of players out there, some of whom are of the collector kind and like to acquire tanks regardless of the performance.

 

Translated:

"We know that there are people out there who buy premium tanks, even if they are garbage. So there's no need to buff them, WG gets money anyway."

Yeah, good job exploiting these players.



Miepie #52 Posted 25 June 2020 - 09:17 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 6361 battles
  • 2,393
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018
Maybe they should simply reclassify it as a Medium to at least mitigate the matchmaker. :popcorn:

Simona2k #53 Posted 25 June 2020 - 10:32 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 4523 battles
  • 1,296
  • [FOXZA] FOXZA
  • Member since:
    10-01-2017
Yes strong tank

Virusas #54 Posted 25 June 2020 - 11:39 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 19133 battles
  • 145
  • [ALTTD] ALTTD
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011
This thing is one of the purest examples(just like CDC) how wot meta has changed. It used to be close to decent tank maybe 5 years ago but now its just a pure garbage.
10:49 Added after 9 minute

View PostSimona2k, on 25 June 2020 - 10:32 AM, said:

Yes strong tank

And how can you even say that this is a good tank when you dont even have it? I would like to hear what good does this tank have in your opinion :) 


Edited by Virusas, 25 June 2020 - 11:49 AM.


Lanrefni #55 Posted 25 June 2020 - 01:11 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 39275 battles
  • 5,380
  • [THONK] THONK
  • Member since:
    09-15-2012

View PostMisago, on 24 June 2020 - 06:27 PM, said:

 

Or, weird idea, the developers are supposed to make sure that there's a place for every tank in the game, and some aren't just blatantly OP (*cough*defender*cough*) 

Defender isn't OP, just very good.

 

on topic:

oh look its' one of the premiums that received buffs to everything it didn't need, just like JT88.



vuque #56 Posted 25 June 2020 - 04:22 PM

    Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 19286 battles
  • 4,199
  • [TAF-G] TAF-G
  • Member since:
    08-05-2010

View PostoBmg, on 24 June 2020 - 09:19 PM, said:

 

Players have provided solid list of bad Premium tanks .Some tanks are debatable, but some are bad by almost a consensus.

There is no reason to sell (unchanged) bad premium tanks, to people ,for money , those   which majority of players  obviously consider bad.

This is payed masochism you are asking from us , and uneccessary liability that hurts relationship of players with the game.

 

 

 

If you don't like it, you don't have to buy it. Just because it is not your cup of tea, doesn't mean that someone else is not appreciating it. ;)



Ilija22 #57 Posted 25 June 2020 - 04:48 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 23816 battles
  • 7
  • [CROVS] CROVS
  • Member since:
    04-17-2011
Let's be real, it really sucks. Ammo rack is easily hit, gun is mediocre even for premium MM, it's a huge target, catches on fire almost every game, the armor is horrible and it gets artied to oblivion.

Misago #58 Posted 25 June 2020 - 07:35 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20998 battles
  • 128
  • Member since:
    04-21-2012

View Postvuque, on 25 June 2020 - 03:22 PM, said:

 

If you don't like it, you don't have to buy it. Just because it is not your cup of tea, doesn't mean that someone else is not appreciating it. ;)

Like Wargaming's bank account?



rimmer_the #59 Posted 25 June 2020 - 07:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3652 battles
  • 210
  • [H-F-T] H-F-T
  • Member since:
    04-21-2016

View PostL0rd_0f_War, on 24 June 2020 - 11:21 PM, said:


At least you know the tank is garbage... which is why you are pushing it as a 'collector' item.... 

A trash collector's item, learn to read between the lines :)

18:47 Added after 1 minute

View Postvuque, on 25 June 2020 - 04:22 PM, said:

 

If you don't like it, you don't have to buy it. Just because it is not your cup of tea, doesn't mean that someone else is not appreciating it. ;)

We're just warning other players, no need for a strawman. 



VanGore78 #60 Posted 25 June 2020 - 08:23 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 79099 battles
  • 231
  • Member since:
    06-22-2013

HOLD YOUR HORSES

 

"This hybrid tank easily falls in line with armored medium vehicles. Traits like high mobility, an accurate armament with a high rate of fire, and bouncy but not necessarily thick armor "

 

This is misleading at best. So it's not a question of "cup of tea" here. Calling its armor bouncy is a false information. It cant be compared or played as a heavy but it's gun is sub par compared to any more recent premium medium. The Progetto  46 eats this gigantic barn for breakfast.  You try to talk people into buying sub par products. The FCM used toi be one of the best prems, but now is a pile of HS. It's a collector's vehicle nothing else. So advertise as that

19:25 Added after 1 minute

Can't pen heavies and gets outgunned by mediums...YEAH a fine investment. 

 

EBRs enjoy the paper armor and huge silhouette too...

 

A PILE OF CRAP

19:34 Added after 10 minute

View Postvuque, on 25 June 2020 - 04:22 PM, said:

 

If you don't like it, you don't have to buy it. Just because it is not your cup of tea, doesn't mean that someone else is not appreciating it. ;)

[content removed]

 

I am sorry, nothing personal, but your stats make it hard to take your recommendations serious. 

 

Stat-shaming another player.

Post edited.

~MaxandChloe4ever, Forum Moderator


Edited by MaxandChloe4ever, 26 June 2020 - 09:25 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users