Jump to content


Match making still sucks


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2 replies to this topic

Devric #1 Posted 07 July 2020 - 05:23 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 28239 battles
  • 57
  • [HOT] HOT
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011

Haven't played for a couple of years, started playing again the other day hoping to see improements to the match maker. Nope, nothing has happened appearently. Just lost a battle 0-15. Checked every player's rating. This is what it looked like. Do I need to say that it's not fun to play battles like this? Losing OR winning team? If Wargaming spent 10% of the time they spend on adding premium content to the game on development on the match maker instead, we would have had a great match maker years ago. But since a good match maker doesn't generate Rubels like premium content do, we will never see a good match maker.

 

The numbers below are sorted from highest to lowest rating and do not match the order in the result lists. This way you can also see that every player on the winning team has a higher rating than the corresponding player on the losing team. With a player average of more than 1000 in higher, of course that team will win. 

 

Losing team Winning team
8147 9613
7421 7498
6036 (Me for you who are interested...) 7383
5803 7268
5440 6910
5075 5396
4028 5357
4003 5107
3681 5098
3609 4798
3525 4743
2823 3822
2564 3783
2419 2956
1633 2299
   
Total: 66 207 Total: 82 031
   
Average: 4 414 Average: 5 469

 

 

 

Attached Files

  • Attached File   2020-07-07 18_19_18-WoT Client.png   950K


Kdingo #2 Posted 07 July 2020 - 05:32 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 33415 battles
  • 9,084
  • Member since:
    07-05-2011
Now the big question, how does the pr rating "problem" turns out if you just compare platoons in each team?

Homer_J #3 Posted 07 July 2020 - 05:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Moderator
  • 33999 battles
  • 38,734
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
We have a great thread for matchmaking discussion.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users