Jump to content


Global Premium tank rebalance (incl. nerfs)

premium tank nerf

  • This topic is locked This is a poll-only topic
No replies to this topic

Poll: Balancing premium tanks (30 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Are you in favour of nerfing/balancing premium tanks?

  1. Yes, fully. (13 votes [43.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 43.33%

  2. Yes, partially. (3 votes [10.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  3. Yes, if compensation [of any type] is provided. (9 votes [30.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.00%

  4. No, other reason. (1 vote [3.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.33%

  5. No, never. (4 votes [13.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.33%

  6. Hard to say/Doesn't affect me. (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

How does your previous opinion reflect on vehicles such as the Defender, Leafblower, etc?

  1. They should be nerfed as any other vehicle. (22 votes [73.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 73.33%

  2. They should be left as is since they are premium tanks. (7 votes [23.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.33%

  3. Hard to say. (1 vote [3.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.33%

Do you believe game balance would be better if WG rebalanced premiums as though they were regular vehicles? (Ignoring what the law says about it)

  1. Yes, absolutely. (14 votes [46.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.67%

  2. Yes, in some cases. (11 votes [36.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.67%

  3. It won't have any effect. (4 votes [13.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.33%

  4. No, it would be worse. (1 vote [3.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.33%

  5. Hard to say. (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Would you continue to purchase premium vehicles if WG nerfed/rebalanced them?

  1. Yes, absolutely. (4 votes [13.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.33%

  2. Yes, in some cases. (10 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  3. No, this is a breach of trust. (8 votes [26.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.67%

  4. F2P, I do not buy premium vehicles. (2 votes [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

  5. Hard to say. (6 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

Finally, should premium vehicles be left untouched due to their status as as premium vehicles?

  1. Yes, aside improvements (buffs), premium vehicles should never be touched. (6 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. No, they should be rebalanced, buffed or nerfed as though they were standard vehicles (19 votes [63.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 63.33%

  3. I don't mind either way. (1 vote [3.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.33%

  4. Hard to say (4 votes [13.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.33%

Vote Hide poll

WindSplitter1 #1 Posted 12 July 2020 - 04:39 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 21925 battles
  • 4,247
  • [WINDY] WINDY
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

As it stands, premium tanks being nerfed became a hot topic as per the new patch.

 

Frankly, and despite owning both Prg. 46 and EBR 75, I don't mind but, it's a bit of a bad move from WG.

 

But the point here is, what about other tanks? Which are perceived to be as much of a problem as they are broken (leFH18B2), down tiered (Defender), better than TT counterparts (EBR 75), out of touch from their peers (IS-3A), overwhelmingly superior for their type (Obj.279e), redundant (Chi-Nu Kai or M4 variants) and reward tanks (T95/FV4201).

 


 

Meaning, what exactly is the general consensus about nerfing premiums?


Edited by WindSplitter1, 12 July 2020 - 07:01 PM.






Also tagged with premium, tank, nerf

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users