Jump to content


Update 1.10: Common Test 2 Has Started!


  • Please log in to reply
345 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 16 July 2020 - 06:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 34,824
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Try out the reworked Equipment 2.0 and take the new Polish mediums for a spin!

The full text of the news item

Galaxy_class #2 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13195 battles
  • 205
  • Member since:
    06-05-2015
Well including Equipment 2.0 was earlier than I expected and it may be unusual timing with Ranked at the moment but interesting none the less.

7thNighthawk #3 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:12 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29620 battles
  • 36
  • [LEOHQ] LEOHQ
  • Member since:
    01-04-2013

*
POPULAR

So the Italian tech tree gets nerfed but the overperforming Prem Progetto gets buffed - makes sense.

 

Oh and of course the belenced EBR 75 FL gets to be as broken as ever to outclass it's tech tree counterpart even more.

 

10/10 Weegee



ZDN #4 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:13 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30897 battles
  • 301
  • [-WTB-] -WTB-
  • Member since:
    12-14-2011

First i must say,slow for the turbo mode.Plus the 2 sec to change the mode is a bit long.But the low power makes the tank slow to gain speed.It is hard to get to the top speed easy,how a turbocharger works that instant boost and the extra power and torque you get.Not here.

 

Next to say the aim/dispersion is long,and bad.The gun is not that accurate,so the suport role of the tank is weak.The armor is paper on the hull so this is a suport,2 line/flanker. But the gun is not great.



gunslingerXXX #5 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:14 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 15314 battles
  • 4,648
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014

OMG you really listened to the whine threads and court threats? 

Please compare my CDC now to the BUFFED progetto! Thank you. 

WGbalance.jpg


Edited by gunslingerXXX, 17 July 2020 - 06:36 AM.


pihip #6 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:16 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17551 battles
  • 1,656
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013
So Progetto 46 gets a straight buff now. Sad.

I'm pretty disappointed WG bowed to the whining minority once again.

Edited by pihip, 16 July 2020 - 07:17 PM.


Koz23 #7 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:16 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28834 battles
  • 112
  • Member since:
    07-05-2011
So now the progetto has a free'ed up slot to equip even more stuff... and the panhard is gonna still roll like a headless chicken. Not gonna lie, i had hopes for these changes to affect these overperforming vehicles, but oh well.. money talks.

PathfinderII #8 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:18 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 53914 battles
  • 55
  • Member since:
    07-08-2012

"Please share your thoughts regarding these announced changes."

How about you stop introducing OP premium tanks, so you/we won't have issues later? Yes, Prog is much better then the Pantera, Ebr is much much better then Linx.( there are too many players that want to play only the broken tanks) Now ofc the difference will be more significant. Sure, why the eff not?

I didn't read anything after that of this updates, but I commented a while ago about the new polish meds that the premium one will be way better then the tech tree tanks (it was an early Spoiler), prove me wrong WG! But you can't, cause there's a pattern here.

Edit: Re-balance PROPERLY all the tanks, before you add/change equipments. Make  EBR even more broken with some add-ons...


Edited by PathfinderII, 16 July 2020 - 07:21 PM.


pmakins #9 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:18 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 51508 battles
  • 564
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    10-17-2010
There is no need for buffing progetto, just let it keep the rammer! If you buff the reload you are just letting progetto another equipment slot for free basically!

Also, if they are op, stop selling them, or if you nerf them, expect refunds! :P

Edited by pmakins, 16 July 2020 - 07:19 PM.


bgjudge #10 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:20 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30233 battles
  • 230
  • Member since:
    02-11-2012

Lets nerf the tech tree tanks and BUFF the premium tanks....you almost got me back with the TEST 1. Luckily for me I didnt installed your pay to win game again. Ty for TEST 2 information. You saved me alot of time and nerves! 

I will still lurk in the shadows for POSETIVE changes #justJoking 

:coin::coin::coin::coin::coin:

:coin::coin::coin::coin::coin:

money money money...you can buy friends, women and ...everything.



Weak_man #11 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:22 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9670 battles
  • 1,500
  • [AMURG] AMURG
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017

Played 2 battles with progetto 65 with full bond equipment (vents instead rammer), food, 5 crew skill, all max out  and is nerfed to the ground, it is trash, garbage. Leo 1 and STB is a beast compared to this progetto.

Gun handling is not amazing now in live server but in test server is bad. Reload of 3'th shell more than 10 seconds, wow.

Only masochist will play this progetto.

 

18:24 Added after 1 minute

View PostKoz23, on 16 July 2020 - 08:16 PM, said:

So now the progetto has a free'ed up slot to equip even more stuff... and the panhard is gonna still roll like a headless chicken. Not gonna lie, i had hopes for these changes to affect these overperforming vehicles, but oh well.. money talks.

No, without rammer and with this gun handling is garbage



NekoPuffer_PPP #12 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:24 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 37324 battles
  • 5,589
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

*
POPULAR

WG, you've made the wrong decision.

 

You should have kept the Progetto and EBR nerfed as originally proposed.

 

By doing this, you allow the inconsiderate, greedy players to dominate the battlefield in their overpowered premium tanks.

 

You just gave us all proof that you will listen to those who want/like and pay for game-breaking vehicles, while simultaneously ignoring the sensible among us.

 

You are responsible for your game's future...it's not heading in the correct direction.

 

Reconsider your decisions, or they may lead you to failure.



Fallxx #13 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:26 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 20408 battles
  • 9
  • [LABE] LABE
  • Member since:
    01-12-2013

i was hopefull when i saw the first testing being done for 1.10

 

but i was being blinded by so mutch hope, that i forgot to realise this is still WG and always will be.

this progetto and EBR crapis just another dagger in the back all those loyal fans who day in day out keep putting up with this crap.

 



Weak_man #14 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:27 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9670 battles
  • 1,500
  • [AMURG] AMURG
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017
If it is a must gun handlind nerf is enough for progetto 65 but without rammer it becomes unplayable
18:30 Added after 3 minute
Why progeto 65 and standard b doesn't keep standard reload time of standard gun rammer like progetoo 46 ?

domnulrazvan #15 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 30133 battles
  • 231
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015
Nothing about the cap bonds limit on tanks ? What a shame

Yaccay #16 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:30 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 37390 battles
  • 2,574
  • [4TL] 4TL
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012

WG, this is a new low.

This is worse than was before the suggested change.

The tech tree  Italian line will be nerfed, while the premium Progetto will get a buff (because now Progetto can mount +1 equipment as Progetto get the rammer free!)

In reality Progetto was the best tank (most overperforming?) among the other Italian tanks.



Weak_man #17 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:34 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 9670 battles
  • 1,500
  • [AMURG] AMURG
  • Member since:
    12-31-2017

View PostYaccay, on 16 July 2020 - 08:30 PM, said:

WG, this is a new low.

This is worse than was before the suggested change.

The tech tree  Italian line will be nerfed, while the premium Progetto will get a buff (because now Progetto can mount +1 equipment as Progetto get the rammer free!)

In reality Progetto was the best tank (most overperforming?) among the other Italian tanks.

 

And what will do this progetoo 46 in tier 10 ?



gunslingerXXX #18 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:34 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 15314 battles
  • 4,648
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
:izmena:
18:34 Added after 0 minute

View PostWeak_man, on 16 July 2020 - 07:34 PM, said:

 

And what will do this progetoo 46 in tier 10 ?

What will it do against tier 6!!!???

 

Tier [edited]SIX!?+?!



pihip #19 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:35 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17551 battles
  • 1,656
  • Member since:
    01-11-2013

View PostWeak_man, on 16 July 2020 - 07:22 PM, said:

Played 2 battles with progetto 65 with full bond equipment (vents instead rammer), food, 5 crew skill, all max out  and is nerfed to the ground, it is trash, garbage. Leo 1 and STB is a beast compared to this progetto.

Gun handling is not amazing now in live server but in test server is bad. Reload of 3'th shell more than 10 seconds, wow.

Only masochist will play this progetto.

 

Do you need 0.01 dispersion, 4k base DPM and 0.5 aim time to consider a tank good?

Progetto 65 is what it should've been from day one, and even with these nerfs it's still better in most regards compared to BatChat and TVP.

You can't have autoloader AND good soft stats at the same time.



Saitama_en_tanque #20 Posted 16 July 2020 - 07:36 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26627 battles
  • 273
  • [STEGO] STEGO
  • Member since:
    12-13-2015
All the community begging to nerf some premium tanks and they buff they... only WG can be so blind...

Edited by Saitama_en_tanque, 16 July 2020 - 07:38 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users