Jump to content


The End of Freely Demountable Equipment


  • Please log in to reply
83 replies to this topic

Poll: Do you agree with WG making it cost 10 gold or a demounting kit to remove the Binocs, Camo Net and Tool Box from a vehicle? (224 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Do you agree with WG making it cost 10 gold or a demounting kit to remove the Binocs, Camo Net and Tool Box from a vehicle?

  1. Yes (25 votes [11.16%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.16%

  2. No (199 votes [88.84%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 88.84%

Vote Hide poll

will0hlep #1 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:06 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13435 battles
  • 117
  • [TD_UK] TD_UK
  • Member since:
    10-19-2017
Poll

Yaccay #2 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:07 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 37369 battles
  • 2,573
  • [4TL] 4TL
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012
WG really went to the wrong direction ...

will0hlep #3 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:11 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13435 battles
  • 117
  • [TD_UK] TD_UK
  • Member since:
    10-19-2017
We need to make some noise that the player base don't want this change

hjorte #4 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:25 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23210 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014
I don't care what WG do anymore.

NekoPuffer_PPP #5 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:28 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 37293 battles
  • 5,547
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

View Postwill0hlep, on 31 July 2020 - 03:11 PM, said:

We need to make some noise that the player base don't want this change

 

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

 

Was that good enough? :teethhappy:

 

Seriously, WG's decisions as of late have been...a mixed bowl of fruit. Most of them, rotten.



Galaxy_class #6 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13013 battles
  • 160
  • Member since:
    06-05-2015
As I mentioned in another thead, it only takes 3 seconds for your crew to mount a camo net in battle but in the garage they seem to have real trouble removing it from the tank without some kind of Gold bribe. :trollface: Maybe it's a union thing.

Balc0ra #7 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:39 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 77944 battles
  • 23,776
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Well, it's kinda silly on camo net. But at the same time binocs do cost 500 000 on a tier 1 as it did on a tier X today. Netx patch it's 50 000K on a low tier  and 600 000K on a tier 8+. So for me when they cost 50K. I don't mind mounting one permanent vs moving the few I had around between all my active tanks. 

NicoPudel04 #8 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:41 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 3559 battles
  • 96
  • Member since:
    10-29-2019

View Postwill0hlep, on 31 July 2020 - 03:11 PM, said:

We need to make some noise that the player base don't want this change

 

Unfortunately english language CC's have been very dissapointing as of late with breaking news like this.



NekoPuffer_PPP #9 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:50 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 37293 battles
  • 5,547
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

So from what I can see in the article, the equipment will now be more expensive, and the 3 "starter" pieces of equipment, advised to be used by free-to-play players because of their demountable nature, will now require 10 gold for demounting...

 

Also, not all pieces of equipment will be sent to the depot, no, you'll have to earn the ability to do so with demounting kits, and even then you will not have enough for each tank.

 

Wargaming, I seriously have to wonder now...what are you smoking? Can we have some?

 

It's become blatantly obvious that I'll never have my answer, and we'll never be able to make a change by complaining about it on the forums...their staff reads the forums but just simply ignores any feedback which disagrees with their decisions.

 

They just don't care about us anymore...it's time to leave the game and let it die. This is coming from someone who has been actively following the game's development and feature implementation over the past 7 years, and only wanted the best for the game, suggesting new features, content, etc...

 

When a company stops listening to their customers, is when you should stop supporting them, because they are not working on the game for your sake, but rather, for their own ideals, because they think they know what's better...life has taught me that is a guaranteed dead end. We as a species would not have come far if we relied on ourselves alone. We're here because we trust others, rely on others, and their help and suggestions.


Edited by NekoPuffer_PPP, 31 July 2020 - 03:50 PM.


will0hlep #10 Posted 31 July 2020 - 03:56 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13435 battles
  • 117
  • [TD_UK] TD_UK
  • Member since:
    10-19-2017

Please vote on the poll at the top and leave your comment, the more activity this thread gets the more chance there is that WG will have to change their minds

 



qpranger #11 Posted 31 July 2020 - 04:02 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38889 battles
  • 7,016
  • [HAMMY] HAMMY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View Posthjorte, on 31 July 2020 - 05:25 PM, said:

I don't care what WG do anymore.

 

Amen!

I am just sitting comfortably with plenty paprika-flalvoured crisps 

and occasional hysterical giggles, 

watching their greed- and arrogance-infused endspiel unfold.



hjorte #12 Posted 31 July 2020 - 04:09 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23210 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View Postqpranger, on 31 July 2020 - 04:02 PM, said:

 

Amen!

I am just sitting comfortably with plenty paprika-flalvoured crisps 

and occasional hysterical giggles, 

watching their greed- and arrogance-infused endspiel unfold.

 

Sour cream chips and Pepsi coke here. And Formula 1 practise.



BravelyRanAway #13 Posted 31 July 2020 - 04:12 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 25894 battles
  • 13,956
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010
It's a bad idea. WG will force F2P players to grind credits to equip each tank that needs a camo or binos....it's another credit sink to slow progression up the tech tree.

qpranger #14 Posted 31 July 2020 - 04:38 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38889 battles
  • 7,016
  • [HAMMY] HAMMY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View Postwill0hlep, on 31 July 2020 - 05:56 PM, said:

Please vote on the poll at the top and leave your comment, the more activity this thread gets the more chance there is that WG will have to change their minds

 

To change one's mind one needs to have it.



Randomar #15 Posted 31 July 2020 - 04:57 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32240 battles
  • 375
  • Member since:
    10-18-2015

In another thread was suggested that we could pay the price of 10 gold, converted to silver, to remove the equipment or for a disassembly kit.

 

I have voted for no.



Boris_Kiril99 #16 Posted 31 July 2020 - 04:59 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 30090 battles
  • 59
  • [BGFRC] BGFRC
  • Member since:
    09-04-2014
I'm curious who and more interestingly why, would someone give ''YES'' to the poll question XD

will0hlep #17 Posted 31 July 2020 - 06:47 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13435 battles
  • 117
  • [TD_UK] TD_UK
  • Member since:
    10-19-2017
If WG want more money from the player base there are better ways to do it than forcing us to pay 10 gold to move binocs. Making general improvements to the game's balance and adding new feature will attract more players and therefore more revenue.

Infryndiira #18 Posted 31 July 2020 - 06:50 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24487 battles
  • 497
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    09-20-2013
Unpopular opinion, but - considering Binoculars and Camo Nets will now consist of 3 classes like other equipment types, with most out of these six pieces being cheaper than the current costs (including a downright bargain at 50.000 for tiers II through IV) the ability to dismount those for free becomes next to irrelevant; especially considering how few higher-tier vehicles are inherently dependent on them to be considered "optimally equipped".

will0hlep #19 Posted 31 July 2020 - 07:13 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 13435 battles
  • 117
  • [TD_UK] TD_UK
  • Member since:
    10-19-2017
TBH i'm against the classes for the binocs as well. lowering the cost of binocs is good, spliting up types of equipment that were simple is just stupid.

Edited by will0hlep, 31 July 2020 - 07:14 PM.


Hedgehog1963 #20 Posted 31 July 2020 - 08:05 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 59033 battles
  • 7,951
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011
I wasn't even ware this was on the cards.  Terrible for new players.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users