Jump to content


Game's direction with each patch?

game gameplay

  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

Poll: WoT today's meta and recent game development (72 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battle in order to participate this poll.

Are you content with the today's WoT?

  1. Yes (19 votes [26.39%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 26.39%

  2. No (53 votes [73.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 73.61%

Vote Hide poll

stormermp #1 Posted 06 August 2020 - 10:54 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 54520 battles
  • 304
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    03-12-2014
Are you content with the direction,decision making and state of gameplay(meta) implemented with each recent patch?please share your thoughts why are you happy with the game.If you are NOT you don't have to write anything because i know all to well the faults and flaws of todays meta and decision making policies in-game developed by WG balance and game management teams.

Edited by stormermp, 06 August 2020 - 10:55 AM.


Kdingo #2 Posted 06 August 2020 - 10:59 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 33570 battles
  • 9,194
  • Member since:
    07-05-2011

I just play for fun, i don´t care anymore. If i feel like it i play if i don´t then... i just don´t play.

They could pull the plug on the servers and i wouldn´t really shed a tear.

Off course that also means my interest to spend a dime on the game is pretty much non existent, but that´s hardly something i would consider an issue.



Draakard #3 Posted 06 August 2020 - 11:00 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23886 battles
  • 413
  • Member since:
    07-29-2013

The strategy is to reduce the number of EU players so they may merge EU1 and EU2 into one server.

 

I would say the strategy is working well at the moment....


Edited by Draakard, 06 August 2020 - 11:00 AM.


hedi2222 #4 Posted 06 August 2020 - 11:29 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 36757 battles
  • 7,892
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    08-12-2013

View PostDraakard, on 06 August 2020 - 10:00 AM, said:

The strategy is to reduce the number of EU players so they may merge EU1 and EU2 into one server.

 

I would say the strategy is working well at the moment....

I hope you didn't forget your tinfoil hat while writing that.



qpranger #5 Posted 06 August 2020 - 11:36 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38889 battles
  • 7,456
  • [HAMMY] HAMMY
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
I am not happy having to wait long for Frontline.

UserZer00 #6 Posted 06 August 2020 - 12:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15180 battles
  • 1,440
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013
1) Shiny new equipment to see discussions and youtube videos about

2) The normal round of complaints on the forum to provide lunchtime reading

3) No real impact on how I play the game (for fun)

Could they have handled the Progetto and bond changes better? Sure

Could they have waited longer for equipment changes? Sure

Could they have focused on other things instead?  Sure

Do I care about the impact this will have on my games?  No.

All in all, was fun before is still fun now.

Fun fun fun



SlyMeerkat #7 Posted 06 August 2020 - 01:25 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21910 battles
  • 3,980
  • [TC_HF] TC_HF
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Id say im more inbetween, like sure they have made dodgy decisions but also they have done good ones and to be fair, the game was a lot worse at start of its life compared to now..... I think for most its the fact they dont like change and/or are demanding to much for it to all be done in one go, things take time in that regard.

UserZer00 #8 Posted 06 August 2020 - 01:48 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15180 battles
  • 1,440
  • Member since:
    03-05-2013

View PostSlyMeerkat, on 06 August 2020 - 01:25 PM, said:

Id say im more inbetween, like sure they have made dodgy decisions but also they have done good ones and to be fair, the game was a lot worse at start of its life compared to now..... I think for most its the fact they dont like change and/or are demanding to much for it to all be done in one go, things take time in that regard.

Or they think something must be wrong with the game when

- they aren't on the winning team 55-100% of the time each and every day

- Rng only does bad things to them

- 100% of the shots fired by the enemy team hit and penetrate

- WG has secretly implemented code to target individual players, making the experience better for paying players

 

If the time spent on complaining about the game and creating new "theories" as to why the game hates them was instead put into learning the mechanics....



hjorte #9 Posted 06 August 2020 - 02:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24634 battles
  • 580
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014
I don't care what WG do anymore.

ZlatanArKung #10 Posted 06 August 2020 - 02:07 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 1537 battles
  • 6,555
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
I really don't care anymore.

If WG closed servers tomorrow, I wouldn't mind at all.
WG have successfully killed all my interest and hopes that this game would be good and live up to its potential.

So I play once in a while if I have a nice toon. Otherwise I don't, which also means I have 0 interest in spending money on the game.

Snagfang #11 Posted 06 August 2020 - 03:01 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18956 battles
  • 235
  • Member since:
    09-06-2011

I've become quite apathetic towards it all tbh. 
I used to be quite passionate about it, but I've learned the error of my ways; WG couldn't care less what we think.

I still play, and just ignore the changes as much as I can. If they eventually reach the point where it just becomes too frustrating to play I'll just stop.
I'll continue to play, but I won't invest anymore money in it unless there is a distinct change in WG policies toward the player base and the game direction.



shikaka9 #12 Posted 06 August 2020 - 04:12 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 81273 battles
  • 2,997
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013

View PostDraakard, on 06 August 2020 - 10:00 AM, said:

The strategy is to reduce the number of EU players so they may merge EU1 and EU2 into one server.

 

I would say the strategy is working well at the moment....

 

it should be already enough to do this before christmas :)



SlyMeerkat #13 Posted 06 August 2020 - 04:35 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 21910 battles
  • 3,980
  • [TC_HF] TC_HF
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013

View Posthjorte, on 06 August 2020 - 01:00 PM, said:

I don't care what WG do anymore.

Im starting to get that way and its a shame, i do still love and enjoy this game but nowadays, its more meh than anything sadly.

 

View PostSnagfang, on 06 August 2020 - 02:01 PM, said:

I've become quite apathetic towards it all tbh. 
I used to be quite passionate about it, but I've learned the error of my ways; WG couldn't care less what we think.

I still play, and just ignore the changes as much as I can. If they eventually reach the point where it just becomes too frustrating to play I'll just stop.
I'll continue to play, but I won't invest anymore money in it unless there is a distinct change in WG policies toward the player base and the game direction.

Same here tbh, i have cut back on the money i put into the game which was quite a bit back when but now, just premium account and gold here and there, no way as much as i used to.



hjorte #14 Posted 06 August 2020 - 05:08 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 24634 battles
  • 580
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View Posthjorte, on 06 August 2020 - 02:00 PM, said:

I don't care what WG do anymore.

 

View PostSlyMeerkat, on 06 August 2020 - 04:35 PM, said:

Im starting to get that way and its a shame.

 

It's a natural reaction for me, when someone ignores you forever, never acknowledges anything you suggest, never engages in objective debate and do questionable things repeatedly.

I walk away. I protect myself from the agony of dismissal, which will eventually kill my passion for the game and set me free.



Bordhaw #15 Posted 06 August 2020 - 07:29 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 16834 battles
  • 5,840
  • Member since:
    01-29-2017

View PostDraakard, on 06 August 2020 - 10:00 AM, said:

The strategy is to reduce the number of EU players so they may merge EU1 and EU2 into one server.

 

I would say the strategy is working well at the moment....


Yes as this was "the biggest" patch ever and the 10 year anniversary but both servers managed only 31,000 players when only a week or two before it was 90,000 



24doom24 #16 Posted 06 August 2020 - 07:42 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 9801 battles
  • 2,297
  • [WW3] WW3
  • Member since:
    10-20-2012

I find my self playing less and less every year. It's pretty obvious now WG wants to speed this game up as fast as possible to appeal to fortnite/FPS players. I would not be surprised in the slightest if WG lowered the battle timer from 15 minutes to 10 before 2021. 

 

This game is a far cry from the one I started playing and loved in 2012-2016. 9.17 was the last 'good' patch in this game, everything after was mostly downgrade/damaging. The server numbers reflect that precisely, loads of players left after 9.18 and subsequently wheelies and other stupid additions and changes to this game by WG. Tier 10 was in a way better spot back then with the 907 being the only 'OP' reward vehicle (ironically if you look at tanks GG the 907 got buffed at patch 9.18 lmao)

 

 


Edited by 24doom24, 06 August 2020 - 07:45 PM.


no_human #17 Posted 06 August 2020 - 08:23 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 43185 battles
  • 79
  • Member since:
    08-17-2013

 

on the forum I see a funeral attitude
what WG doesn't understand is that, you can't have fun at the funeral



Kdingo #18 Posted 06 August 2020 - 08:31 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 33570 battles
  • 9,194
  • Member since:
    07-05-2011

View Postno_human, on 06 August 2020 - 08:23 PM, said:

 

on the forum I see a funeral attitude
what WG doesn't understand is that, you can't have fun at the funeral

 

Funeral attitude is the norm, it sometimes switches to world war declaration attitude but its just temporary. That said you have to also keep in mind that the forum here is just a very small portion of the playerbase so not necessarily an indication for anything or representative of the playerbase as a whole. The silent majority is known for having deep rooted masochistic needs that only a proper sadistic wg patch can please.

 

Oh and you can have fun on a funeral, haven´t had one that didn´t end in laughter at least partially.



Gruff_ #19 Posted 07 August 2020 - 04:03 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 27201 battles
  • 3,005
  • [B-2-K] B-2-K
  • Member since:
    09-22-2011

There is an increasing P2W element that I don't like, too many enhanced bits and bobs that push the effect of skill gaps further apart.

 

Balance decisions take far too long to implement and are often ill thought out.



Mikanoid #20 Posted 07 August 2020 - 04:09 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 8410 battles
  • 366
  • [COBRA] COBRA
  • Member since:
    11-05-2018

View Postno_human, on 06 August 2020 - 08:23 PM, said:

 

on the forum I see a funeral attitude
what WG doesn't understand is that, you can't have fun at the funeral

Depends who has died really

 

If WGs inching towards a heavily micro transaction business model does finally kill the game off I for one will be having LOADS of fun at that particular funeral :)







Also tagged with game, gameplay

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users