Jump to content


AMX Cda 105: Damage Right on Target


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 02 September 2020 - 06:00 AM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 35,396
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Keep hidden with the AMX Canon d'assaut 105 until it is time to strike!

The full text of the news item

Bluster40 #2 Posted 02 September 2020 - 06:14 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 5314 battles
  • 39
  • [RNRS] RNRS
  • Member since:
    04-09-2012

looks like trash week party,

 

do not buy this



_Old_Spice_ #3 Posted 02 September 2020 - 06:43 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 42713 battles
  • 442
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011
Take it from referral program, it can earn credits with 260 pen standard shells...but to buy - no!

wsatnutter #4 Posted 02 September 2020 - 06:51 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27812 battles
  • 10,575
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
for collectors only I imagine

sir_alex_ice #5 Posted 02 September 2020 - 07:10 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 39536 battles
  • 519
  • [T-7-T] T-7-T
  • Member since:
    05-16-2014

Again with the lies and [edited], WG just can't stop:

- it is not stealthy as it is spotted a lot, even when it is in bush

- it is not a sniper as it will not hit the target half of the time, will just go in the dirt

- when it does hit the target it will ricochet, not pen or just "critical hit" with 0 damage

- its armor is a joke, almost never bounces any shots, its a miracle when it does

- good speed, good mobility maybe compared to the TOG II

- the gun arc is abysmal making it very hard to aim at moving targets and switch between different targets

 

Then only real good thing about it is the very high speed of the shell.



Badz360 #6 Posted 02 September 2020 - 07:40 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26264 battles
  • 520
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

Are you sure you are talking about the correct tank Alex? I think that's an overly bleak assessment of this tank. It is mobile (top speed 55kph, 26 hp/t), good standard pen (260) and fairly accurate (0.30 stock). It all comes at the price of armour - but you should be at the back in this, not brawling.

Very similar to the KanonJpz 105 - stay invisible or be prepare to be insta-deleted.



BicicletaDeRazboi #7 Posted 02 September 2020 - 07:44 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 35324 battles
  • 109
  • Member since:
    12-29-2011

Man, people post so much hate on these tank offers.
Just reading the comments above everyone shits on the tank with the hope that WG buffs it.

But then if WG buff it they will post hate that WG is selling OP premiums to powercreep techtree tanks and older prem tanks...

Can't win with you guys. 

 

 

 

 

 


Edited by BicicletaDeRazboi, 02 September 2020 - 07:44 AM.


Badz360 #8 Posted 02 September 2020 - 07:53 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26264 battles
  • 520
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostBicicletaDeRazboi, on 02 September 2020 - 07:44 AM, said:

Man, people post so much hate on these tank offers.
Just reading the comments above everyone shits on the tank with the hope that WG buffs it.

 

 

 

Not everyone :P



7th_Brigade #9 Posted 02 September 2020 - 08:09 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 86209 battles
  • 410
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014
EBR

DK_TORBEN #10 Posted 02 September 2020 - 08:18 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 53442 battles
  • 19
  • Member since:
    08-16-2015

Dont buy this crap TD...

 



O_o_Babbuino #11 Posted 02 September 2020 - 08:22 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 45369 battles
  • 629
  • [SCOBA] SCOBA
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011

Thing is, these articles are written by someone who just read the stats from a paper.

 

And with no experience from playing the game.

 

You can always say:

 

Precise gun - sniper/sharpshooter/marksman = better than average

Fast - lightning/nimbus3000/traitorswift = better than average

Armor - fortress/impenetrable/bulletproof/impervious/wallrus = better than average

Camo - invisible/stealth/unseen = better than average

All-rounder - universal/all-in-one = mediocre

 

The best tank is an arty:

precision - hits even when it doesn't.. and one shot can hit many

camo - almost always stays invisible

armor - shoots from behind a rocky mountain

all-rounder - just click - very easy to handle

 

Looking forward to an arty offer...

 

"105 leFH18B2"

 

Collector's purpose of course

 

with some epic 3D style...would love that WG 

 

 

 

 

 



Morgan_the_Reaper #12 Posted 02 September 2020 - 08:23 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 87315 battles
  • 842
  • [H-0-F] H-0-F
  • Member since:
    07-09-2013
If you want a similar td buy wz120 .

Unicorn_of_Steel #13 Posted 02 September 2020 - 08:29 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22288 battles
  • 854
  • [R_D_A] R_D_A
  • Member since:
    12-29-2017

View PostCommunity, on 02 September 2020 - 06:00 AM, said:

Keep hidden with the AMX Canon d'assaut 105 until it is time to strike

 

Seems like correct advertisement. Just stay hidden untill detected than it's "3 strikes-out". Oke, bad joke.... 



Badz360 #14 Posted 02 September 2020 - 08:37 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26264 battles
  • 520
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostMorgan_the_Reaper, on 02 September 2020 - 08:23 AM, said:

If you want a similar td buy wz120 .

 

WZ is turretless - that's about where the similarities end.

 

Top speed - 55 vs 50

Power to weight - 26 vs 16

Stock accuracy - 0.30 vs 0.37

Standard pen - 260 vs 248

Standard shell velocity - 1,525 vs 1,000

Stock camo - 21 vs 23

Armour - paper vs good armour/angle

Traverse - 29 vs 43

 

AMX outshines in most departments - however the last 2 in particular mean the WZ is a much more forgiving tank to play.

 


Edited by Badz360, 02 September 2020 - 08:41 AM.


BSHDBCG #15 Posted 02 September 2020 - 09:39 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 7079 battles
  • 1,231
  • Member since:
    04-20-2015
There is a reason to as why they aren't seen often in the game.

sammygo #16 Posted 02 September 2020 - 09:46 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14487 battles
  • 176
  • Member since:
    11-17-2018
#WalletClosed

Morgan_the_Reaper #17 Posted 02 September 2020 - 10:44 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 87315 battles
  • 842
  • [H-0-F] H-0-F
  • Member since:
    07-09-2013

View PostBadz360, on 02 September 2020 - 07:37 AM, said:

 

WZ is turretless - that's about where the similarities end.

 

Top speed - 55 vs 50

Power to weight - 26 vs 16

Stock accuracy - 0.30 vs 0.37

Standard pen - 260 vs 248

Standard shell velocity - 1,525 vs 1,000

Stock camo - 21 vs 23

Armour - paper vs good armour/angle

Traverse - 29 vs 43

 

AMX outshines in most departments - however the last 2 in particular mean the WZ is a much more forgiving tank to play.

 

Really you think amx better ? The wz eat it for breakfast. I have both , love the Chinese and hate the French . And after all you can bully low tier tanks and even same tier with trollish gameplay. And try to flank wz , it turns like med .



Badz360 #18 Posted 02 September 2020 - 10:54 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26264 battles
  • 520
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

No - I didn't say AMX is better - it's just a different style of gameplay, so didn't agree it was similar.

With the armour and traverse speed - you can use the WZ up close if needed, but it's accuracy isn't great for red-line sniping. The AMX is snipe and run type of play and can quickly change positions/flanks depending on the situation.

 

Haven't played the AMX that much - but I see it as quite similar to the KanJpz 105.



Anymn #19 Posted 02 September 2020 - 10:56 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21553 battles
  • 494
  • [RHPA] RHPA
  • Member since:
    07-06-2011

View PostBadz360, on 02 September 2020 - 08:37 AM, said:

 

WZ is turretless - that's about where the similarities end.

 

Top speed - 55 vs 50

Power to weight - 26 vs 16

Stock accuracy - 0.30 vs 0.37

Standard pen - 260 vs 248

Standard shell velocity - 1,525 vs 1,000

Stock camo - 21 vs 23

Armour - paper vs good armour/angle

Traverse - 29 vs 43

 

AMX outshines in most departments - however the last 2 in particular mean the WZ is a much more forgiving tank to play.

 

 

If you make a comparison like this, also take into account the stats where the WZ is better.

 

390 vs 440 damage

11.5s vs 9.8s reload time

2034 vs 2693 DPM

18 vs 20 reverse speed.

 

Having armor and a massive higher DPM makes the difference for the WZ. WZ can be somewhat agressive using it's armor, while the AMX has to snipe from the back with meh alpha and terrible DPM. WZ has something to scare other tanks with, while an AMX can pull of a single shot and then will be slaughtered.

 

 

 

 



Sturmi_0545 #20 Posted 02 September 2020 - 11:26 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 45093 battles
  • 596
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    02-24-2011

View PostUnicorn_of_Steel, on 02 September 2020 - 07:29 AM, said:

 

Seems like correct advertisement. Just stay hidden untill detected than it's "3 strikes-out". Oke, bad joke.... 

"Stay hidden inside your garage until it's time to strike Alt-F4 after a long day of tank spinning and avoiding battle".






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users