Jump to content


Toxic WoT

gameplay unbalanced unplayable

  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

stormermp #41 Posted 16 October 2020 - 12:21 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 55318 battles
  • 338
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    03-12-2014

View PostGodTank2, on 16 October 2020 - 11:02 AM, said:

play another 10k games and come tell us how crapthe game is

 Ok buddy pal friendo,If the game lasts that long because been playing less and less just as the MAJORITY of currently existing player base which is dwindling and decreasing with WG not doing nothing to control it and just keep releasing new premium tanks as they do:harp: Good Riddance.



GodTank2 #42 Posted 16 October 2020 - 12:42 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 12547 battles
  • 1,269
  • [RDDT] RDDT
  • Member since:
    12-14-2012

View Poststormermp, on 16 October 2020 - 02:21 PM, said:

 Ok buddy pal friendo,If the game lasts that long because been playing less and less just as the MAJORITY of currently existing player base which is dwindling and decreasing with WG not doing nothing to control it and just keep releasing new premium tanks as they do:harp: Good Riddance.

3 million players have played the game this week on EU+RU while there is no major events going on. Keep telling yourself that.



stormermp #43 Posted 17 October 2020 - 12:11 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 55318 battles
  • 338
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    03-12-2014

View PostGodTank2, on 16 October 2020 - 11:42 AM, said:

3 million players have played the game this week on EU+RU while there is no major events going on. Keep telling yourself that.

Post it where you got those info.As far as i keep a watch on these things NA is on life support,EU is deteriorating and on RU is not much better,in fact RU player base is even more harsh and critic towards their incompetence and display their discontent quite often.



TheGreatGazoo #44 Posted 17 October 2020 - 12:17 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 40270 battles
  • 179
  • Member since:
    10-16-2012

View PostPrivate_Miros, on 15 October 2020 - 10:39 AM, said:

 

It would also mean that the most frustrated class of players (slightly over average ones, that know they play well, but feel they are hampered by bad teams the most, as they lack the skill to work with or past them in most occasions as the better players do) would become the new 42%er, as they'd only meet better players in their team and on the enemy team.

 

Not sure that consistently having them do 300 damage per game and dying is something that would help their enjoyment of the game.

 

You need bad players for an average player to be average.

I would argue that bad players make everybody look like better players and everybody's numbers would drop without them. You can't tell me that "bad players" haven't helped your stats....



Private_Miros #45 Posted 17 October 2020 - 12:35 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 31915 battles
  • 13,177
  • [EMU87] EMU87
  • Member since:
    07-09-2011

View PostTheGreatGazoo, on 16 October 2020 - 11:17 PM, said:

I would argue that bad players make everybody look like better players and everybody's numbers would drop without them. You can't tell me that "bad players" haven't helped your stats....

 

I don't think good players would be affected much. The majority (75-80%) is average. Removing the bottom 10 is hurting the lower half of that middle section more than it does the top 10%.

 

But yes, if you take everyone away but the good players, obviously you get the same effect.







Also tagged with gameplay, unbalanced, unplayable

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users