Jump to content


Performance Rating

Random battles

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Paulo_Lion_Heart #1 Posted 05 December 2020 - 01:11 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28765 battles
  • 133
  • Member since:
    05-12-2012

How random battles classification really works?

 

 

shot_003.jpgshot_004.jpg



SovietBias #2 Posted 05 December 2020 - 01:24 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 41852 battles
  • 2,107
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013

Well, you do get less XP for shooting lower tiers - which I am assuming you did - and also for shooting at targets you are not spotting yourself, which is quite comon with Strv (and TD's in general)..

 

That said, AMX 49 XP score is strange, as it seems they have not:

 

1) done any damage

2) spotted enemies 1st

3) assisted (tracking/spotting) others getting damage

4) scored any kills

5) made any base defence/capture assist

 

which pretty much means they did absolutely nothing. They shot 4 times at something, failed to pen, and got shot 4 times back to garage. No idea why they should get more XP, even if you spent your match camping redline shooting at tanks 2 tiers lower.

 

 


Edited by SovietBias, 05 December 2020 - 01:26 AM.


Paulo_Lion_Heart #3 Posted 05 December 2020 - 01:31 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28765 battles
  • 133
  • Member since:
    05-12-2012
I shoot one time one tier 8 and one in tier 10, the rest in tier 9

BR33K1_PAWAH #4 Posted 05 December 2020 - 06:47 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 11207 battles
  • 3,360
  • [AAV] AAV
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

XP distribution strikes again! :teethhappy:

 

But to be fair, XP is not a performance metric. WN8 is.



Famepackexe #5 Posted 05 December 2020 - 09:46 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 55924 battles
  • 1,129
  • [FARMS] FARMS
  • Member since:
    09-07-2014
Next time try not to shoot something :teethhappy:On a side note that is really strange that he got more xp and did 0 

SovietBias #6 Posted 05 December 2020 - 11:17 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 41852 battles
  • 2,107
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013

View PostBR33K1_PAWAH, on 05 December 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

XP distribution strikes again! :teethhappy:

 

But to be fair, XP is not a performance metric. WN8 is.

 

Average XP would be a pretty good performance indicator, if WG had not decided to include premium account bonus from the start.



BR33K1_PAWAH #7 Posted 05 December 2020 - 12:01 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 11207 battles
  • 3,360
  • [AAV] AAV
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View PostSovietBias, on 05 December 2020 - 01:17 PM, said:

 

Average XP would be a pretty good performance indicator, if WG had not decided to include premium account bonus from the start.

Yeah, it's ok on average but battles like one OP had do happen and xp reward there makes absolutely no sense.

Also, why even look at average xp when you already have wr?



NekoPuffer_PPP #8 Posted 05 December 2020 - 12:03 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38386 battles
  • 6,213
  • [VRTC] VRTC
  • Member since:
    09-13-2013

He hit all 4 of his shots. Presumably all were fired at a tier 10 tank since they all bounced. Despite doing literally nothing other than dying, he (I assume) engaged a tier 10 vehicle and halted its advance briefly, which I guess the game rewards as an honorable sacrifice...plus, he did it at close range, unlike you.

 

Oh wait, I just noticed you're in a tier 10 vehicle, while he's in a tier 8.

 

Yeah. That explains everything. Lower tier tanks in a battle earn a lot more XP.



Paulo_Lion_Heart #9 Posted 05 December 2020 - 01:30 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28765 battles
  • 133
  • Member since:
    05-12-2012

 I believe the damage should be the most important, if you are spotting and nobody hit that target, what matter your spotting?

 

Is the damage that put end of battle! 



StahlWotan #10 Posted 05 December 2020 - 01:45 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1062 battles
  • 46
  • Member since:
    11-27-2018

View PostPaulo_Lion_Heart, on 05 December 2020 - 01:11 AM, said:

How random battles classification really works?

 

 

Like any other feature in this fraudgame: "randomly", affected by 'privileged' and 'non-privileged'  team bonuses set in server. 



SovietBias #11 Posted 05 December 2020 - 02:07 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 41852 battles
  • 2,107
  • Member since:
    06-10-2013

View PostBR33K1_PAWAH, on 05 December 2020 - 11:01 AM, said:

Yeah, it's ok on average but battles like one OP had do happen and xp reward there makes absolutely no sense.

Also, why even look at average xp when you already have wr?

 

Platoons, mostly. That's why people went through a lot of work to come up with performance ratings, the last being WN8 (and an experimental version of WN9).



BR33K1_PAWAH #12 Posted 05 December 2020 - 02:14 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 11207 battles
  • 3,360
  • [AAV] AAV
  • Member since:
    04-11-2018

View PostSovietBias, on 05 December 2020 - 04:07 PM, said:

 

Platoons, mostly. That's why people went through a lot of work to come up with performance ratings, the last being WN8 (and an experimental version of WN9).

Hm, makes sense.



Paulo_Lion_Heart #13 Posted 05 December 2020 - 03:09 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 28765 battles
  • 133
  • Member since:
    05-12-2012

I believe Wargaming will change something in classification. This today not only affect xp and credits, affects other things like points for Battle Pass Season, Bounds, and maeby other's.

 

I hope they review this! 


Edited by Paulo_Lion_Heart, 05 December 2020 - 03:10 PM.






Also tagged with Random battles

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users