Jump to content


Team Clash 2021: And the Winner Is…


  • Please log in to reply
110 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 08 February 2021 - 01:40 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 37,193
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Find out who took the crown in Team Clash 2021 and led their followers to victory and exclusive rewards!

The full text of the news item

__CaNo__ #2 Posted 08 February 2021 - 01:54 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14470 battles
  • 41
  • [TSTW] TSTW
  • Member since:
    01-06-2018
It was a disaster experience for me as I was in Orzanel'e team. 2 out of 10 battles were lost and even Orzanel did not pay enough attention for his own team. For instance, he was not online yesterday night for activating perk.

I really regret to choose Orzanel, he is not even give a ... for his team. Please be advised to select more responsible and proper contributers next year.

As for the event in general, what we need is to find a balance to make battles more balanced in terms of player abilities. Otherwise, I will wait next year to join a team 4 days after seeing who is leading. Please do not provide nonsense advices the commander you wish to for bla bla bla.

Any news for frontline yet? And ranked battles as well. Thanks!

Morgan_the_Reaper #3 Posted 08 February 2021 - 01:55 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 90681 battles
  • 936
  • [WIPED] WIPED
  • Member since:
    07-09-2013

Good event bad picking team system .

If you need to make it fair next time add a system that add +1 player to other teams 

Lets say if somebody pick Dakillzor then the system need to auto add +1 player to other teams 

with that you will have equal player pool for each team.

If you see the number of players in every team now you will see that 50% was in Dakillzor team , 20 in Circon and the rest two get 15% of player base each.

So how you can win if other teams have double or triple amount of battles ?


Edited by Morgan_the_Reaper, 08 February 2021 - 01:56 PM.


Machiavelli_13 #4 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:11 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 29175 battles
  • 112
  • [GIMB] GIMB
  • Member since:
    03-17-2018
Do use guys know when we will receive the commander.

ehabmhg #5 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:14 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29902 battles
  • 8
  • [N5BH] N5BH
  • Member since:
    11-09-2012

Is there a way to get more detailed statistics about the teams?

(like no. of players per team, no. of games, win % percentage of games, ........)



edevjoe #6 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:16 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 7823 battles
  • 89
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    02-12-2015

View PostMachiavelli_13, on 08 February 2021 - 02:11 PM, said:

Do use guys know when we will receive the commander.

Lol have you read the article before posting ? It will be credited before February 9th at 14.00 CET ( UTC+1) along with any unclaimed personal l and team achievements

 



Elite_DK #7 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:21 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 73414 battles
  • 44
  • [VKFDK] VKFDK
  • Member since:
    08-02-2014
Finally this crap, is over...

7thNighthawk #8 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:21 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 31949 battles
  • 95
  • [LEOHQ] LEOHQ
  • Member since:
    01-04-2013

I really really like the 7v7 format as maps lose a bit of the corridor feeling and your contributions have an impact way more regularly than in 15v15; the games feel way more dynamic with more tactics being able to pay off.

 

I was Team Daki and I'll fully admit that, unlike last year where I chose Skill because it was the only guy I knew, I only selected it because I did not feel like getting stomped by clan wars participants that are often specialised on focus fire, dynamic deployment and often times spam gold left and right.

 

The system is indeed bad, as Morgan_the_Reaper stated.

Since Daki teams were almost always the opponent of the other teams, they had way more possibilities to win points for the team, even if they had lost a lot - which they did not until the end of the event where only the slowpokes had to finish farming. Add to that the demoralisation when you not only constantly lose but see your team fall further and further behind and I can see that it was a highly frustrating experience for the last teams.

 

I don't know how to fix all of this but there is no mechanic that deals with highly stacked teams in this mode. There will always be one contributor who will be backed by the majority even before the event starts and you can be 100% sure that they will win - especially since once they start winning, late joiners will always select them too and add to the snowball effect.

This also leads to Daki platoons having to wait ages to get into a game unless the played arty, ironically but that's really a first world problem in that scenario.

 

I just hope that 7v7 for lesser rewards will see a return without fixed teams so that I can enjoy a more balanced version of this refreshing mode that is the only way I enjoy playing Tier 10 - even despite the EBR cancer.



Dru_UK #9 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:26 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9395 battles
  • 601
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    01-02-2013

A better way to score would to keep people personal mission levels and points the same as this system, but change the 'team poimts' the reflect the percentages of the players playing, therefore the team with the most players have a reduced team income, whilst those people on the lower number teams can get a modifier - or a bigger reward pot of credits and days premiums etc... (or that everyone gets the 1 skill commander and that the prixe in that respect is equal)

 

Anyhow - first year i did it - allowed me to play a few different T10's  (as I only own one) and really enjoyed it. thanks



Tancificatorul #10 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:31 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 23337 battles
  • 4
  • [BM_RO] BM_RO
  • Member since:
    02-23-2013
I wanted to reach level 10 to get a least the cammo but seeing that I have to play 30-40 games per level, which most of them felt disappointing, I gave up somewhere at lvl7 :))

blindhai #11 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33357 battles
  • 585
  • [EU-FI] EU-FI
  • Member since:
    06-02-2011

View PostCanoTheViper, on 08 February 2021 - 02:54 PM, said:

It was a disaster experience for me as I was in Orzanel'e team. 2 out of 10 battles were lost and even Orzanel did not pay enough attention for his own team. For instance, he was not online yesterday night for activating perk.

I really regret to choose Orzanel, he is not even give a ... for his team. Please be advised to select more responsible and proper contributers next year.

 

Orzanel is known for not giving anything for anything...



leamael #12 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:44 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 53657 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    08-16-2015

It's kind of  sarcastic to congratulate the first team for their "great result" when this was purely based on a design flaw of the whole event...

 

Let me explain: for the first 5 days of the event the teams 2, 3 and 4 would exclusively play against team 1. This means that team 1 would have 3 times more games than team 2, 3 and 4. The result of this flaw was that team 1 would get 3 times more points than the other teams per evening. So it's no wonder that team 1 had the same amount of points than team 2, 3 and 4 combined....

 

In mathematical terms: WG forgot to normalize the results of each team by the amount of games the team played. So it's no wonder that the team with the most games won the event... 

 

 



kaneloon #13 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:56 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 34574 battles
  • 5,272
  • Member since:
    11-18-2011
Or just block the possibility to join the #1 team once the event starts.

_Saqis64_GR_ #14 Posted 08 February 2021 - 02:59 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 100174 battles
  • 149
  • [G_U_N] G_U_N
  • Member since:
    04-09-2013

1. Ι would like to have the opprotunity to get all commanders somehow.

2. The team/point system is wrong. You hyped about Daki so most of players pic his team.



tonifalck123 #15 Posted 08 February 2021 - 03:07 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25640 battles
  • 21
  • [EDITS] EDITS
  • Member since:
    07-24-2011

View PostTancificatorul, on 08 February 2021 - 03:31 PM, said:

I wanted to reach level 10 to get a least the cammo but seeing that I have to play 30-40 games per level, which most of them felt disappointing, I gave up somewhere at lvl7 :))

There were missions for random battles that you could complete every day that gave you almost a single stage 51/70.


Edited by tonifalck123, 08 February 2021 - 03:09 PM.


Zamieszki #16 Posted 08 February 2021 - 03:10 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11230 battles
  • 684
  • Member since:
    12-17-2012

View Postkaneloon, on 08 February 2021 - 02:56 PM, said:

Or just block the possibility to join the #1 team once the event starts.

 

You can pick whatever team you want before the event starts.

After it starts nobody can join any team for ~2h.

After these ~2h teamless players can only join the team which is last.

 

That would make things more interesting.



Rkrustnesis #17 Posted 08 February 2021 - 03:12 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 41697 battles
  • 76
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View PostCanoTheViper, on 08 February 2021 - 02:54 PM, said:

It was a disaster experience for me as I was in Orzanel'e team. 2 out of 10 battles were lost and even Orzanel did not pay enough attention for his own team. For instance, he was not online yesterday night for activating perk.

I really regret to choose Orzanel, he is not even give a ... for his team. Please be advised to select more responsible and proper contributers next year.

 

I was in Circon team and he also did not care about Team Clash .

 

In general Team Clash was complete disaster . Who ever came with idea giving rental tanks for players who don't have tier 10 should be fired by WG . If u see in your team 2+ rental tanks u know u lost already . Also tanks like B-chat 25t ,Strv 103B , FV4005 , TVP 50/51 , T62A , Progetto 65 , Jagdpanzer E 100 , Leopard 1 , Grille 15 should be banned in next Team Clash . Have many times my team lost because some 45% tomato did take something like Leopard 1 or Grille 15 :facepalm:

Main problem with contributors was WG choose them not players . Whats the point of that ? On Ru servers players did vote who will play in Team Clash . So any streamer who was in Team Clash was responsible in front of his own subscribers . On EU servers WG did choose 4 as*hol*s who did not give a f*ck about Team Clash . 

Team Clash needs more incentive to play after 10 level and 30 level . 


Edited by Rkrustnesis, 08 February 2021 - 03:18 PM.


Denton_0451 #18 Posted 08 February 2021 - 03:19 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27997 battles
  • 1,991
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011

View Posttonifalck123, on 08 February 2021 - 03:07 PM, said:

There were missions for random battles that you could complete every day that gave you almost a single stage 51/70.


Only on the last three days. Before that the daily missions were available only once per day giving you 17 points each day.



tonifalck123 #19 Posted 08 February 2021 - 03:22 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 25640 battles
  • 21
  • [EDITS] EDITS
  • Member since:
    07-24-2011

View PostDenton_0451, on 08 February 2021 - 04:19 PM, said:


Only on the last three days. Before that the daily missions were available only once per day giving you 17 points each day.

I thought i was dumb for not noticing they were complete-able 3 times a day, anyway i did the final sprint to 10 in the last day.



mynameispuffs #20 Posted 08 February 2021 - 03:23 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30718 battles
  • 5,884
  • [RGN] RGN
  • Member since:
    02-29-2012

View PostRkrustnesis, on 08 February 2021 - 02:12 PM, said:

 

I was in Circon team and he also did not care about Team Clash.

He was online every day (afaik), and there was ALWAYS a boost running :hiding: 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users