Jump to content


Wargaming, stop lying


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
14 replies to this topic

Rallief #1 Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:28 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4183 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011


Now listen to what he says at 0:26.

I think now we all know there is no such thing as a balancer in this game. Usually one team is much stronger than the other one. Now this is not another whine topic. I am asking Wargaming: why are you lying to us? Why are you saying there is thing like a "balance system"?

I know I will probaly get this topic closed and recieve a warning or a ban. But if you really want to show you're a game worth paying for you give me a honest answer or at least apologize to the community, because I don't think it's good to give people false information. You want people to pay for this game? Just add a balancer. The game will be twice as fun and you don't have to lie anymore. I am not the only one having problems with this. Everywhere I go I notice people lose the fun of this game, because the victor is frequently decided by luck.

VVere #2 Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:33 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 10378 battles
  • 493
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
There is the occasional complete f*ckup of the matchmaker but overall it's quite ok balanced. What matchmaking does not account for, is the level of human stupidity and utter lack of remote signs of intelligence you can meet in this game - but that's hardly the matchmaker's fault..

Dr_Nooooo #3 Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:35 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 13211 battles
  • 1,415
  • Member since:
    07-19-2010
There is no lie in the video, this topic makes no sense.

saml6131 #4 Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:38 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 8559 battles
  • 3,821
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Here is a good example of a really unlucky game from my team's behalf. Just to prove your point, we did lose the game but hey, its a game.

nemrod #5 Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:45 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19486 battles
  • 649
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011
"occasional" f***up? dont make me laugh, almost every game now is imbalanced - like 5 x T9 vs 3 x T9 or 4 x T8 vs 7 x T8, there are plenty of screenshots on forums if you dont believe

i remember that before 0.7 patch, balance (at least regarding tier equalness) was way better

EDIT: screenshot above my post is the perfect example of hilarious balance...

Aqarius #6 Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:56 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 11182 battles
  • 2,507
  • Member since:
    03-11-2011
I find this relevant: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=8r1CZTLk-Gk

admiralbismarck #7 Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:03 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22625 battles
  • 141
  • Member since:
    10-27-2011
If your read in the wot wiki how a MM works you can see how its sometimes that one team is "stronger" than the other one.
It looks at tiers not on the basic strength of the tank, sec it doesn't look if a tank is fully upgraded or not.
I agree that MM sometimes let me laugh alot but there are matches where we were much weaker (armor cannon heavy/med ) but we still won.

and I agree they would find a more advanced MM but I read they are working on that, It was canceld in 7.1 because off errors and it would take to long to make a match (wich people would be mad about)

so I don't agree that wargaming is lying to us

admiralbismarck #8 Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:08 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22625 battles
  • 141
  • Member since:
    10-27-2011

View Postsaml6131, on 13 January 2012 - 10:38 PM, said:

Here is a good example of a really unlucky game from my team's behalf. Just to prove your point, we did lose the game but hey, its a game.

if you look there are 4KV but 2 of them are platoon same for top2 on the other side. so don't realy find this a good example.
I know couple off people who use platoon to have better fight one uses a high and other as low as possible min. tier3 so the one with high has 80% chance on a battle were he is in top 5

Rallief #9 Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:40 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4183 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View Postsaml6131, on 13 January 2012 - 10:38 PM, said:

Here is a good example of a really unlucky game from my team's behalf. Just to prove your point, we did lose the game but hey, its a game.
It's an example, but I over 50% of my matches are worse balanced. Only yesterday I made around 15 print screen like these. I played 18 matches yesterday. If only this forum allowed me to upload more than 28.89kB...

Rallief #10 Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:41 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4183 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View PostDr_Nooooo, on 13 January 2012 - 10:35 PM, said:

There is no lie in the video, this topic makes no sense.
Your arguments are very strong sir...  :D

Rallief #11 Posted 23 January 2012 - 04:44 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4183 battles
  • 60
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011
Dear Wargaming,
It was my understanding that I asked you something.
Now I don't know how things go in Russia, but where I live if someone asks you anything it is polite te respond to that person. I thought that was pretty common in most countries but I guess it isn't.

shiftypowers2002 #12 Posted 23 January 2012 - 05:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 11555 battles
  • 1,024
  • [MIS] MIS
  • Member since:
    06-28-2011

View PostRallief, on 23 January 2012 - 04:44 PM, said:

Dear Wargaming,
It was my understanding that I asked you something.
Now I don't know how things go in Russia, but where I live if someone asks you anything it is polite te respond to that person. I thought that was pretty common in most countries but I guess it isn't.


Personally i find you as mad as a box of rabid badgers!!!

But that doesn't in anyway mean i dislike you or that your a bad person. :Smile_harp:

Infact some of my best acquaintances are a sandwich short of a picnic!! :Smile_great:

Jukelo #13 Posted 23 January 2012 - 05:23 PM

    Colonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 26487 battles
  • 3,608
  • Member since:
    08-13-2010
I doubt WG has time to lose answering to angry kids making baseless claims.

Cpl_Hicks #14 Posted 23 January 2012 - 05:31 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26586 battles
  • 365
  • Member since:
    06-12-2011

View PostRallief, on 23 January 2012 - 04:44 PM, said:

Dear Wargaming,
It was my understanding that I asked you something.
Now I don't know how things go in Russia, but where I live if someone asks you anything it is polite te respond to that person. I thought that was pretty common in most countries but I guess it isn't.
You are posting this on a forum and are not communicating with Wargaming.net directly. Expecting them to read your post is expecting them to read every single thread in every single subforum here. Sounds unlikely, doesn't it?
If you really wanted to ask Wargaming.net, you should've contacted the support service.

deamy #15 Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:39 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 10731 battles
  • 1,913
  • Member since:
    12-22-2010
Game-balancer. Yeah, right..




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users