Jump to content


An actually detailed poll about crew 2.0 (v2)

poll crew2.0 opinion

  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

Poll: Crew 2.0 (v2) Opinion Poll (169 members have cast votes)

What is your general opinion on crew 2.0 (v2)?

  1. Negative about every aspect. (51 votes [30.18%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 30.18%

  2. Negative about most aspects. (81 votes [47.93%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 47.93%

  3. Positive about most aspects. (29 votes [17.16%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 17.16%

  4. Positive about every aspect. (4 votes [2.37%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.37%

  5. Indifferent. (4 votes [2.37%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.37%

What is your opinion on the single commander system?

  1. Positive (49 votes [28.99%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 28.99%

  2. Needs improvements. (37 votes [21.89%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 21.89%

  3. Negative (83 votes [49.11%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 49.11%

What is your opinion on the instructor system?

  1. Positive (17 votes [10.06%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.06%

  2. Needs improvements. (27 votes [15.98%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 15.98%

  3. Negative (125 votes [73.96%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 73.96%

What is your opinion on the situational crew skills?

  1. Positive (18 votes [10.65%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.65%

  2. Needs improvements. (44 votes [26.04%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 26.04%

  3. Negative (107 votes [63.31%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 63.31%

What is your opinion about the talents?

  1. Positive (18 votes [10.65%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.65%

  2. Needs improvements. (41 votes [24.26%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 24.26%

  3. Negative (110 votes [65.09%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 65.09%

Are you happy with the proposed solution to compensate the 0-skill perks?

  1. Yes (65 votes [38.46%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 38.46%

  2. No (104 votes [61.54%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 61.54%

Do you think the conversion from old crew to new is fair?

  1. Yes (43 votes [25.44%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 25.44%

  2. No (126 votes [74.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 74.56%

Do you think the elite progression system is good?

  1. Yes (12 votes [7.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.10%

  2. It needs balancing. (32 votes [18.93%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 18.93%

  3. No (125 votes [73.96%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 73.96%

Do you feel like your crews will perform the same as in the old system?

  1. Yes (34 votes [20.12%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 20.12%

  2. No (135 votes [79.88%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 79.88%

Are you happy about the 3 crew skills you get for free?

  1. Yes (93 votes [55.03%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 55.03%

  2. No (it should be none) (51 votes [30.18%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 30.18%

  3. They should (instead) be only X and Y. (25 votes [14.79%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.79%

Do you think the costs for crew training are fair? (credits)

  1. Yes (23 votes [13.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 13.61%

  2. No (121 votes [71.60%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 71.60%

  3. Only if you can retrain for multiple vehicles at once. (25 votes [14.79%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.79%

Do you think the costs for crew training are fair? (XP)

  1. Yes (15 votes [8.88%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.88%

  2. No, it should be a fixed amount instead. (38 votes [22.49%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 22.49%

  3. No, it should be less but still proportional to the skill level. (60 votes [35.50%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 35.50%

  4. No, for other reasons. (56 votes [33.14%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 33.14%

Do you think the new interface is an improvement over the old one?

  1. Yes (62 votes [36.69%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 36.69%

  2. No (107 votes [63.31%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 63.31%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

carpy30 #21 Posted 25 July 2021 - 07:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 62919 battles
  • 165
  • [-WW] -WW
  • Member since:
    09-15-2013

you still that WG care about our opinion about everthing... hahahaha, they will do it anyway...

communuty say fix MM, balance MM... and wg saym, we hvve no time for that we haet to thing how to f up game more, whe have do new premium tank... no time for fix game...



duijm #22 Posted 26 July 2021 - 06:19 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 57386 battles
  • 3,306
  • [RANGX] RANGX
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View PostSosnowy_, on 19 July 2021 - 08:38 PM, said:

nice poll

 

for me 2 questions are missing:

- do you think that games will be more balanced with Crew 2.0? (less 15-1, 1-15 games)?

  • yes,
  • I dont know
  • no - there will be less balance in the games

- do you think that you will need to pay more to be competitive?

 

 

Totally silly questions with clear answers :P.  very clear that it will give less balance with players with 100% crews and players with OP crews. 

It is just more pay to win in every way.

 

17:22 Added after 3 minute

View Postarjun69, on 23 July 2021 - 10:53 AM, said:

i cant take the " all negative" votes serious.

you guys really are against 100% crews, sixt sense and sound detection for all?

But do we need crew 2.0 to get that?      Not really.

This new format just sucks and is much to complicated.   Simple is better.


Edited by duijm, 26 July 2021 - 06:23 PM.


Horcan #23 Posted 30 July 2021 - 06:48 AM

    The Great Hunter

  • Player
  • 67874 battles
  • 640
  • [2NRGY] 2NRGY
  • Member since:
    01-30-2011
Even if i dont want it ( have 500 crews to recheck ) and probably a lot of other people dont want it, your poll doesnt really matter. We are getting this shoved up our throats no matter what, because they invested a lot in it and even if mostly negative feed back , they may rebalance it a bit but it will hit live servers  even if we like it or not.

5everin #24 Posted 31 July 2021 - 08:02 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 81267 battles
  • 1,721
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View PostHorcan, on 30 July 2021 - 06:48 AM, said:

Even if i dont want it ( have 500 crews to recheck ) and probably a lot of other people dont want it, your poll doesnt really matter. We are getting this shoved up our throats no matter what, because they invested a lot in it and even if mostly negative feed back , they may rebalance it a bit but it will hit live servers  even if we like it or not.


You will like it, WG will tell you that you do. They will pull a number well over 50% out their .... and tell you that percentage of 'players' love it.

 

[ I exclude myself as I stopped playing this travesty a while ago and just come here to watch the dumpster burn]


Edited by 5everin, 31 July 2021 - 08:19 PM.


DmitrijLawrinienko #25 Posted 01 August 2021 - 09:16 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 10116 battles
  • 22
  • Member since:
    04-22-2012

Crew 2.0 is nothing but just another disgraceful and disgusting run on a bank. 

Check this out:

 

 

I cannot agree more with QB. 

Take your time, watch the video till the end and you will quickly realize how much pay to win this game will become.

The game will change in to massive gindfest that is deliberately so long to push many of you to use your wallets. 

WG could fix the MM, or arty missions, improve RNG or other stuff that many players are begging for years, but no. 

They will do something that no one was asking for as fixing the game doesn't bring more money. 

Honestly WG ..i. ..i.


Edited by DmitrijLawrinienko, 01 August 2021 - 09:24 AM.


Covenant_R #26 Posted 01 August 2021 - 09:58 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16284 battles
  • 120
  • [HAKOO] HAKOO
  • Member since:
    05-21-2015

View PostDmitrijLawrinienko, on 01 August 2021 - 09:16 AM, said:

Crew 2.0 is nothing but just another disgraceful and disgusting run on a bank. 

Check this out:

 

Watching QB video he said he did a poll where 88% of the players did not even own a 6 skill crew. On any tank. In the next minute he then complains that his 4 skill crew won’t be competitive because it will go up against other players in level 80 crew all the time, which in fact, he just basically proved that at at least no one in his community actually has. And it will cost so much credits per commander that no one will be able to afford buying their way there either. Especially not more then a single tank. So he’s slanting worst case scenarios to his own agenda very heavily.

 

Why not check a bit more non clickbaity and more comprehensive coverage that doesn’t only focus on a specific perceived issue. 

 

https://pr154wot.wixsite.com/pr154/post/sandbox-crew-2-0-remastered

 


Edited by Covenant_R, 01 August 2021 - 10:00 AM.


arjun69 #27 Posted 03 August 2021 - 08:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 115260 battles
  • 951
  • [ARJ] ARJ
  • Member since:
    11-29-2012
the sheep here following their cc masters are quite disgusting sometimes

HouseofChaos #28 Posted 04 August 2021 - 08:04 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14577 battles
  • 3
  • [B00TA] B00TA
  • Member since:
    06-23-2015
I invested quite a lot of gold -and thus "real" money- in my crews. Is Wargaming going to refund me for that ? I mean, I renamed several crew members, gave them a different look... and paid real money for it. Now they will disappear. I want my money back !

I like the way the crew system works right now. You start as a newbie and every new crew in a new tank will be less efficient than old hands, that's a simple fact of life. But I noticed that many gamers don't seem to like reality intruding upon their make believe worlds: they don't care that simple physics are negated in this game, that historical accuray takes back seat to make place for make believe paper tanks, and that "leveling the game for all" (I read that someplace) is simply bovine excrement... there are always going to be players who are absolutely the best in terms of motoric skills, reaction speed and sheer talent whereas players like me (partly disabled, causing -amongst other things- a reaction speed that is overtaken by glaciers while they honk their horns happily) will always suffer from a physical disadvantage. A new crew won't make you or me play better against unicums, you know. They will enjoy the same "benefits" from the new system like all of us, in case you didn't notice.

Why this sudden focus on the crew system now ? Isn't everybody screaming for a better matchmaking system ? Why is Wargaming breaking a system that works and ignoring other glaring deficiencies in the game ?

Covenant_R #29 Posted 04 August 2021 - 08:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16284 battles
  • 120
  • [HAKOO] HAKOO
  • Member since:
    05-21-2015

View PostHouseofChaos, on 04 August 2021 - 08:04 AM, said:

Why this sudden focus on the crew system now ? Isn't everybody screaming for a better matchmaking system ? Why is Wargaming breaking a system that works and ignoring other glaring deficiencies in the game ?

Crew system rework was on the map and talked about in a Q&A with Devs in 2018 already, most likely it was put on lower priority compared to a lot of other changes and only now was in line to get worked on. When everyone starts screaming about something, anything being worked on is still months, if not half a year away unless its immediately broken, like some bugs that came after some changes.

 



5everin #30 Posted 04 August 2021 - 09:46 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 81267 battles
  • 1,721
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View PostCovenant_R, on 04 August 2021 - 08:54 PM, said:

Crew system rework was on the map and talked about in a Q&A with Devs in 2018 already, most likely it was put on lower priority compared to a lot of other changes and only now was in line to get worked on. When everyone starts screaming about something, anything being worked on is still months, if not half a year away unless its immediately broken, like some bugs that came after some changes.

 


They promised a gold ammo rework in 2018/2019 for before 2020 .... still waiting, Exploiting money form people is much more important.


Edited by 5everin, 11 August 2021 - 08:00 PM.


nc30_guy #31 Posted 09 August 2021 - 05:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30052 battles
  • 628
  • Member since:
    12-23-2011

People struggle with what we have now adding the hassle of crew 2.0 will just put even more people off the game the simple current system is good and a minor interface change is all that was ever needed.

They would have to be stupid to push this out its not needed and was not asked for there are far more pressing issues to fix in the game than adding this mess to it.

For me personally I am having a extended break from this game due to its terrible gameplay since Equipment 2.0 was launched and this break will be permanent if crew 2.0 is launched.


Edited by nc30_guy, 09 August 2021 - 05:24 PM.


Covenant_R #32 Posted 13 August 2021 - 09:09 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 16284 battles
  • 120
  • [HAKOO] HAKOO
  • Member since:
    05-21-2015

View Postnc30_guy, on 09 August 2021 - 05:23 PM, said:

People struggle with what we have now adding the hassle of crew 2.0 will just put even more people off the game the simple current system is good and a minor interface change is all that was ever needed.

They would have to be stupid to push this out its not needed and was not asked for there are far more pressing issues to fix in the game than adding this mess to it.

For me personally I am having a extended break from this game due to its terrible gameplay since Equipment 2.0 was launched and this break will be permanent if crew 2.0 is launched.

Current system is, always was, and will continue to be... crappy, its neither simple nor fine until you are done learning all the ins and out of it. I still stand by my list on page 1 in this thread regarding crew 1.0.


 

View Post5everin, on 04 August 2021 - 09:46 PM, said:


They promised a gold ammo rework in 2018/2019 for before 2020 .... still waiting, Exploiting money form people is much more important.

Well, they did rework gold ammo and had it on sandbox, at the same time as they had an HP and HE rework as well... HP boost to mid tier tanks was implemented, but the rest of that solution was by far not good enough, and rightly so that rework was pulled due to community feedback. But of the sandboxes we have gotten now, several are pieces of that old big rework that failed, hence why I hope they will return to premium ammo next year now when HE and SPG is done.



5everin #33 Posted 17 August 2021 - 11:21 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 81267 battles
  • 1,721
  • [TEC] TEC
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011

View PostCovenant_R, on 13 August 2021 - 09:09 PM, said:

Well, they did rework gold ammo and had it on sandbox, at the same time as they had an HP and HE rework as well... HP boost to mid tier tanks was implemented, but the rest of that solution was by far not good enough, and rightly so that rework was pulled due to community feedback. But of the sandboxes we have gotten now, several are pieces of that old big rework that failed, hence why I hope they will return to premium ammo next year now when HE and SPG is done.

They didn't touch gold. They boosted standard round damage and tank hp. Effectively nerfing gold. (damage wise)

As I remember it. The change above though needing work was pretty well recieved. WG then threw in a completley broken HE mechanic out of the blue and called the whole thing a failure when players hated the HE change.

 

Ps. On them returning to the gold ammo rework. Don't hold your breath.

 


Edited by 5everin, 17 August 2021 - 11:48 PM.






Also tagged with poll, crew2.0, opinion

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users