Jump to content


New to the Supertest: KV-1 Screened and T3 Convertible

supertest KV-1 T3 Screened

  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

HeatResistantBFG #1 Posted 19 August 2021 - 09:40 AM

    English Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 2640 battles
  • 356
  • [KOYO] KOYO
  • Member since:
    04-03-2013
Hey Tankers!
 
We have two vehicles that will soon head to the Supertest:
  • KV-1Sh
  • T3 Convertible

 

WoT_leak_Т3-Convertible_eng.jpg  WoT_leak_KV-1-Screened_eng.jpg

 
The KV-1Sh is a Tier V Soviet heavy tank. It looks like the familiar KV-1, but with additional screens on the turret and hull. It carries a 76mm F-32 gun with an accuracy of 0.51, an aiming time of 2.9s, and a reload time of 3.9s. Penetration is 120mm with a standard APCR shell, and 150mm with a special APCR shell. The damage per shot is 110HP.
 
One of the tank's distinctive features is its durability. It has 950HP, which is the highest value for its tier. The thickness of the frontal armour plate reaches up to 75 mm and the frontal projection of the turret is up to 90mm.
 
Engine power is 500 h.p. and the top speed of the vehicle is 30km/h. All this makes the KV-1Sh is a classic close-range Soviet heavy tank.
 
The T3 Convertible is a Tier III American medium tank. Equipped with a 37mm automatic gun with 2 containers, each shot fires 4 shells, it has an accuracy of 0.51, a full reload time of 12s, and an aiming time of 2.5s. Penetration is 48mm with the standard AP shell, and 70mm with the special APCR shell. The damage per shot is 40 HP.
 
You can fill in the forms to help give us more feedback on these tanks :)
T3 Convertible Form - LINK
KV-1 Screened Form - LINK


saxsan4 #2 Posted 19 August 2021 - 11:15 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 32376 battles
  • 8,857
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

T3 convertable need normal single shot gun, autolder is too weak 

 

Can we get option to have it whelled and on tracks?

 

THANK YOU  for these two REAL tanks


Edited by saxsan4, 19 August 2021 - 11:37 AM.


will0hlep #3 Posted 19 August 2021 - 11:20 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20028 battles
  • 232
  • [TD_UK] TD_UK
  • Member since:
    10-19-2017
Well these tanks are pretty weak, I mean I suppose that atleast means they won't screw the meta of tier III and V
10:21 Added after 1 minute

Why is the feedback form just asking us where we saw the tanks first and not any actual questions about the tanks?



Geno1isme #4 Posted 19 August 2021 - 11:24 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 51617 battles
  • 13,781
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

So you now constantly start with retarded balance numbers to make it appear as if feedback is actually incorporated when you tweak them closer to the actually intended values?

That KV-1 variant is literally worse in EVERY aspect than the regular KV-1 with the F-30. 0.51 dispersion and 2.9s aimtime for 110 damage? Heck even a fully stock KV-1 is better except for the penetration.

Who had the brilliant idea to add a second decimal digit to the armor values of the T3? And will be fun to fight Matildas, Somuas and Hetzers with that gun.

 

At least add some real questions to the feedback form to maintain that illusion.


Edited by Geno1isme, 19 August 2021 - 11:37 AM.


HeatResistantBFG #5 Posted 19 August 2021 - 11:55 AM

    English Community Manager

  • WG Staff
  • 2640 battles
  • 356
  • [KOYO] KOYO
  • Member since:
    04-03-2013

View Postwill0hlep, on 19 August 2021 - 10:20 AM, said:

Well these tanks are pretty weak, I mean I suppose that atleast means they won't screw the meta of tier III and V
10:21 Added after 1 minute

Why is the feedback form just asking us where we saw the tanks first and not any actual questions about the tanks?

 

Once you select where you saw it, click next, that'll take you to the rest of the form :)



Miepie #6 Posted 19 August 2021 - 12:17 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8777 battles
  • 4,869
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018

View PostGeno1isme, on 19 August 2021 - 11:24 AM, said:

 

Who had the brilliant idea to add a second decimal digit to the armor values of the T3? 

Haha, "9.55 mm of armour"... I can see the guys on the factory floor already: "Gosh dangit, Hubert! We've been making 9.56 mm plates of armour all morning! We will be so screwed if the supervisor finds out!" :teethhappy:



Dexatroph #7 Posted 19 August 2021 - 12:40 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 53665 battles
  • 5,359
  • Member since:
    02-09-2013

View PostGeno1isme, on 19 August 2021 - 11:24 AM, said:

 

That KV-1 variant is literally worse in EVERY aspect than the regular KV-1 with the F-30. 0.51 dispersion and 2.9s aimtime for 110 damage? Heck even a fully stock KV-1 is better except for the penetration.

 

 

It will be a historical configuration for sure and follows the great T-34 L-11 from balancing perspective. We will see those gift tanks sooner or later in the game. And those, as you know, are not meant to have any useful balancing. ;)



saxsan4 #8 Posted 19 August 2021 - 12:45 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 32376 battles
  • 8,857
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostGeno1isme, on 19 August 2021 - 10:24 AM, said:

So you now constantly start with retarded balance numbers to make it appear as if feedback is actually incorporated when you tweak them closer to the actually intended values?

That KV-1 variant is literally worse in EVERY aspect than the regular KV-1 with the F-30. 0.51 dispersion and 2.9s aimtime for 110 damage? Heck even a fully stock KV-1 is better except for the penetration.

Who had the brilliant idea to add a second decimal digit to the armor values of the T3? And will be fun to fight Matildas, Somuas and Hetzers with that gun.

 

At least add some real questions to the feedback form to maintain that illusion.

because it gets more hp and better armour 



Geno1isme #9 Posted 19 August 2021 - 12:49 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 51617 battles
  • 13,781
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View PostDexatroph, on 19 August 2021 - 01:40 PM, said:

 

It will be a historical configuration for sure and follows the great T-34 L-11 from balancing perspective. We will see those gift tanks sooner or later in the game. And those, as you know, are not meant to have any useful balancing. ;)

Yeah, but the T-34 was at least moved down one tier. And gift tanks are usually limited to T2-4.

But as said, once a given number of feedback reports has been received they will probably tweak things a little to not be as completely absurd.

11:53 Added after 3 minute

View Postsaxsan4, on 19 August 2021 - 01:45 PM, said:

because it gets more hp and better armour 

More hp means little when the tank has no other qualities (the TOG at least has a decent gun), and even if it does actually get 10mm spaced armor or so (it's not really specified anywhere, the nominal armor values are the same as a stock KV-1) the armor won't perform much better. Certainly not enough to offset that cripple of a gun, reduced speed and viewrange.


Edited by Geno1isme, 19 August 2021 - 12:54 PM.


saxsan4 #10 Posted 19 August 2021 - 01:01 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 32376 battles
  • 8,857
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostGeno1isme, on 19 August 2021 - 11:49 AM, said:

Yeah, but the T-34 was at least moved down one tier. And gift tanks are usually limited to T2-4.

But as said, once a given number of feedback reports has been received they will probably tweak things a little to not be as completely absurd.

11:53 Added after 3 minute

More hp means little when the tank has no other qualities (the TOG at least has a decent gun), and even if it does actually get 10mm spaced armor or so (it's not really specified anywhere, the nominal armor values are the same as a stock KV-1) the armor won't perform much better. Certainly not enough to offset that cripple of a gun, reduced speed and viewrange.

it needs to be balanced and kv1 already overperforming so this is fine, if you don't like it, dont buy it



Geno1isme #11 Posted 19 August 2021 - 01:36 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 51617 battles
  • 13,781
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View Postsaxsan4, on 19 August 2021 - 02:01 PM, said:

it needs to be balanced and kv1 already overperforming so this is fine, if you don't like it, dont buy it

KV-1 is probably one of the most balanced tanks in the game. And don't worry, I'm not buying anything from WG anymore unless they fix the misclassification of the Borat. I'll leave that to you.



saxsan4 #12 Posted 19 August 2021 - 01:46 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 32376 battles
  • 8,857
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    11-08-2011

View PostGeno1isme, on 19 August 2021 - 12:36 PM, said:

KV-1 is probably one of the most balanced tanks in the game. And don't worry, I'm not buying anything from WG anymore unless they fix the misclassification of the Borat. I'll leave that to you.

i am wallet closed due to 2.0 (Uk tanks exception) 



KAJW_PL #13 Posted 19 August 2021 - 04:51 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18665 battles
  • 40
  • [MANTO] MANTO
  • Member since:
    05-15-2014

View PostGeno1isme, on 19 August 2021 - 01:36 PM, said:

KV-1 is probably one of the most balanced tanks in the game. And don't worry, I'm not buying anything from WG anymore unless they fix the misclassification of the Borat. I'll leave that to you.

 

amount of salt towards bourrasque haha

and its not even that OP



Geno1isme #14 Posted 19 August 2021 - 06:00 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 51617 battles
  • 13,781
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013

View PostKAJW_PL, on 19 August 2021 - 05:51 PM, said:

amount of salt towards bourrasque haha

and its not even that OP

That thing is a T10 light disguised as a T8 med so WG can sell it for cash. End of story.



Denton_0451 #15 Posted 19 August 2021 - 06:35 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29633 battles
  • 2,106
  • [NEGEV] NEGEV
  • Member since:
    02-18-2011

View PostDexatroph, on 19 August 2021 - 12:40 PM, said:

We will see those gift tanks sooner or later in the game.

 

I bet the KV-1 will be in the Xmas lootbox



Dexatroph #16 Posted 19 August 2021 - 07:23 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 53665 battles
  • 5,359
  • Member since:
    02-09-2013

View PostDenton_0451, on 19 August 2021 - 06:35 PM, said:

 

I bet the KV-1 will be in the Xmas lootbox

 

Could be the case, but would still  be just a filler for those boxes. Currently I don't see that this tank will be fun to play. Mainly because of the gun.The screens might add additional 5mm of armor (which does not apply for the front of the turret which will be worse (90mm) than the elite turret (100mm) of the KV-1), but this will not make it up for this bad gun. 


Edited by Dexatroph, 20 August 2021 - 11:49 AM.


frange #17 Posted 20 August 2021 - 12:15 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37465 battles
  • 1,117
  • [FRNR] FRNR
  • Member since:
    10-25-2013
That might be the effiest Google Translation I have read in several weeks - even the typical scam mail telling me I have 200000000 euros in the bank account that will be closed if I dont respond is usually written in more correct english than the OP post. Cant Failgaming at least hire someone with a high school degree in english?

Miepie #18 Posted 20 August 2021 - 08:43 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8777 battles
  • 4,869
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-19-2018

View Postfrange, on 20 August 2021 - 12:15 AM, said:

That might be the effiest Google Translation I have read in several weeks - even the typical scam mail telling me I have 200000000 euros in the bank account that will be closed if I dont respond is usually written in more correct english than the OP post. Cant Failgaming at least hire someone with a high school degree in english?

Why? Because they mistyped "projection" instead of protection and wrote "containers" instead of magazines? You may want to look at the spelling mistakes in your own post first.



GreenCamel #19 Posted 20 August 2021 - 09:03 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28074 battles
  • 295
  • [NR-NS] NR-NS
  • Member since:
    03-18-2014
T3 convertible would be tooo OP for its tier.
Nerf the gun.

frange #20 Posted 20 August 2021 - 01:05 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37465 battles
  • 1,117
  • [FRNR] FRNR
  • Member since:
    10-25-2013

View PostMiepie, on 20 August 2021 - 07:43 AM, said:

Why? Because they mistyped "projection" instead of protection and wrote "containers" instead of magazines? You may want to look at the spelling mistakes in your own post first.

Yeah - because Im just a forum user and not a official spokesperson of a international multi billion dollar company speaking out to its customers.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users